<mods xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3" version="3.3" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3 http://www.loc.gov/standards/mods/v3/mods-3-3.xsd" ID="P0b002ee18038805e">
<name type="corporate">
 <namePart>United States Government Publishing Office</namePart>
 <role>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">publisher</roleTerm>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="code">pbl</roleTerm>
</role>
 <role>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">distributor</roleTerm>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="code">dst</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="corporate">
 <namePart>United States</namePart>
 <namePart>Government Accountability Office</namePart>
 <namePart>General Government Division</namePart>
 <role>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">author</roleTerm>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="code">aut</roleTerm>
</role>
 <description>Government Organization</description>
</name>
<typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource>
<genre authority="marcgt">government publication</genre>
<language>
 <languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm>
</language>
<extension>
 <collectionCode>GAOREPORTS</collectionCode>
 <category>Legislative Agency Publications</category>
 <waisDatabaseName>gao</waisDatabaseName>
 <branch>legislative</branch>
 <dateIngested>2010-08-12</dateIngested>
</extension>
<originInfo>
 <publisher>U.S. Government Printing Office</publisher>
 <dateIssued encoding="w3cdtf">1997-06-18</dateIssued>
 <issuance>monographic</issuance>
</originInfo>
<physicalDescription>
 <note type="source content type">deposited</note>
 <digitalOrigin>born digital</digitalOrigin>
 <extent>14 p.</extent>
</physicalDescription>
<classification authority="sudocs">GA 1.13:T-GGD-97-134</classification>
<identifier type="uri">https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/GAOREPORTS-T-GGD-97-134</identifier>
<identifier type="local">P0b002ee18038805e</identifier>
<identifier type="former package identifier">f:gg97134t</identifier>
<recordInfo>
 <recordContentSource authority="marcorg">DGPO</recordContentSource>
 <recordCreationDate encoding="w3cdtf">2010-08-12</recordCreationDate>
 <recordChangeDate encoding="w3cdtf">2011-03-24</recordChangeDate>
 <recordIdentifier source="DGPO">GAOREPORTS-T-GGD-97-134</recordIdentifier>
 <recordOrigin>machine generated</recordOrigin>
 <languageOfCataloging>
  <languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm>
</languageOfCataloging>
</recordInfo>
<accessCondition type="GPO scope determination">fdlp</accessCondition>
<extension>
 <docClass>REPORT</docClass>
 <accessId>GAOREPORTS-T-GGD-97-134</accessId>
 <reportNumber>T-GGD-97-134</reportNumber>
 <subject>Competitive procurement</subject>
 <subject>Federal procurement</subject>
 <subject>Contract monitoring</subject>
 <subject>Federal procurement policies</subject>
 <subject>Privatization</subject>
 <subject>Proposed legislation</subject>
 <subject>Strategic planning</subject>
 <identifier>Georgia</identifier>
 <identifier>Massachusetts</identifier>
 <identifier>Michigan</identifier>
 <identifier>New York</identifier>
 <identifier>Virginia</identifier>
 <identifier>Indianapolis (IN)</identifier>
 <type>Testimony</type>
 <seriesAbbrev>GGD</seriesAbbrev>
</extension>
<titleInfo>
 <title>Privatization and Competition: Comments on S. 314, The Freedom From Government Competition Act</title>
</titleInfo>
<abstract>Pursuant to a congressional request, GAO discussed S. 314, the Freedom
From Government Competition Act, as a potential vehicle for competitive
contracting, using the results of GAO&apos;s recent work on privatization
initiatives at the state and local government levels.&lt;p/&gt;GAO noted that: (1) in the six governments GAO visited, a political
leader, or in one case several leaders working in concert, played a
crucial role in fostering privatization; (2) S. 314 does not, and
probably cannot, provide for effective political leadership; (3) S. 314
would give the force of law to general reliance on the private sector
for commercial goods and services, and thus would provide a stronger
foundation, but not a substitute, for political leadership; (4) to
implement their privatization initiatives, the governments GAO visited
reported the need to establish an organizational and analytical
structure; (5) responding to the need to such a centralized structure,
S. 314 would require the Office of Management and Budget to issue
regulations and to establish a new &quot;Center for Commercial Activities,&quot;;
(6) the bill would amend the Government Performance and Results Act by
requiring that agencies include in the annual performance plans and
reports that they submit to Congress: (a) an inventory of functions that
are subject to the act&apos;s provisions; and (b) a schedule for converting
the functions identified in the performance plan; (7) if Congress
chooses to enact S. 314, an opportunity exists to further integrate
implementation of the bill&apos;s provisions with GPRA; (8) while providing a
statutory basis for competitively contracting out government functions,
S. 314 has implications for certain existing laws, and how it will
relate to existing laws and policies is not entirely clear; (9) a
notable feature of the draft legislation is the provision describing the
criteria that are to be used in contracting for goods and services; (10)
efforts are under way to develop the type of cost and performance data
that would be necessary to compare public versus private proposals, as
could occur under the provisions of S. 314; (11) the bill&apos;s findings
section states that it is in the public interest for the private section
to utilize government employees who are adversely affected by
conversions of functions to the private sector; (12) the essential
foundation for effective oversight is good cost and performance data,
and S. 314&apos;s analytical requirements call for the consideration of all
direct and indirect costs, qualifications, and past performance; and
(13) these requirements, along with the authority and flexibility given
to OMB in implementing the legislation, provide the necessary foundatio*</abstract>
<location>
 <url displayLabel="HTML rendition" access="raw object">https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/GAOREPORTS-T-GGD-97-134/html/GAOREPORTS-T-GGD-97-134.htm</url>
 <url displayLabel="PDF rendition" access="raw object">https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/GAOREPORTS-T-GGD-97-134/pdf/GAOREPORTS-T-GGD-97-134.pdf</url>
</location>
<identifier type="preferred citation">GAO/T-GGD-97-134</identifier>
<location>
 <url displayLabel="Content Detail" access="object in context">https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/GAOREPORTS-T-GGD-97-134</url>
</location>
<note>Testimony</note>
<extension>
 <searchTitle>GAO/T-GGD-97-134; Privatization and Competition: Comments on S. 314, The Freedom From Government Competition Act;
            </searchTitle>
</extension>
<subject>
 <topic>Competitive procurement</topic>
 <topic>Federal procurement</topic>
 <topic>Contract monitoring</topic>
 <topic>Federal procurement policies</topic>
 <topic>Privatization</topic>
 <topic>Proposed legislation</topic>
 <topic>Strategic planning</topic>
 <topic>Georgia</topic>
 <topic>Massachusetts</topic>
 <topic>Michigan</topic>
 <topic>New York</topic>
 <topic>Virginia</topic>
 <topic>Indianapolis (IN)</topic>
</subject>
</mods>