<mods xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3" version="3.3" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3 http://www.loc.gov/standards/mods/v3/mods-3-3.xsd" ID="P0b002ee18039ac61">
<name type="corporate">
 <namePart>United States Government Publishing Office</namePart>
 <role>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">publisher</roleTerm>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="code">pbl</roleTerm>
</role>
 <role>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">distributor</roleTerm>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="code">dst</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="corporate">
 <namePart>United States</namePart>
 <namePart>Government Accountability Office</namePart>
 <namePart>General Government Division</namePart>
 <role>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">author</roleTerm>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="code">aut</roleTerm>
</role>
 <description>Government Organization</description>
</name>
<typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource>
<genre authority="marcgt">government publication</genre>
<language>
 <languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm>
</language>
<extension>
 <collectionCode>GAOREPORTS</collectionCode>
 <category>Legislative Agency Publications</category>
 <waisDatabaseName>gao</waisDatabaseName>
 <branch>legislative</branch>
 <dateIngested>2010-08-12</dateIngested>
</extension>
<originInfo>
 <publisher>U.S. Government Printing Office</publisher>
 <dateIssued encoding="w3cdtf">1998-02-24</dateIssued>
 <issuance>monographic</issuance>
</originInfo>
<physicalDescription>
 <note type="source content type">deposited</note>
 <digitalOrigin>born digital</digitalOrigin>
 <extent>17 p.</extent>
</physicalDescription>
<classification authority="sudocs">GA 1.13:T-GGD-98-72</classification>
<identifier type="uri">https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/GAOREPORTS-T-GGD-98-72</identifier>
<identifier type="local">P0b002ee18039ac61</identifier>
<identifier type="former package identifier">f:gg98072t</identifier>
<recordInfo>
 <recordContentSource authority="marcorg">DGPO</recordContentSource>
 <recordCreationDate encoding="w3cdtf">2010-08-12</recordCreationDate>
 <recordChangeDate encoding="w3cdtf">2011-03-28</recordChangeDate>
 <recordIdentifier source="DGPO">GAOREPORTS-T-GGD-98-72</recordIdentifier>
 <recordOrigin>machine generated</recordOrigin>
 <languageOfCataloging>
  <languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm>
</languageOfCataloging>
</recordInfo>
<accessCondition type="GPO scope determination">fdlp</accessCondition>
<extension>
 <docClass>REPORT</docClass>
 <accessId>GAOREPORTS-T-GGD-98-72</accessId>
 <reportNumber>T-GGD-98-72</reportNumber>
 <subject>Taxpayers</subject>
 <subject>Tax returns</subject>
 <subject>Personal liability (legal)</subject>
 <subject>Divorced persons</subject>
 <subject>Eligibility criteria</subject>
 <subject>Tax nonpayment</subject>
 <subject>State law</subject>
 <subject>Government publications</subject>
 <subject>Tax administration</subject>
 <identifier>IRS Offer in Compromise Program</identifier>
 <identifier>IRS Problem Resolution Program</identifier>
 <type>Testimony</type>
 <seriesAbbrev>GGD</seriesAbbrev>
</extension>
<titleInfo>
 <title>Innocent Spouse: Alternatives For Improving Innocent Spouse Relief</title>
</titleInfo>
<abstract>GAO discussed its report on the innocent spouse provisions of the
Internal Revenue Code, focusing on: (1) the universe of taxpayers
potentially eligible for innocent spouse relief; (2) the Internal
Revenue Service&apos;s (IRS) practices and procedures for handling requests
for such relief; (3) whether the existing innocent spouse provisions
provide the same opportunity for relief for all taxpayers; (4) the
potential effects of replacing the joint and several liability standard
with a proportionate liability standard; (5) the potential effects on
IRS of requiring it to abide by the terms of divorce decrees that
allocate tax liabilities; and (6) the potential effects of limiting IRS&apos;
ability to seize community income to satisfy the tax liabilities
incurred by one of the spouses before the marriage.&lt;p/&gt;GAO noted that: (1) under current law, only about 1 percent of couples
who filed joint returns in 1992 had additional tax assessments that
potentially met the dollar threshold for innocent spouse relief; (2) if
only divorced taxpayers were counted, about 35,000 of the 587,000
couples with additional tax assessments of more than $500 for 1992 may
have been eligible for innocent spouse relief; fewer would probably
actually qualify; (3) the limited information available indicated that
IRS received few requests for innocent spouse relief and denied most of
them; (4) the current provisions may not ensure that all deserving
taxpayers receive equivalent relief; (5) one way to address concerns
with the innocent spouse provisions would be to replace the joint and
several liability standard with a proportionate liability standard; (6)
under this standard, each spouse becomes individually responsible for
the entire amount of the tax associated with a joint return; (7) under a
proportionate liability standard, couples would be responsible only for
the taxes generated by their individual incomes and assets; (8)
requiring IRS to be bound by divorce decrees is impractical for two
major reasons; (9) first, federal tax matters are the exclusive
jurisdiction of certain federal courts, while divorce matters are
generally handled by state courts; (10) thus, there is currently no
legal forum where IRS and the parties to a divorce could resolve issues
relating to both tax and divorce matters; (11) second, this proposal
could require IRS to become involved in every divorce settlement to
ensure that the government&apos;s interest is protected; (12) in community
property states, IRS can levy one spouse&apos;s income to satisfy the
premarital tax debts of the other spouse because of the joint ownership
of property in those states; (13) in contrast, IRS cannot levy the
income of one spouse to pay the premarital tax debt of the other spouse
in common law states because spouses do not have legal entitlement to
each other&apos;s property; (14) since IRS does not maintain data on how
often it levies community property to settle premarital tax debts, GAO
could not assess the potential impact on IRS of changing the law to
treat everyone the way it treats taxpayers in common law states; and
(15) the Department of Treasury&apos;s report parallels GAO&apos;s report on
identifying ways to improve the administration of the current innocent
spouse provisions.</abstract>
<location>
 <url displayLabel="HTML rendition" access="raw object">https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/GAOREPORTS-T-GGD-98-72/html/GAOREPORTS-T-GGD-98-72.htm</url>
 <url displayLabel="PDF rendition" access="raw object">https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/GAOREPORTS-T-GGD-98-72/pdf/GAOREPORTS-T-GGD-98-72.pdf</url>
</location>
<identifier type="preferred citation">GAO/T-GGD-98-72</identifier>
<location>
 <url displayLabel="Content Detail" access="object in context">https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/GAOREPORTS-T-GGD-98-72</url>
</location>
<note>Testimony</note>
<extension>
 <searchTitle>GAO/T-GGD-98-72; Innocent Spouse: Alternatives For Improving Innocent Spouse Relief;
            </searchTitle>
</extension>
<subject>
 <topic>Taxpayers</topic>
 <topic>Tax returns</topic>
 <topic>Personal liability (legal)</topic>
 <topic>Divorced persons</topic>
 <topic>Eligibility criteria</topic>
 <topic>Tax nonpayment</topic>
 <topic>State law</topic>
 <topic>Government publications</topic>
 <topic>Tax administration</topic>
 <topic>IRS Offer in Compromise Program</topic>
 <topic>IRS Problem Resolution Program</topic>
</subject>
</mods>