<mods xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3" version="3.3" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3 http://www.loc.gov/standards/mods/v3/mods-3-3.xsd" ID="P0b002ee180388403">
<name type="corporate">
 <namePart>United States Government Publishing Office</namePart>
 <role>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">publisher</roleTerm>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="code">pbl</roleTerm>
</role>
 <role>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">distributor</roleTerm>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="code">dst</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="corporate">
 <namePart>United States</namePart>
 <namePart>Government Accountability Office</namePart>
 <namePart>General Government Division</namePart>
 <role>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">author</roleTerm>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="code">aut</roleTerm>
</role>
 <description>Government Organization</description>
</name>
<typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource>
<genre authority="marcgt">government publication</genre>
<language>
 <languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm>
</language>
<extension>
 <collectionCode>GAOREPORTS</collectionCode>
 <category>Legislative Agency Publications</category>
 <waisDatabaseName>gao</waisDatabaseName>
 <branch>legislative</branch>
 <dateIngested>2010-08-12</dateIngested>
</extension>
<originInfo>
 <publisher>U.S. Government Printing Office</publisher>
 <dateIssued encoding="w3cdtf">1998-07-14</dateIssued>
 <issuance>monographic</issuance>
</originInfo>
<physicalDescription>
 <note type="source content type">deposited</note>
 <digitalOrigin>born digital</digitalOrigin>
 <extent>15 p.</extent>
</physicalDescription>
<classification authority="sudocs">GA 1.13:T-GGD-98-163</classification>
<identifier type="uri">https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/GAOREPORTS-T-GGD-98-163</identifier>
<identifier type="local">P0b002ee180388403</identifier>
<identifier type="former package identifier">f:gg98163t</identifier>
<recordInfo>
 <recordContentSource authority="marcorg">DGPO</recordContentSource>
 <recordCreationDate encoding="w3cdtf">2010-08-12</recordCreationDate>
 <recordChangeDate encoding="w3cdtf">2011-03-28</recordChangeDate>
 <recordIdentifier source="DGPO">GAOREPORTS-T-GGD-98-163</recordIdentifier>
 <recordOrigin>machine generated</recordOrigin>
 <languageOfCataloging>
  <languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm>
</languageOfCataloging>
</recordInfo>
<accessCondition type="GPO scope determination">fdlp</accessCondition>
<extension>
 <docClass>REPORT</docClass>
 <accessId>GAOREPORTS-T-GGD-98-163</accessId>
 <reportNumber>T-GGD-98-163</reportNumber>
 <subject>Congressional/executive relations</subject>
 <subject>Executive orders</subject>
 <subject>Federal advisory bodies</subject>
 <subject>Surveys</subject>
 <subject>Congressional oversight</subject>
 <subject>Accountability</subject>
 <type>Testimony</type>
 <seriesAbbrev>GGD</seriesAbbrev>
</extension>
<titleInfo>
 <title>Federal Advisory Committee Act: Advisory Committee Process Appears to Be Working, but Some Concerns Exist</title>
</titleInfo>
<abstract>GAO discussed the: (1) views of federal advisory committee members and
federal agencies on specific Federal Advisory Committee Act (FACA)
matters; and (2) General Services Administration&apos;s (GSA) efforts in
carrying out its oversight responsibilities under FACA.&lt;p/&gt;GAO noted that: (1) advisory committees appear to be adhering to the
requirements of FACA and Executive Order 12838, which led to the
establishment of ceilings for each agency on the number of discretionary
advisory committees; (2) these requirements do not appear to be overly
burdensome to agencies; (3) although the responses of committee members
and agencies portrayed a more positive than negative image of FACA,
their responses did raise concerns and issues that the House Committee
on Government Reform and Oversight, Subcommittee on Government
Management, Information, and Technology may wish to explore in its
consideration of FACA; (4) there appears to be some concern among
agencies about the possibility of being sued for noncompliance with FACA
if they obtain input from parties who are outside of the agency and its
advisory committees; (5) GSA&apos;s Committee Management Secretariat has
fallen short of fulfilling its FACA oversight responsibilities; (6)
further, GSA did not ensure that the advisory committees were
established with complete charters and justification letters; (7) 36
percent of the 203 advisory committee charters and 38 percent of the 107
justification letters from October 1996 through July 1997 that GAO
reviewed were missing one or more items required by FACA or GSA
regulations; and (8) GSA said that it will take immediate action to
improve its oversight.</abstract>
<location>
 <url displayLabel="HTML rendition" access="raw object">https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/GAOREPORTS-T-GGD-98-163/html/GAOREPORTS-T-GGD-98-163.htm</url>
 <url displayLabel="PDF rendition" access="raw object">https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/GAOREPORTS-T-GGD-98-163/pdf/GAOREPORTS-T-GGD-98-163.pdf</url>
</location>
<identifier type="preferred citation">GAO/T-GGD-98-163</identifier>
<location>
 <url displayLabel="Content Detail" access="object in context">https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/GAOREPORTS-T-GGD-98-163</url>
</location>
<note>Testimony</note>
<extension>
 <searchTitle>GAO/T-GGD-98-163; Federal Advisory Committee Act: Advisory Committee Process Appears to Be Working, but Some Concerns Exist;
            </searchTitle>
</extension>
<subject>
 <topic>Congressional/executive relations</topic>
 <topic>Executive orders</topic>
 <topic>Federal advisory bodies</topic>
 <topic>Surveys</topic>
 <topic>Congressional oversight</topic>
 <topic>Accountability</topic>
</subject>
</mods>