<mods xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3" version="3.3" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3 http://www.loc.gov/standards/mods/v3/mods-3-3.xsd" ID="P0b002ee18039c90a">
<name type="corporate">
 <namePart>United States Government Publishing Office</namePart>
 <role>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">publisher</roleTerm>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="code">pbl</roleTerm>
</role>
 <role>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">distributor</roleTerm>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="code">dst</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="corporate">
 <namePart>United States</namePart>
 <namePart>Government Accountability Office</namePart>
 <namePart>General Government Division</namePart>
 <role>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">author</roleTerm>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="code">aut</roleTerm>
</role>
 <description>Government Organization</description>
</name>
<typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource>
<genre authority="marcgt">government publication</genre>
<language>
 <languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm>
</language>
<extension>
 <collectionCode>GAOREPORTS</collectionCode>
 <category>Legislative Agency Publications</category>
 <waisDatabaseName>gao</waisDatabaseName>
 <branch>legislative</branch>
 <dateIngested>2010-08-12</dateIngested>
</extension>
<originInfo>
 <publisher>U.S. Government Printing Office</publisher>
 <dateIssued encoding="w3cdtf">1999-04-21</dateIssued>
 <issuance>monographic</issuance>
</originInfo>
<physicalDescription>
 <note type="source content type">deposited</note>
 <digitalOrigin>born digital</digitalOrigin>
 <extent>20 p.</extent>
</physicalDescription>
<classification authority="sudocs">GA 1.13:T-GGD-99-86</classification>
<identifier type="uri">https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/GAOREPORTS-T-GGD-99-86</identifier>
<identifier type="local">P0b002ee18039c90a</identifier>
<identifier type="former package identifier">f:gg99086t</identifier>
<recordInfo>
 <recordContentSource authority="marcorg">DGPO</recordContentSource>
 <recordCreationDate encoding="w3cdtf">2010-08-12</recordCreationDate>
 <recordChangeDate encoding="w3cdtf">2011-03-28</recordChangeDate>
 <recordIdentifier source="DGPO">GAOREPORTS-T-GGD-99-86</recordIdentifier>
 <recordOrigin>machine generated</recordOrigin>
 <languageOfCataloging>
  <languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm>
</languageOfCataloging>
</recordInfo>
<accessCondition type="GPO scope determination">fdlp</accessCondition>
<extension>
 <docClass>REPORT</docClass>
 <accessId>GAOREPORTS-T-GGD-99-86</accessId>
 <reportNumber>T-GGD-99-86</reportNumber>
 <subject>Drug trafficking</subject>
 <subject>Smuggling</subject>
 <subject>Internal controls</subject>
 <subject>Bribery</subject>
 <subject>Ethical conduct</subject>
 <subject>Federal employees</subject>
 <subject>Personnel management</subject>
 <subject>Customs administration</subject>
 <subject>Crimes or offenses</subject>
 <identifier>Texas</identifier>
 <identifier>California</identifier>
 <type>Testimony</type>
 <seriesAbbrev>GGD</seriesAbbrev>
</extension>
<titleInfo>
 <title>Drug Control: INS and Customs Can Do More To Prevent</title>
</titleInfo>
<abstract>The corruption of Immigration and Naturalization Service (INS) and U.S.
Customs Service employees along the Southwest border by drug traffickers
is a serious and continuing threat. Some of these employees have waved
drug loads through ports of entry, coordinated the movement of drugs
across the border, transported drugs past Border Patrol checkpoints,
sold drugs, and revealed drug intelligence information. Both INS and
Customs have policies and procedures to help ensure the integrity of
their employees. However, neither agency is taking full advantage of its
policies, procedures, and the lessons to be learned from closed
corruption cases to address the rising threat of employee corruption on
the Southwest border. For example, although the agencies generally
completed background investigations for new hires by the end of their
first year on the job, reinvestigations were typically overdue, in some
cases by as much as three years. The Justice Department&apos;s Office of the
Inspector General and Customs&apos; Office of Internal Affairs, which deal
with allegations of drug-related misconduct by INS and Customs
employees, are required to formally report internal control weaknesses
identified from closed corruption cases. However, GAO&apos;s review of 28
cases involving INS and Customs employees along the Southwest border who
had been convicted of drug-related crimes between 1992 and 1997 found
internal control weaknesses that were not formally reported or
corrected. These weaknesses included instances where (1) drug smugglers
chose the inspection lane at a port of entry, (2) INS and Customs
employees did not recuse themselves from inspecting persons with whom
they had close personal relationships, and (3) law enforcement personnel
were allowed to cross the Southwest border or pass Border Control
checkpoints without inspection. Also, INS and Customs have not formally
evaluated their integrity procedures to determine their effectiveness.
For example, GAO found that financial information required for
background investigations and reinvestigations was either limited or not
fully reviewed. This testimony summarizes the April 1999 report,
GAO/GGD-99-31.</abstract>
<location>
 <url displayLabel="HTML rendition" access="raw object">https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/GAOREPORTS-T-GGD-99-86/html/GAOREPORTS-T-GGD-99-86.htm</url>
 <url displayLabel="PDF rendition" access="raw object">https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/GAOREPORTS-T-GGD-99-86/pdf/GAOREPORTS-T-GGD-99-86.pdf</url>
</location>
<identifier type="preferred citation">GAO/T-GGD-99-86</identifier>
<location>
 <url displayLabel="Content Detail" access="object in context">https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/GAOREPORTS-T-GGD-99-86</url>
</location>
<note>Testimony</note>
<extension>
 <searchTitle>GAO/T-GGD-99-86; Drug Control: INS and Customs Can Do More To Prevent;
            </searchTitle>
</extension>
<subject>
 <topic>Drug trafficking</topic>
 <topic>Smuggling</topic>
 <topic>Internal controls</topic>
 <topic>Bribery</topic>
 <topic>Ethical conduct</topic>
 <topic>Federal employees</topic>
 <topic>Personnel management</topic>
 <topic>Customs administration</topic>
 <topic>Crimes or offenses</topic>
 <topic>Texas</topic>
 <topic>California</topic>
</subject>
</mods>