<mods xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3" version="3.3" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3 http://www.loc.gov/standards/mods/v3/mods-3-3.xsd" ID="P0b002ee18038186b">
<name type="corporate">
 <namePart>United States Government Publishing Office</namePart>
 <role>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">publisher</roleTerm>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="code">pbl</roleTerm>
</role>
 <role>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">distributor</roleTerm>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="code">dst</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="corporate">
 <namePart>United States</namePart>
 <namePart>Government Accountability Office</namePart>
 <namePart>Health, Education, and Human Services Division</namePart>
 <role>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">author</roleTerm>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="code">aut</roleTerm>
</role>
 <description>Government Organization</description>
</name>
<typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource>
<genre authority="marcgt">government publication</genre>
<language>
 <languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm>
</language>
<extension>
 <collectionCode>GAOREPORTS</collectionCode>
 <category>Legislative Agency Publications</category>
 <waisDatabaseName>gao</waisDatabaseName>
 <branch>legislative</branch>
 <dateIngested>2010-08-12</dateIngested>
</extension>
<originInfo>
 <publisher>U.S. Government Printing Office</publisher>
 <dateIssued encoding="w3cdtf">1997-02-27</dateIssued>
 <issuance>monographic</issuance>
</originInfo>
<physicalDescription>
 <note type="source content type">deposited</note>
 <digitalOrigin>born digital</digitalOrigin>
 <extent>12 p.</extent>
</physicalDescription>
<classification authority="sudocs">GA 1.13:T-HEHS-97-84</classification>
<identifier type="uri">https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/GAOREPORTS-T-HEHS-97-84</identifier>
<identifier type="local">P0b002ee18038186b</identifier>
<identifier type="former package identifier">f:he97084t</identifier>
<recordInfo>
 <recordContentSource authority="marcorg">DGPO</recordContentSource>
 <recordCreationDate encoding="w3cdtf">2010-08-12</recordCreationDate>
 <recordChangeDate encoding="w3cdtf">2011-03-24</recordChangeDate>
 <recordIdentifier source="DGPO">GAOREPORTS-T-HEHS-97-84</recordIdentifier>
 <recordOrigin>machine generated</recordOrigin>
 <languageOfCataloging>
  <languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm>
</languageOfCataloging>
</recordInfo>
<accessCondition type="GPO scope determination">fdlp</accessCondition>
<extension>
 <docClass>REPORT</docClass>
 <accessId>GAOREPORTS-T-HEHS-97-84</accessId>
 <reportNumber>T-HEHS-97-84</reportNumber>
 <subject>Health care programs</subject>
 <subject>Retired military personnel</subject>
 <subject>Military dependents</subject>
 <subject>Health care costs</subject>
 <subject>Military downsizing</subject>
 <subject>Military hospitals</subject>
 <subject>Health care services</subject>
 <subject>Elderly persons</subject>
 <subject>Drugs</subject>
 <identifier>Civilian Health and Medical Program of the Uniformed</identifier>
 <identifier>Services</identifier>
 <identifier>CHAMPUS</identifier>
 <identifier>Medicare Program</identifier>
 <identifier>DOD TRICARE Prime Program</identifier>
 <identifier>DOD TRICARE Program</identifier>
 <identifier>Federal Employees Health Benefits Program</identifier>
 <identifier>Medigap</identifier>
 <type>Testimony</type>
 <seriesAbbrev>HEHS</seriesAbbrev>
</extension>
<titleInfo>
 <title>Defense Health Care: Limits to Older Retirees&apos; Access to Care and Proposals for Change</title>
</titleInfo>
<abstract>Pursuant to a congressional request, GAO discussed health care options
for retired military members and their families, focusing on: (1) older
retirees&apos; options for accessing health care and the related effects of
the Department of Defense&apos;s (DOD) recent health care system changes on
their access to care; and (2) proposed alternatives for addressing
retirees&apos; concerns and their potential effects on beneficiary and
government costs.&lt;p/&gt;GAO noted that: (1) its work has shown that recent system downsizing has
reduced all care, including space-available care, the only care retirees
may access at military facilities; (2) in the last 10 years, the number
of military medical personnel has declined by 15 percent and one-third
of military hospitals have been closed, reflecting the one-third
reduction in active-duty forces; (3) while further readiness-related
downsizing decisions are pending, some predict more system reductions;
(4) meanwhile, TRICARE, which does not allow older retirees to enroll in
its Prime health care option (its new health maintenance organization
option), is moving to maximize Prime enrollment at all the facilities;
(5) as this takes place, older retirees&apos; space-available care will
further decline at most facilities and eventually end at some; (6)
space-available care at military health facilities, moreover, is
episodic and lacks the continuity so important to older retirees who
have more frequent, and often chronic, medical problems than younger
retirees; (7) although retirees may also access care through such
government-sponsored programs as Medicare and private supplementary
health insurance, many retirees experience coverage gaps and high
out-of-pocket costs; (8) DOD and members of Congress have proposed
alternatives to address the availability, cost, and coverage issues
affecting retirees&apos; access to care: (9) these proposals have potentially
large price tags or fall short in helping those most affected by base
closures and TRICARE&apos;s implementation; (10) allowing retirees to join
the Federal Employees Health Benefits Program, or using the Civilian
Health and Medical Program of the Uniformed Services as a second payer
to Medicare, would provide retirees with more dependable, consistent
access to care; (11) costs, however, would be considerable, in part
because retirees whose care is now funded by other sources would most
likely join the new program; (12) to mitigate these costs, DOD would
probably need to explore measures such as alternative beneficiary cost
sharing; (13) in addition, although not yet fully developed, DOD&apos;s
pharmacy proposal would provide retirees a single benefit not covered by
basic Medicare and could fill the gap in coverage until system
restructuring decisions are made and the related consequences known; and
(14) DOD has not yet decided, however, on benefit eligibility, delivery*</abstract>
<location>
 <url displayLabel="HTML rendition" access="raw object">https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/GAOREPORTS-T-HEHS-97-84/html/GAOREPORTS-T-HEHS-97-84.htm</url>
 <url displayLabel="PDF rendition" access="raw object">https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/GAOREPORTS-T-HEHS-97-84/pdf/GAOREPORTS-T-HEHS-97-84.pdf</url>
</location>
<identifier type="preferred citation">GAO/T-HEHS-97-84</identifier>
<location>
 <url displayLabel="Content Detail" access="object in context">https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/GAOREPORTS-T-HEHS-97-84</url>
</location>
<note>Testimony</note>
<extension>
 <searchTitle>GAO/T-HEHS-97-84; Defense Health Care: Limits to Older Retirees&apos; Access to Care and Proposals for Change;
            </searchTitle>
</extension>
<subject>
 <topic>Health care programs</topic>
 <topic>Retired military personnel</topic>
 <topic>Military dependents</topic>
 <topic>Health care costs</topic>
 <topic>Military downsizing</topic>
 <topic>Military hospitals</topic>
 <topic>Health care services</topic>
 <topic>Elderly persons</topic>
 <topic>Drugs</topic>
 <topic>Civilian Health and Medical Program of the Uniformed</topic>
 <topic>Services</topic>
 <topic>CHAMPUS</topic>
 <topic>Medicare Program</topic>
 <topic>DOD TRICARE Prime Program</topic>
 <topic>DOD TRICARE Program</topic>
 <topic>Federal Employees Health Benefits Program</topic>
 <topic>Medigap</topic>
</subject>
</mods>