<mods xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3" version="3.3" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3 http://www.loc.gov/standards/mods/v3/mods-3-3.xsd" ID="P0b002ee180395cbb">
<name type="corporate">
 <namePart>United States Government Publishing Office</namePart>
 <role>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">publisher</roleTerm>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="code">pbl</roleTerm>
</role>
 <role>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">distributor</roleTerm>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="code">dst</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="corporate">
 <namePart>United States</namePart>
 <namePart>Government Accountability Office</namePart>
 <namePart>General Government Division</namePart>
 <role>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">author</roleTerm>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="code">aut</roleTerm>
</role>
 <description>Government Organization</description>
</name>
<typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource>
<genre authority="marcgt">government publication</genre>
<language>
 <languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm>
</language>
<extension>
 <collectionCode>GAOREPORTS</collectionCode>
 <category>Legislative Agency Publications</category>
 <waisDatabaseName>gao</waisDatabaseName>
 <branch>legislative</branch>
 <dateIngested>2010-08-12</dateIngested>
</extension>
<originInfo>
 <publisher>U.S. Government Printing Office</publisher>
 <dateIssued encoding="w3cdtf">1999-05-25</dateIssued>
 <issuance>monographic</issuance>
</originInfo>
<physicalDescription>
 <note type="source content type">deposited</note>
 <digitalOrigin>born digital</digitalOrigin>
 <extent>8 p.</extent>
</physicalDescription>
<classification authority="sudocs">GA 1.13:T-GGD-99-106</classification>
<identifier type="uri">https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/GAOREPORTS-T-GGD-99-106</identifier>
<identifier type="local">P0b002ee180395cbb</identifier>
<identifier type="former package identifier">f:gg99106t</identifier>
<recordInfo>
 <recordContentSource authority="marcorg">DGPO</recordContentSource>
 <recordCreationDate encoding="w3cdtf">2010-08-12</recordCreationDate>
 <recordChangeDate encoding="w3cdtf">2011-03-28</recordChangeDate>
 <recordIdentifier source="DGPO">GAOREPORTS-T-GGD-99-106</recordIdentifier>
 <recordOrigin>machine generated</recordOrigin>
 <languageOfCataloging>
  <languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm>
</languageOfCataloging>
</recordInfo>
<accessCondition type="GPO scope determination">fdlp</accessCondition>
<extension>
 <docClass>REPORT</docClass>
 <accessId>GAOREPORTS-T-GGD-99-106</accessId>
 <reportNumber>T-GGD-99-106</reportNumber>
 <subject>Drug trafficking</subject>
 <subject>Bribery</subject>
 <subject>Ethical conduct</subject>
 <subject>Customs administration</subject>
 <subject>Personnel management</subject>
 <subject>Federal employees</subject>
 <subject>Internal controls</subject>
 <subject>Smuggling</subject>
 <type>Other Written Product</type>
 <seriesAbbrev>GGD</seriesAbbrev>
</extension>
<titleInfo>
 <title>Drug Control: Customs Can Do More To Prevent Drug-Related</title>
</titleInfo>
<abstract>Pursuant to a congressional request, GAO discussed the Customs Service&apos;s
efforts to combat drug-related corruption, focusing on: (1) the extent
to which Customs has complied with policies and procedures for ensuring
employee integrity; (2) an identification of the types of illegal
drug-related activities of which Customs employees on the Southwest
Border have been convicted; (3) an identification of the Department of
the Treasury&apos;s organizational structures, policies, and procedures for
handling allegations of drug-related employee misconduct and whether the
policies and procedures were followed; and (4) the extent to which
lessons learned from corruption cases closed in fiscal years 1992
through 1997 have led to changes in policies and procedures for
preventing the drug-related corruption of Customs employees.&lt;p/&gt;GAO noted that: (1) Customs has policies and procedures designed to help
ensure the integrity of its employees; (2) however, Customs&apos; compliance
with these policies and procedures has varied; (3) the policies and
procedures consist mainly of mandatory background investigations for new
staff and 5-year reinvestigations of employees, as well as basic
integrity training; (4) while Customs generally completed required
background investigations for new hires by the end of their first year
on the job, reinvestigations were typically overdue, in some instances
by as many as 3 years; (5) Customs provided integrity training to new
employees during basic training, but advanced integrity training was not
required; (6) Customs had not formally evaluated its integrity
procedures to determine their effectiveness; (7) one way to evaluate the
effectiveness of integrity procedures would be to use drug-related
investigative case information; (8) Treasury has established procedures
for handling allegations of employee misconduct; (9) within Treasury,
Customs&apos; Office of Internal Affairs is generally responsible for
investigating both criminal and noncriminal allegations against Customs
employees; (10) GAO could not readily determine if the Office of
Internal Affairs complied with the investigative procedures because
Customs&apos; automated case management system and its investigative case
files did not provide the necessary information to assess compliance
with these procedures; (11) Customs has missed opportunities to: (a)
learn lessons from drug-related corruption cases; and (b) change its
policies and procedures for preventing drug-related employee corruption;
(12) GAO&apos;s review of the closed cases of nine convicted employees
revealed internal control weaknesses that were not formally reported by
the Office of Internal Affairs, even though Customs procedures require
them to formally report internal control weaknesses identified during
investigations; and (13) these weaknesses included instances where: (a)
drug smugglers chose the inspection lane at a port of entry; (b) Customs
employees did not recuse themselves from inspecting individuals with
whom they had close personal relationships; and (c) law enforcement
personnel were allowed to cross the Southwest Border without inspection.</abstract>
<location>
 <url displayLabel="HTML rendition" access="raw object">https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/GAOREPORTS-T-GGD-99-106/html/GAOREPORTS-T-GGD-99-106.htm</url>
 <url displayLabel="PDF rendition" access="raw object">https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/GAOREPORTS-T-GGD-99-106/pdf/GAOREPORTS-T-GGD-99-106.pdf</url>
</location>
<identifier type="preferred citation">GAO/T-GGD-99-106</identifier>
<location>
 <url displayLabel="Content Detail" access="object in context">https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/GAOREPORTS-T-GGD-99-106</url>
</location>
<note>Other Written Product</note>
<extension>
 <searchTitle>GAO/T-GGD-99-106; Drug Control: Customs Can Do More To Prevent Drug-Related;
            </searchTitle>
</extension>
<subject>
 <topic>Drug trafficking</topic>
 <topic>Bribery</topic>
 <topic>Ethical conduct</topic>
 <topic>Customs administration</topic>
 <topic>Personnel management</topic>
 <topic>Federal employees</topic>
 <topic>Internal controls</topic>
 <topic>Smuggling</topic>
</subject>
</mods>