<mods xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3" version="3.3" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3 http://www.loc.gov/standards/mods/v3/mods-3-3.xsd" ID="P0b002ee18037224a">
<name type="corporate">
 <namePart>United States Government Publishing Office</namePart>
 <role>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">publisher</roleTerm>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="code">pbl</roleTerm>
</role>
 <role>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">distributor</roleTerm>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="code">dst</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="corporate">
 <namePart>United States</namePart>
 <namePart>Government Accountability Office</namePart>
 <namePart>General Government Division</namePart>
 <role>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">author</roleTerm>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="code">aut</roleTerm>
</role>
 <description>Government Organization</description>
</name>
<typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource>
<genre authority="marcgt">government publication</genre>
<language>
 <languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm>
</language>
<extension>
 <collectionCode>GAOREPORTS</collectionCode>
 <category>Legislative Agency Publications</category>
 <waisDatabaseName>gao</waisDatabaseName>
 <branch>legislative</branch>
 <dateIngested>2010-08-12</dateIngested>
</extension>
<originInfo>
 <publisher>U.S. Government Printing Office</publisher>
 <dateIssued encoding="w3cdtf">1994-02-01</dateIssued>
 <issuance>monographic</issuance>
</originInfo>
<physicalDescription>
 <note type="source content type">deposited</note>
 <digitalOrigin>born digital</digitalOrigin>
</physicalDescription>
<classification authority="sudocs">GA 1.13:T-GGD-94-87</classification>
<identifier type="uri">https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/GAOREPORTS-T-GGD-94-87</identifier>
<identifier type="local">P0b002ee18037224a</identifier>
<identifier type="former package identifier">f:tgg94087</identifier>
<recordInfo>
 <recordContentSource authority="marcorg">DGPO</recordContentSource>
 <recordCreationDate encoding="w3cdtf">2010-08-12</recordCreationDate>
 <recordChangeDate encoding="w3cdtf">2011-03-24</recordChangeDate>
 <recordIdentifier source="DGPO">GAOREPORTS-T-GGD-94-87</recordIdentifier>
 <recordOrigin>machine generated</recordOrigin>
 <languageOfCataloging>
  <languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm>
</languageOfCataloging>
</recordInfo>
<accessCondition type="GPO scope determination">fdlp</accessCondition>
<extension>
 <docClass>REPORT</docClass>
 <accessId>GAOREPORTS-T-GGD-94-87</accessId>
 <reportNumber>T-GGD-94-87</reportNumber>
 <subject>Reductions in force</subject>
 <subject>Minorities</subject>
 <subject>Women</subject>
 <subject>Labor statistics</subject>
 <subject>Fair employment programs</subject>
 <subject>Employment of minorities</subject>
 <subject>Personnel management</subject>
 <subject>Employee incentives</subject>
 <subject>Civilian employees</subject>
 <subject>Personnel evaluation systems</subject>
 <identifier>National Performance Review</identifier>
 <type>Testimony</type>
 <seriesAbbrev>GGD</seriesAbbrev>
</extension>
<titleInfo>
 <title>Federal Personnel: The EEO Implications of Reductions-In-Force</title>
</titleInfo>
<abstract>In a recent review of reductions-in-force (RIF) at three Defense
Department installations, GAO discovered that the RIFs caused a
disproportionate number of women and minorities to lose their jobs.  In
some cases, this was because women and minorities lacked the tenure,
veterans&apos; preference, or performance-adjusted seniority of nonminorities
or men.  In other cases, minorities held a large number of the jobs
being abolished and they lacked assignment rights to other positions.
Continuing RIFs may undermine the gains made by women and minorities in
the workforce, particularly at the mid and higher levels.  On the other
hand, downsizing alternatives that encourage voluntary retirements and
resignations may prompt larger numbers of white males to leave on their
own initiative, a trend that could improve the overall diversity of the
smaller workforce.  This was the case during GAO&apos;s own recent workforce
reduction, which included a special cash separation incentive.</abstract>
<location>
 <url displayLabel="HTML rendition" access="raw object">https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/GAOREPORTS-T-GGD-94-87/html/GAOREPORTS-T-GGD-94-87.htm</url>
</location>
<identifier type="preferred citation">GAO/T-GGD-94-87</identifier>
<location>
 <url displayLabel="Content Detail" access="object in context">https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/GAOREPORTS-T-GGD-94-87</url>
</location>
<note>Testimony</note>
<extension>
 <searchTitle>GAO/T-GGD-94-87; Federal Personnel: The EEO Implications of Reductions-In-Force;
            </searchTitle>
</extension>
<subject>
 <topic>Reductions in force</topic>
 <topic>Minorities</topic>
 <topic>Women</topic>
 <topic>Labor statistics</topic>
 <topic>Fair employment programs</topic>
 <topic>Employment of minorities</topic>
 <topic>Personnel management</topic>
 <topic>Employee incentives</topic>
 <topic>Civilian employees</topic>
 <topic>Personnel evaluation systems</topic>
 <topic>National Performance Review</topic>
</subject>
</mods>