<mods xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3" version="3.3" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3 http://www.loc.gov/standards/mods/v3/mods-3-3.xsd" ID="P0b002ee180370930">
<name type="corporate">
 <namePart>United States Government Publishing Office</namePart>
 <role>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">publisher</roleTerm>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="code">pbl</roleTerm>
</role>
 <role>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">distributor</roleTerm>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="code">dst</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="corporate">
 <namePart>United States</namePart>
 <namePart>Government Accountability Office</namePart>
 <namePart>General Government Division</namePart>
 <role>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">author</roleTerm>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="code">aut</roleTerm>
</role>
 <description>Government Organization</description>
</name>
<typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource>
<genre authority="marcgt">government publication</genre>
<language>
 <languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm>
</language>
<extension>
 <collectionCode>GAOREPORTS</collectionCode>
 <category>Legislative Agency Publications</category>
 <waisDatabaseName>gao</waisDatabaseName>
 <branch>legislative</branch>
 <dateIngested>2010-08-12</dateIngested>
</extension>
<originInfo>
 <publisher>U.S. Government Printing Office</publisher>
 <dateIssued encoding="w3cdtf">1996-07-16</dateIssued>
 <issuance>monographic</issuance>
</originInfo>
<physicalDescription>
 <note type="source content type">deposited</note>
 <digitalOrigin>born digital</digitalOrigin>
 <extent>21 p.</extent>
</physicalDescription>
<classification authority="sudocs">GA 1.13:T-GGD-96-153</classification>
<identifier type="uri">https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/GAOREPORTS-T-GGD-96-153</identifier>
<identifier type="local">P0b002ee180370930</identifier>
<identifier type="former package identifier">f:gg96153t</identifier>
<recordInfo>
 <recordContentSource authority="marcorg">DGPO</recordContentSource>
 <recordCreationDate encoding="w3cdtf">2010-08-12</recordCreationDate>
 <recordChangeDate encoding="w3cdtf">2011-03-24</recordChangeDate>
 <recordIdentifier source="DGPO">GAOREPORTS-T-GGD-96-153</recordIdentifier>
 <recordOrigin>machine generated</recordOrigin>
 <languageOfCataloging>
  <languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm>
</languageOfCataloging>
</recordInfo>
<accessCondition type="GPO scope determination">fdlp</accessCondition>
<extension>
 <docClass>REPORT</docClass>
 <accessId>GAOREPORTS-T-GGD-96-153</accessId>
 <reportNumber>T-GGD-96-153</reportNumber>
 <subject>Currency and coinage</subject>
 <subject>Cost control</subject>
 <subject>Economic analysis</subject>
 <subject>Monetary policies</subject>
 <subject>Contractor personnel</subject>
 <subject>Administrative costs</subject>
 <subject>Overhead costs</subject>
 <subject>Proposed legislation</subject>
 <subject>Cost effectiveness analysis</subject>
 <subject>Public relations</subject>
 <identifier>Civil Service Retirement System</identifier>
 <type>Testimony</type>
 <seriesAbbrev>GGD</seriesAbbrev>
</extension>
<titleInfo>
 <title>Future of the Penny: Options for Congressional Consideration</title>
</titleInfo>
<abstract>GAO discussed the continued production of the U.S. penny. GAO noted
that: (1) Congress needs to address several issues in deciding the
future of the penny; (2) the government spent $8.5 million to $9.2
million in fiscal year (FY) 1994 distributing and handling pennies; (3)
public attitudes towards the penny are mixed, but the majority of the
public supports retaining the penny; (4) in FY 1995, almost 66 percent
of pennies did not circulate compared to almost 12 percent of quarters;
(5) it could not determine the full budgetary impact of eliminating the
penny, but the U.S. Mint would be negatively impacted if billions of
pennies were returned; (6) eliminating the penny would result in the
loss of jobs for the two contractors who produce zinc penny blanks and
for other related businesses; (7) states&apos; ability to collect sales taxes
would not be affected by the elimination of the penny, but charitable
donations might be affected; (8) penny production and disposal cause no
signigicant environmental problems; (9) proposed legislation would
provide a framework for rounding to the nearest nickel and would exempt
noncash transactions from the rounding requirement; and (10) military
facilities in Europe eliminated the penny in 1980 and received few
complaints.</abstract>
<location>
 <url displayLabel="HTML rendition" access="raw object">https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/GAOREPORTS-T-GGD-96-153/html/GAOREPORTS-T-GGD-96-153.htm</url>
 <url displayLabel="PDF rendition" access="raw object">https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/GAOREPORTS-T-GGD-96-153/pdf/GAOREPORTS-T-GGD-96-153.pdf</url>
</location>
<identifier type="preferred citation">GAO/T-GGD-96-153</identifier>
<location>
 <url displayLabel="Content Detail" access="object in context">https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/GAOREPORTS-T-GGD-96-153</url>
</location>
<note>Testimony</note>
<extension>
 <searchTitle>GAO/T-GGD-96-153; Future of the Penny: Options for Congressional Consideration;
            </searchTitle>
</extension>
<subject>
 <topic>Currency and coinage</topic>
 <topic>Cost control</topic>
 <topic>Economic analysis</topic>
 <topic>Monetary policies</topic>
 <topic>Contractor personnel</topic>
 <topic>Administrative costs</topic>
 <topic>Overhead costs</topic>
 <topic>Proposed legislation</topic>
 <topic>Cost effectiveness analysis</topic>
 <topic>Public relations</topic>
 <topic>Civil Service Retirement System</topic>
</subject>
</mods>