<mods xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3" version="3.3" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3 http://www.loc.gov/standards/mods/v3/mods-3-3.xsd" ID="P0b002ee180377f50">
<name type="corporate">
 <namePart>United States Government Publishing Office</namePart>
 <role>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">publisher</roleTerm>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="code">pbl</roleTerm>
</role>
 <role>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">distributor</roleTerm>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="code">dst</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="corporate">
 <namePart>United States</namePart>
 <namePart>Government Accountability Office</namePart>
 <namePart>Accounting and Information Management Division</namePart>
 <role>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">author</roleTerm>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="code">aut</roleTerm>
</role>
 <description>Government Organization</description>
</name>
<typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource>
<genre authority="marcgt">government publication</genre>
<language>
 <languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm>
</language>
<extension>
 <collectionCode>GAOREPORTS</collectionCode>
 <category>Legislative Agency Publications</category>
 <waisDatabaseName>gao</waisDatabaseName>
 <branch>legislative</branch>
 <dateIngested>2010-08-12</dateIngested>
</extension>
<originInfo>
 <publisher>U.S. Government Printing Office</publisher>
 <dateIssued encoding="w3cdtf">1999-09-24</dateIssued>
 <issuance>monographic</issuance>
</originInfo>
<physicalDescription>
 <note type="source content type">deposited</note>
 <digitalOrigin>born digital</digitalOrigin>
</physicalDescription>
<classification authority="sudocs">GA 1.13:T-AIMD-99-298</classification>
<identifier type="uri">https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/GAOREPORTS-T-AIMD-99-298</identifier>
<identifier type="local">P0b002ee180377f50</identifier>
<identifier type="former package identifier">f:ai99298t</identifier>
<recordInfo>
 <recordContentSource authority="marcorg">DGPO</recordContentSource>
 <recordCreationDate encoding="w3cdtf">2010-08-12</recordCreationDate>
 <recordChangeDate encoding="w3cdtf">2011-03-28</recordChangeDate>
 <recordIdentifier source="DGPO">GAOREPORTS-T-AIMD-99-298</recordIdentifier>
 <recordOrigin>machine generated</recordOrigin>
 <languageOfCataloging>
  <languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm>
</languageOfCataloging>
</recordInfo>
<accessCondition type="GPO scope determination">fdlp</accessCondition>
<extension>
 <docClass>REPORT</docClass>
 <accessId>GAOREPORTS-T-AIMD-99-298</accessId>
 <reportNumber>T-AIMD-99-298</reportNumber>
 <subject>Y2K</subject>
 <subject>Internal controls</subject>
 <subject>Accountability</subject>
 <subject>Financial records</subject>
 <subject>Future budget projections</subject>
 <subject>Systems conversions</subject>
 <subject>Computer software</subject>
 <subject>Computer software verification and validation</subject>
 <subject>Funds management</subject>
 <identifier>Y2K</identifier>
 <identifier>DC Highway Trust Fund</identifier>
 <identifier>District of Columbia</identifier>
 <type>Testimony</type>
 <seriesAbbrev>AIMD</seriesAbbrev>
</extension>
<titleInfo>
 <title>Year 2000 Computing Challenge: The District of Columbia</title>
</titleInfo>
<abstract>Pursuant to a congressional request, GAO discussed the District of
Columbia&apos;s financial management issues related to its year 2000 efforts,
focusing on the: (1) funds provided and the District&apos;s reported
expenditures to date; (2) District&apos;s ability to track its year 2000
costs; and (3) additional funding requested by the District.&lt;p/&gt;GAO noted that: (1) the District is acutely vulnerable to year 2000
problems due to its widespread dependence on computer systems for
delivering important public services; (2) if these problems are not
solved before the end of the year, the District may be unable to
effectively carry out its core business operations that ensure public
safety, collect revenue, educate students, and provide health care
services; (3) District officials are aware of the urgency of this task
and have made several funding requests in order to have adequate
resources to address it; (4) the District&apos;s records indicated that $97.8
million had been provided for year 2000 efforts as of September 20,
1999; (5) of the $97.8 million provided, $42.4 million had been spent
and $53.8 million had been obligated, leaving available funds of $1.6
million; (6) these draft financial reports also showed disallowed costs
of $12.5 million; (7) District officials told GAO that these disallowed
costs resulted from recent reviews of amounts billed by contractors; (8)
District officials said that they have had significant problems in
tracking year 2000 costs and expenditures, which they attribute
primarily to the frequent turnover in key financial positions; (9) GAO
received inconsistent and unreliable cost data from several District
officials and the cost schedules continued to change; (10) it was
apparent that the District does not have reliable financial data to
manage the year 2000 project costs; (11) the District was not tracking
the year 2000 amounts obligated and spent and could not provide
reliable, supportable data to GAO related to these amounts; (12) the
District&apos;s difficulties in tracking its year 2000 costs make it
impossible to determine whether its year 2000 funds were spent properly;
(13) this situation also makes it difficult for the District to
reasonably determine additional funds needed to meet its future year
2000 challenges; (14) the District has requested $90.7 million in
additional funding from the Office of Management and Budget to complete
its year 2000 efforts; (15) District officials stated that these
additional funds would be used primarily for year 2000 remediation,
testing, contingency planning, and additional resource requirements at
the various District agencies; and (16) until the District can better
track its costs and improve the reliability of its financial data, it
cannot assure Congress that the additional funds requested will be spent
as intended.</abstract>
<location>
 <url displayLabel="HTML rendition" access="raw object">https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/GAOREPORTS-T-AIMD-99-298/html/GAOREPORTS-T-AIMD-99-298.htm</url>
 <url displayLabel="PDF rendition" access="raw object">https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/GAOREPORTS-T-AIMD-99-298/pdf/GAOREPORTS-T-AIMD-99-298.pdf</url>
</location>
<identifier type="preferred citation">GAO/T-AIMD-99-298</identifier>
<location>
 <url displayLabel="Content Detail" access="object in context">https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/GAOREPORTS-T-AIMD-99-298</url>
</location>
<note>Testimony</note>
<extension>
 <searchTitle>GAO/T-AIMD-99-298; Year 2000 Computing Challenge: The District of Columbia;
            </searchTitle>
</extension>
<subject>
 <topic>Y2K</topic>
 <topic>Internal controls</topic>
 <topic>Accountability</topic>
 <topic>Financial records</topic>
 <topic>Future budget projections</topic>
 <topic>Systems conversions</topic>
 <topic>Computer software</topic>
 <topic>Computer software verification and validation</topic>
 <topic>Funds management</topic>
 <topic>Y2K</topic>
 <topic>DC Highway Trust Fund</topic>
 <topic>District of Columbia</topic>
</subject>
</mods>