<mods xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3" version="3.3" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3 http://www.loc.gov/standards/mods/v3/mods-3-3.xsd" ID="P0b002ee180381a9b">
<name type="corporate">
 <namePart>United States Government Publishing Office</namePart>
 <role>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">publisher</roleTerm>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="code">pbl</roleTerm>
</role>
 <role>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">distributor</roleTerm>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="code">dst</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="corporate">
 <namePart>United States</namePart>
 <namePart>Government Accountability Office</namePart>
 <namePart>Accounting and Information Management Division</namePart>
 <role>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">author</roleTerm>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="code">aut</roleTerm>
</role>
 <description>Government Organization</description>
</name>
<typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource>
<genre authority="marcgt">government publication</genre>
<language>
 <languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm>
</language>
<extension>
 <collectionCode>GAOREPORTS</collectionCode>
 <category>Legislative Agency Publications</category>
 <waisDatabaseName>gao</waisDatabaseName>
 <branch>legislative</branch>
 <dateIngested>2010-08-12</dateIngested>
</extension>
<originInfo>
 <publisher>U.S. Government Printing Office</publisher>
 <dateIssued encoding="w3cdtf">1994-08-11</dateIssued>
 <issuance>monographic</issuance>
</originInfo>
<physicalDescription>
 <note type="source content type">deposited</note>
 <digitalOrigin>born digital</digitalOrigin>
</physicalDescription>
<classification authority="sudocs">GA 1.13:T-AIMD-94-173</classification>
<identifier type="uri">https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/GAOREPORTS-T-AIMD-94-173</identifier>
<identifier type="local">P0b002ee180381a9b</identifier>
<identifier type="former package identifier">f:tai94173</identifier>
<recordInfo>
 <recordContentSource authority="marcorg">DGPO</recordContentSource>
 <recordCreationDate encoding="w3cdtf">2010-08-12</recordCreationDate>
 <recordChangeDate encoding="w3cdtf">2011-03-28</recordChangeDate>
 <recordIdentifier source="DGPO">GAOREPORTS-T-AIMD-94-173</recordIdentifier>
 <recordOrigin>machine generated</recordOrigin>
 <languageOfCataloging>
  <languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm>
</languageOfCataloging>
</recordInfo>
<accessCondition type="GPO scope determination">fdlp</accessCondition>
<extension>
 <docClass>REPORT</docClass>
 <accessId>GAOREPORTS-T-AIMD-94-173</accessId>
 <reportNumber>T-AIMD-94-173</reportNumber>
 <subject>Intelligence gathering operations</subject>
 <subject>Telecommunications operations</subject>
 <subject>Proposed legislation</subject>
 <subject>Law enforcement agencies</subject>
 <subject>Law enforcement</subject>
 <subject>Telecommunications equipment</subject>
 <subject>Interagency relations</subject>
 <subject>Research and development costs</subject>
 <subject>Cost control</subject>
 <subject>Crime prevention</subject>
 <type>Testimony</type>
 <seriesAbbrev>AIMD</seriesAbbrev>
</extension>
<titleInfo>
 <title>Electronic Surveillance: Technologies Continue to Pose Challenges</title>
</titleInfo>
<abstract>In 1992, GAO reported that the ability of law enforcement agencies to
execute court-approved wiretaps was challenged by advanced
telecommunications technology.  To determine changes in the state of
technology since that time, GAO interviewed representatives from law
enforcement organizations, telephone service providers and manufacturing
companies.  These discussions revealed that although some technological
solutions have been developed to facilitate law enforcement agencies&apos;
wiretap efforts, other technology changes have made it more difficult
for them to use traditional wiretap methods.  While these agencies are
still able to conduct most court-approved wiretaps, they report that
investigations were delayed or court orders simply were not pursued
because of these problems.  In addition, industry representatives told
GAO that there are current and imminent technological situations that
would be difficult to wiretap, even though they have not yet received
wiretap court orders for those situations.</abstract>
<location>
 <url displayLabel="HTML rendition" access="raw object">https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/GAOREPORTS-T-AIMD-94-173/html/GAOREPORTS-T-AIMD-94-173.htm</url>
</location>
<identifier type="preferred citation">GAO/T-AIMD-94-173</identifier>
<location>
 <url displayLabel="Content Detail" access="object in context">https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/GAOREPORTS-T-AIMD-94-173</url>
</location>
<note>Testimony</note>
<extension>
 <searchTitle>GAO/T-AIMD-94-173; Electronic Surveillance: Technologies Continue to Pose Challenges;
            </searchTitle>
</extension>
<subject>
 <topic>Intelligence gathering operations</topic>
 <topic>Telecommunications operations</topic>
 <topic>Proposed legislation</topic>
 <topic>Law enforcement agencies</topic>
 <topic>Law enforcement</topic>
 <topic>Telecommunications equipment</topic>
 <topic>Interagency relations</topic>
 <topic>Research and development costs</topic>
 <topic>Cost control</topic>
 <topic>Crime prevention</topic>
</subject>
</mods>