<mods xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3" version="3.3" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3 http://www.loc.gov/standards/mods/v3/mods-3-3.xsd" ID="P0b002ee1803784da">
<name type="corporate">
 <namePart>United States Government Publishing Office</namePart>
 <role>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">publisher</roleTerm>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="code">pbl</roleTerm>
</role>
 <role>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">distributor</roleTerm>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="code">dst</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="corporate">
 <namePart>United States</namePart>
 <namePart>Government Accountability Office</namePart>
 <namePart>National Security and International Affairs Division</namePart>
 <role>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">author</roleTerm>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="code">aut</roleTerm>
</role>
 <description>Government Organization</description>
</name>
<typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource>
<genre authority="marcgt">government publication</genre>
<language>
 <languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm>
</language>
<extension>
 <collectionCode>GAOREPORTS</collectionCode>
 <category>Legislative Agency Publications</category>
 <waisDatabaseName>gao</waisDatabaseName>
 <branch>legislative</branch>
 <dateIngested>2010-08-12</dateIngested>
</extension>
<originInfo>
 <publisher>U.S. Government Printing Office</publisher>
 <dateIssued encoding="w3cdtf">1994-04-26</dateIssued>
 <issuance>monographic</issuance>
</originInfo>
<physicalDescription>
 <note type="source content type">deposited</note>
 <digitalOrigin>born digital</digitalOrigin>
</physicalDescription>
<classification authority="sudocs">GA 1.13:T-NSIAD-94-159</classification>
<identifier type="uri">https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/GAOREPORTS-T-NSIAD-94-159</identifier>
<identifier type="local">P0b002ee1803784da</identifier>
<identifier type="former package identifier">f:tns94159</identifier>
<recordInfo>
 <recordContentSource authority="marcorg">DGPO</recordContentSource>
 <recordCreationDate encoding="w3cdtf">2010-08-12</recordCreationDate>
 <recordChangeDate encoding="w3cdtf">2011-03-24</recordChangeDate>
 <recordIdentifier source="DGPO">GAOREPORTS-T-NSIAD-94-159</recordIdentifier>
 <recordOrigin>machine generated</recordOrigin>
 <languageOfCataloging>
  <languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm>
</languageOfCataloging>
</recordInfo>
<accessCondition type="GPO scope determination">fdlp</accessCondition>
<extension>
 <docClass>REPORT</docClass>
 <accessId>GAOREPORTS-T-NSIAD-94-159</accessId>
 <reportNumber>T-NSIAD-94-159</reportNumber>
 <subject>Army facilities</subject>
 <subject>Chemical warfare</subject>
 <subject>Munitions</subject>
 <subject>Property disposal</subject>
 <subject>Waste disposal</subject>
 <subject>Hazardous substances</subject>
 <subject>Environmental impact statements</subject>
 <subject>Cost analysis</subject>
 <subject>Safety standards</subject>
 <subject>Research and development</subject>
 <identifier>Johnston Atoll</identifier>
 <identifier>Pueblo (CO)</identifier>
 <identifier>Army Chemical Munitions Stockpile Disposal Program</identifier>
 <identifier>Chemical Weapons Convention</identifier>
 <type>Testimony</type>
 <seriesAbbrev>NSIAD</seriesAbbrev>
</extension>
<titleInfo>
 <title>Chemical Weapons: Issues Involving Destruction Technologies</title>
</titleInfo>
<abstract>The most feasible technological alternatives to the incineration of
chemical weapons are in the initial stages of development and are more
than a decade away from becoming fully operational.  It is unlikely that
any of these technologies will be ready in time to destroy the entire
U.S. chemical weapons stockpile by the December 2204 deadline.  Any of
these alternative technologies could not, by itself, dispose of an
entire chemical weapon.  As a result, multiple technologies would have
to be developed and tested. Because the alternative technologies are in
the earliest stages of development, cost estimates are either
nonexistent or unreliable. Similarly, their performance cannot be
compared with that of incineration.  GAO did, however, identify
advantages and disadvantages to each technology.  This testimony also
discusses the operational safety of the Army&apos;s incineration facility on
Johnston Atoll and the cryofracture process, which involves soaking
munitions in liquid oxygen to make them brittle.  The munitions are then
crushed in a large hydraulic press before being incinerated.</abstract>
<location>
 <url displayLabel="HTML rendition" access="raw object">https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/GAOREPORTS-T-NSIAD-94-159/html/GAOREPORTS-T-NSIAD-94-159.htm</url>
</location>
<identifier type="preferred citation">GAO/T-NSIAD-94-159</identifier>
<location>
 <url displayLabel="Content Detail" access="object in context">https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/GAOREPORTS-T-NSIAD-94-159</url>
</location>
<note>Testimony</note>
<extension>
 <searchTitle>GAO/T-NSIAD-94-159; Chemical Weapons: Issues Involving Destruction Technologies;
            </searchTitle>
</extension>
<subject>
 <topic>Army facilities</topic>
 <topic>Chemical warfare</topic>
 <topic>Munitions</topic>
 <topic>Property disposal</topic>
 <topic>Waste disposal</topic>
 <topic>Hazardous substances</topic>
 <topic>Environmental impact statements</topic>
 <topic>Cost analysis</topic>
 <topic>Safety standards</topic>
 <topic>Research and development</topic>
 <topic>Johnston Atoll</topic>
 <topic>Pueblo (CO)</topic>
 <topic>Army Chemical Munitions Stockpile Disposal Program</topic>
 <topic>Chemical Weapons Convention</topic>
</subject>
</mods>