<mods xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3" version="3.3" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3 http://www.loc.gov/standards/mods/v3/mods-3-3.xsd" ID="P0b002ee180380f35">
<name type="corporate">
 <namePart>United States Government Publishing Office</namePart>
 <role>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">publisher</roleTerm>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="code">pbl</roleTerm>
</role>
 <role>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">distributor</roleTerm>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="code">dst</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="corporate">
 <namePart>United States</namePart>
 <namePart>Government Accountability Office</namePart>
 <namePart>General Government Division</namePart>
 <role>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">author</roleTerm>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="code">aut</roleTerm>
</role>
 <description>Government Organization</description>
</name>
<typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource>
<genre authority="marcgt">government publication</genre>
<language>
 <languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm>
</language>
<extension>
 <collectionCode>GAOREPORTS</collectionCode>
 <category>Legislative Agency Publications</category>
 <waisDatabaseName>gao</waisDatabaseName>
 <branch>legislative</branch>
 <dateIngested>2010-08-12</dateIngested>
</extension>
<originInfo>
 <publisher>U.S. Government Printing Office</publisher>
 <dateIssued encoding="w3cdtf">1999-02-04</dateIssued>
 <issuance>monographic</issuance>
</originInfo>
<physicalDescription>
 <note type="source content type">deposited</note>
 <digitalOrigin>born digital</digitalOrigin>
 <extent>22 p.</extent>
</physicalDescription>
<classification authority="sudocs">GA 1.13:T-GGD/AIMD-99-65</classification>
<identifier type="uri">https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/GAOREPORTS-T-GGD-AIMD-99-65</identifier>
<identifier type="local">P0b002ee180380f35</identifier>
<identifier type="former package identifier">f:g199065t</identifier>
<recordInfo>
 <recordContentSource authority="marcorg">DGPO</recordContentSource>
 <recordCreationDate encoding="w3cdtf">2010-08-12</recordCreationDate>
 <recordChangeDate encoding="w3cdtf">2011-03-23</recordChangeDate>
 <recordIdentifier source="DGPO">GAOREPORTS-T-GGD-AIMD-99-65</recordIdentifier>
 <recordOrigin>machine generated</recordOrigin>
 <languageOfCataloging>
  <languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm>
</languageOfCataloging>
</recordInfo>
<accessCondition type="GPO scope determination">fdlp</accessCondition>
<extension>
 <docClass>REPORT</docClass>
 <accessId>GAOREPORTS-T-GGD-AIMD-99-65</accessId>
 <reportNumber>T-GGD/AIMD-99-65</reportNumber>
 <subject>Presidential budgets</subject>
 <subject>Agency missions</subject>
 <subject>Computer security</subject>
 <subject>Financial management systems</subject>
 <subject>Federal procurement</subject>
 <subject>Information resources management</subject>
 <subject>Federal agency reorganization</subject>
 <subject>Financial statement audits</subject>
 <subject>Congressional/executive relations</subject>
 <identifier>OMB 2000 Initiative</identifier>
 <identifier>Joint Financial Management Improvement Program</identifier>
 <identifier>Y2K</identifier>
 <type>Testimony</type>
 <seriesAbbrev>GGD</seriesAbbrev>
 <seriesAbbrev>AIMD</seriesAbbrev>
</extension>
<titleInfo>
 <title>Government Management: Observations on OMB&apos;s Management</title>
</titleInfo>
<abstract>Pursuant to a congressional request, GAO discussed its observations on
the Office of Management and Budget&apos;s (OMB) efforts to carry out its
responsibilities to set policy and oversee the management of the
executive branch, focusing on: (1) OMB&apos;s wide-ranging management
responsibilities and the question of whether to integrate or separate
management and budget functions; (2) the effectiveness of OMB&apos;s
management leadership; and (3) the factors that appear to contribute to
progress in sustaining improvements in federal management.&lt;p/&gt;GAO noted that: (1) OMB is the lead agency for overseeing a statutory
framework of financial, information resources, and performance planning
and measurement reforms designed to instill a performance-based approach
to federal management, decisionmaking, and accountability; (2) the Chief
Financial Officers Act of 1990 mandated significant financial management
reforms and established the Deputy Director for Management (DDM)
position within OMB; (3) the DDM is to serve as the government&apos;s key
official for financial management and coordinate and supervise a wide
range of general management functions; (4) OMB is responsible for
providing guidance and oversight for various other laws and executive
orders as well; (5) OMB&apos;s perennial challenge is to carry out its
central management leadership responsibilities in such a way that
leverages opportunities of the budget process, while at the same time
ensuring that management concerns receive appropriate attention in an
environment driven by budget and policy decisions; (6) prior OMB
reorganizations have alternated between seeking to more directly
integrate management into the budget review process and creating
separate management offices; (7) previous congressional and OMB attempts
to elevate the status of management by creating separate management
units within OMB sought to ensure that an adequate level of effort was
focused on management issues; (8) OMB has focused increased attention on
management issues, but there is much more that needs to be done; (9) OMB
should ensure that agencies incorporate appropriate goals and strategies
in their annual performance plans and describe their relevance to
achieving the priority management objectives described in the
governmentwide performance plan; (10) the record of OMB&apos;s stewardship of
management initiatives suggests that creating and sustaining attention
to management improvement is a key to addressing the federal
government&apos;s longstanding problems; (11) in the past, management issues
often remained subordinated to budget concerns and timeframes, and the
leverage the budget could offer to advance management efforts was not
directly used to address management issues; and (12) continued
improvement in OMB&apos;s strategic plans would provide congressional
decisionmakers with better information to use in determining the extent
to which OMB is addressing its statutory management and budgetary
responsibilities, as well as in assessing OMB&apos;s contributions toward
achieving desired results.</abstract>
<location>
 <url displayLabel="HTML rendition" access="raw object">https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/GAOREPORTS-T-GGD-AIMD-99-65/html/GAOREPORTS-T-GGD-AIMD-99-65.htm</url>
 <url displayLabel="PDF rendition" access="raw object">https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/GAOREPORTS-T-GGD-AIMD-99-65/pdf/GAOREPORTS-T-GGD-AIMD-99-65.pdf</url>
</location>
<identifier type="preferred citation">GAO/T-GGD/AIMD-99-65</identifier>
<location>
 <url displayLabel="Content Detail" access="object in context">https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/GAOREPORTS-T-GGD-AIMD-99-65</url>
</location>
<note>Testimony</note>
<extension>
 <searchTitle>GAO/T-GGD/AIMD-99-65; Government Management: Observations on OMB&apos;s Management;
            </searchTitle>
</extension>
<subject>
 <topic>Presidential budgets</topic>
 <topic>Agency missions</topic>
 <topic>Computer security</topic>
 <topic>Financial management systems</topic>
 <topic>Federal procurement</topic>
 <topic>Information resources management</topic>
 <topic>Federal agency reorganization</topic>
 <topic>Financial statement audits</topic>
 <topic>Congressional/executive relations</topic>
 <topic>OMB 2000 Initiative</topic>
 <topic>Joint Financial Management Improvement Program</topic>
 <topic>Y2K</topic>
</subject>
</mods>