<mods xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3" version="3.3" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3 http://www.loc.gov/standards/mods/v3/mods-3-3.xsd" ID="P0b002ee180371d93">
<name type="corporate">
 <namePart>United States Government Publishing Office</namePart>
 <role>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">publisher</roleTerm>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="code">pbl</roleTerm>
</role>
 <role>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">distributor</roleTerm>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="code">dst</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="corporate">
 <namePart>United States</namePart>
 <namePart>Government Accountability Office</namePart>
 <namePart>General Government Division</namePart>
 <role>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">author</roleTerm>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="code">aut</roleTerm>
</role>
 <description>Government Organization</description>
</name>
<typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource>
<genre authority="marcgt">government publication</genre>
<language>
 <languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm>
</language>
<extension>
 <collectionCode>GAOREPORTS</collectionCode>
 <category>Legislative Agency Publications</category>
 <waisDatabaseName>gao</waisDatabaseName>
 <branch>legislative</branch>
 <dateIngested>2010-08-12</dateIngested>
</extension>
<originInfo>
 <publisher>U.S. Government Printing Office</publisher>
 <dateIssued encoding="w3cdtf">1997-05-15</dateIssued>
 <issuance>monographic</issuance>
</originInfo>
<physicalDescription>
 <note type="source content type">deposited</note>
 <digitalOrigin>born digital</digitalOrigin>
 <extent>13 p.</extent>
</physicalDescription>
<classification authority="sudocs">GA 1.13:T-GGD-97-107</classification>
<identifier type="uri">https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/GAOREPORTS-T-GGD-97-107</identifier>
<identifier type="local">P0b002ee180371d93</identifier>
<identifier type="former package identifier">f:gg97107t</identifier>
<recordInfo>
 <recordContentSource authority="marcorg">DGPO</recordContentSource>
 <recordCreationDate encoding="w3cdtf">2010-08-12</recordCreationDate>
 <recordChangeDate encoding="w3cdtf">2011-03-24</recordChangeDate>
 <recordIdentifier source="DGPO">GAOREPORTS-T-GGD-97-107</recordIdentifier>
 <recordOrigin>machine generated</recordOrigin>
 <languageOfCataloging>
  <languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm>
</languageOfCataloging>
</recordInfo>
<accessCondition type="GPO scope determination">fdlp</accessCondition>
<extension>
 <docClass>REPORT</docClass>
 <accessId>GAOREPORTS-T-GGD-97-107</accessId>
 <reportNumber>T-GGD-97-107</reportNumber>
 <subject>Customs administration</subject>
 <subject>Human resources utilization</subject>
 <subject>Labor-management relations</subject>
 <subject>Federal personnel law</subject>
 <subject>Drug trafficking</subject>
 <subject>Law enforcement</subject>
 <subject>Overtime compensation</subject>
 <subject>Government employee unions</subject>
 <subject>Financial management systems</subject>
 <subject>Differential pay</subject>
 <identifier>Customs Service Operation Hard Line</identifier>
 <identifier>Customs Service Line Release System</identifier>
 <type>Testimony</type>
 <seriesAbbrev>GGD</seriesAbbrev>
 <congReport congress="103" number="111" type="H"></congReport>
</extension>
<titleInfo>
 <title>U.S. Customs Service: Oversight Issues</title>
</titleInfo>
<abstract>GAO discussed the Customs Service&apos;s drug interdiction efforts,
labor-management partnership concept, and issues related to inspectional
overtime.&lt;p/&gt;GAO noted that: (1) its 1996 report on Customs&apos; drug interdiction
efforts identified and described the key elements, resources, costs, and
performance measures of Customs&apos; national drug interdiction program as
well as those of its investigative offices and selected ports; (2)
Customs&apos; challenges included how to: (a) effectively interdict drugs and
enforce trade laws while facilitating border crossings; and (b) develop
performance measures that gauge the effectiveness of its drug
interdiction activities; (3) its March 1997 testimony discussed
labor-management activities within Customs; (4) in June 1994, Customs
and the National Treasury Employees Union (NTEU) entered into a
partnership agreement that established 19 goals, set up a National
Partnership Council, and stated that NTEU will participate in agency
meetings that affect the workforce; (5) GAO&apos;s limited work revealed that
most of the Customs managers and NTEU chapter presidents GAO interviewed
characterized their relationship as better while first-line supervisors&apos;
views were more evenly distributed from &quot;much better&quot; to &quot;much worse&quot;;
(6) Customs did not have any plans for an evaluation of the impact of
the partnership approach on its mission and GAO concluded that since the
partnership was almost 3 years old, it was not too soon for Customs to
develop a formal plan for evaluating it; (7) in 1991, GAO reported that
overtime pay to Customs inspectors had increased from about $57 million
in fiscal year (FY) 1985 to about $103 million in FY 1990; (8) GAO
concluded that an important cause was Customs&apos; focus on ensuring that
inspectors did not exceed the $25,000 cap instituted by Congress in 1983
and its disregard of the individual overtime assignments that build to
the cap; (9) GAO also concluded that original overtime provisions
hindered efficient management and that the special payments were
premised on conditions that no longer existed; (10) GAO recommended
that: (a) overtime pay be more directly linked to actual hours worked;
and (b) overtime be used more efficiently; (11) the 1993 Customs
Officers Pay Reform Amendments (COPRA) were intended to more closely
match earnings to hours worked; (12) however, the Treasury Inspector
General (IG) reported in September 1996 that although COPRA reduced
direct spending associated with overtime pay, it caused a significant
increase in the costs associated with night differential pay in fiscal *</abstract>
<location>
 <url displayLabel="HTML rendition" access="raw object">https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/GAOREPORTS-T-GGD-97-107/html/GAOREPORTS-T-GGD-97-107.htm</url>
 <url displayLabel="PDF rendition" access="raw object">https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/GAOREPORTS-T-GGD-97-107/pdf/GAOREPORTS-T-GGD-97-107.pdf</url>
</location>
<identifier type="preferred citation">GAO/T-GGD-97-107</identifier>
<location>
 <url displayLabel="Content Detail" access="object in context">https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/GAOREPORTS-T-GGD-97-107</url>
</location>
<note>Testimony</note>
<extension>
 <searchTitle>GAO/T-GGD-97-107; U.S. Customs Service: Oversight Issues;
            </searchTitle>
</extension>
<subject>
 <topic>Customs administration</topic>
 <topic>Human resources utilization</topic>
 <topic>Labor-management relations</topic>
 <topic>Federal personnel law</topic>
 <topic>Drug trafficking</topic>
 <topic>Law enforcement</topic>
 <topic>Overtime compensation</topic>
 <topic>Government employee unions</topic>
 <topic>Financial management systems</topic>
 <topic>Differential pay</topic>
 <topic>Customs Service Operation Hard Line</topic>
 <topic>Customs Service Line Release System</topic>
</subject>
<relatedItem type="isReferencedBy">
 <titleInfo>
  <title>United States House Report 111 (103rd Congress)</title>
</titleInfo>
 <identifier type="congressional report citation">H. Rept. 103-111</identifier>
</relatedItem>
</mods>