<mods xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3" version="3.3" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3 http://www.loc.gov/standards/mods/v3/mods-3-3.xsd" ID="P0b002ee18037e936">
<name type="corporate">
 <namePart>United States Government Publishing Office</namePart>
 <role>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">publisher</roleTerm>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="code">pbl</roleTerm>
</role>
 <role>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">distributor</roleTerm>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="code">dst</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="corporate">
 <namePart>United States</namePart>
 <namePart>Government Accountability Office</namePart>
 <namePart>Health, Education, and Human Services Division</namePart>
 <role>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">author</roleTerm>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="code">aut</roleTerm>
</role>
 <description>Government Organization</description>
</name>
<typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource>
<genre authority="marcgt">government publication</genre>
<language>
 <languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm>
</language>
<extension>
 <collectionCode>GAOREPORTS</collectionCode>
 <category>Legislative Agency Publications</category>
 <waisDatabaseName>gao</waisDatabaseName>
 <branch>legislative</branch>
 <dateIngested>2010-08-12</dateIngested>
</extension>
<originInfo>
 <publisher>U.S. Government Printing Office</publisher>
 <dateIssued encoding="w3cdtf">1998-01-29</dateIssued>
 <issuance>monographic</issuance>
</originInfo>
<physicalDescription>
 <note type="source content type">deposited</note>
 <digitalOrigin>born digital</digitalOrigin>
 <extent>17 p.</extent>
</physicalDescription>
<classification authority="sudocs">GA 1.13:T-HEHS-98-83</classification>
<identifier type="uri">https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/GAOREPORTS-T-HEHS-98-83</identifier>
<identifier type="local">P0b002ee18037e936</identifier>
<identifier type="former package identifier">f:he98083t</identifier>
<recordInfo>
 <recordContentSource authority="marcorg">DGPO</recordContentSource>
 <recordCreationDate encoding="w3cdtf">2010-08-12</recordCreationDate>
 <recordChangeDate encoding="w3cdtf">2011-03-24</recordChangeDate>
 <recordIdentifier source="DGPO">GAOREPORTS-T-HEHS-98-83</recordIdentifier>
 <recordOrigin>machine generated</recordOrigin>
 <languageOfCataloging>
  <languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm>
</languageOfCataloging>
</recordInfo>
<accessCondition type="GPO scope determination">fdlp</accessCondition>
<extension>
 <docClass>REPORT</docClass>
 <accessId>GAOREPORTS-T-HEHS-98-83</accessId>
 <reportNumber>T-HEHS-98-83</reportNumber>
 <subject>Public schools</subject>
 <subject>Computers</subject>
 <subject>School districts</subject>
 <subject>Educational grants</subject>
 <subject>Intergovernmental fiscal relations</subject>
 <subject>Information technology</subject>
 <subject>Federal/state relations</subject>
 <subject>State/local relations</subject>
 <subject>Aid for education</subject>
 <subject>Computer networks</subject>
 <identifier>Technology Innovation Challenge Grant Program</identifier>
 <identifier>Davidson County (NC)</identifier>
 <identifier>Gahanna (OH)</identifier>
 <identifier>Roswell (NM)</identifier>
 <identifier>Manchester (NH)</identifier>
 <identifier>Seattle (WA)</identifier>
 <type>Other Written Product</type>
 <seriesAbbrev>HEHS</seriesAbbrev>
</extension>
<titleInfo>
 <title>School Technology: Five School Districts&apos; Experiences in Financing Technology Programs</title>
</titleInfo>
<abstract>GAO discussed how school districts obtain funds for the acquisition of
education technology, focusing on: (1) sources of funding school
districts have used to develop and fund their technology programs; (2)
barriers districts have faced in funding the technology goals they set,
and how they attempted to deal with these barriers; (3) components of
districts&apos; technology programs that have been the most difficult to
fund, and what the consequences have been; and (4) districts&apos; plans to
deal with the ongoing costs of the technology they have acquired.&lt;p/&gt;GAO noted that: (1) the five districts it studied used a variety of ways
to fund their technology programs; (2) four types of barriers seemed to
be common to several districts: (a) technology was just one of a number
of competing needs and priorities, such as upkeep of school buildings;
(b) local community resistance to higher taxes limited districts&apos;
ability to raise more revenue; (c) officials said they did not have
enough staff for fund-raising efforts and therefore had difficulty
obtaining grants and funding from other sources such as business; and
(d) some funding sources had restrictive conditions or requirements that
made funding difficult to obtain; (3) to overcome these barriers,
officials reported that their districts used a variety of methods to
educate and inform the school board and the community about the value of
technology; (4) these ranged from presentations to parent groups to the
establishment of a model program at one school to showcase the value of
technology; (5) the parts of the technology program that were hardest to
fund, according to those GAO interviewed, were components such as
maintenance, training, and technical support, which depend heavily on
staff positions; (6) for example, in two locations special levy and bond
funding could be used only for capital expenditures--not for staff; (7)
in several districts GAO visited, officials said that staffing
shortfalls in maintenance and technical support had resulted in large
workloads for existing staff and in maintenance backlogs; (8) most said
this resulted in reduced computer use because computers were out of
service; and (9) as these districts looked to the future to support the
ongoing and periodic costs of their technology programs, they typically
planned to continue using a variety of funding sources despite
uncertainties associated with many of these sources.</abstract>
<location>
 <url displayLabel="HTML rendition" access="raw object">https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/GAOREPORTS-T-HEHS-98-83/html/GAOREPORTS-T-HEHS-98-83.htm</url>
 <url displayLabel="PDF rendition" access="raw object">https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/GAOREPORTS-T-HEHS-98-83/pdf/GAOREPORTS-T-HEHS-98-83.pdf</url>
</location>
<identifier type="preferred citation">GAO/T-HEHS-98-83</identifier>
<location>
 <url displayLabel="Content Detail" access="object in context">https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/GAOREPORTS-T-HEHS-98-83</url>
</location>
<note>Other Written Product</note>
<extension>
 <searchTitle>GAO/T-HEHS-98-83; School Technology: Five School Districts&apos; Experiences in Financing Technology Programs;
            </searchTitle>
</extension>
<subject>
 <topic>Public schools</topic>
 <topic>Computers</topic>
 <topic>School districts</topic>
 <topic>Educational grants</topic>
 <topic>Intergovernmental fiscal relations</topic>
 <topic>Information technology</topic>
 <topic>Federal/state relations</topic>
 <topic>State/local relations</topic>
 <topic>Aid for education</topic>
 <topic>Computer networks</topic>
 <topic>Technology Innovation Challenge Grant Program</topic>
 <topic>Davidson County (NC)</topic>
 <topic>Gahanna (OH)</topic>
 <topic>Roswell (NM)</topic>
 <topic>Manchester (NH)</topic>
 <topic>Seattle (WA)</topic>
</subject>
</mods>