<mods xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3" version="3.3" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3 http://www.loc.gov/standards/mods/v3/mods-3-3.xsd" ID="P0b002ee18037e22c">
<name type="corporate">
 <namePart>United States Government Publishing Office</namePart>
 <role>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">publisher</roleTerm>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="code">pbl</roleTerm>
</role>
 <role>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">distributor</roleTerm>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="code">dst</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="corporate">
 <namePart>United States</namePart>
 <namePart>Government Accountability Office</namePart>
 <namePart>Accounting and Information Management Division</namePart>
 <role>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">author</roleTerm>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="code">aut</roleTerm>
</role>
 <description>Government Organization</description>
</name>
<typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource>
<genre authority="marcgt">government publication</genre>
<language>
 <languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm>
</language>
<extension>
 <collectionCode>GAOREPORTS</collectionCode>
 <category>Legislative Agency Publications</category>
 <waisDatabaseName>gao</waisDatabaseName>
 <branch>legislative</branch>
 <dateIngested>2010-08-12</dateIngested>
</extension>
<originInfo>
 <publisher>U.S. Government Printing Office</publisher>
 <dateIssued encoding="w3cdtf">2000-06-08</dateIssued>
 <issuance>monographic</issuance>
</originInfo>
<physicalDescription>
 <note type="source content type">deposited</note>
 <digitalOrigin>born digital</digitalOrigin>
 <extent>34 p.</extent>
</physicalDescription>
<classification authority="sudocs">GA 1.13:T-AIMD-00-213</classification>
<identifier type="uri">https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/GAOREPORTS-T-AIMD-00-213</identifier>
<identifier type="local">P0b002ee18037e22c</identifier>
<identifier type="former package identifier">f:ai00213t</identifier>
<recordInfo>
 <recordContentSource authority="marcorg">DGPO</recordContentSource>
 <recordCreationDate encoding="w3cdtf">2010-08-12</recordCreationDate>
 <recordChangeDate encoding="w3cdtf">2011-03-28</recordChangeDate>
 <recordIdentifier source="DGPO">GAOREPORTS-T-AIMD-00-213</recordIdentifier>
 <recordOrigin>machine generated</recordOrigin>
 <languageOfCataloging>
  <languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm>
</languageOfCataloging>
</recordInfo>
<accessCondition type="GPO scope determination">fdlp</accessCondition>
<extension>
 <docClass>REPORT</docClass>
 <accessId>GAOREPORTS-T-AIMD-00-213</accessId>
 <reportNumber>T-AIMD-00-213</reportNumber>
 <subject>Financial management</subject>
 <subject>Debt collection</subject>
 <subject>Debt</subject>
 <subject>Interagency relations</subject>
 <subject>Government collections</subject>
 <identifier>FMS, Payments, Claims, and Enhanced Reconciliation System</identifier>
 <type>Testimony</type>
 <seriesAbbrev>AIMD</seriesAbbrev>
 <USCode title="11">
                      <section number="362"></section>
                </USCode>
</extension>
<titleInfo>
 <title>Debt Collection: Treasury Faces Challenges in Implementing</title>
</titleInfo>
<abstract>Pursuant to a congressional request, GAO discussed the Department of the
Treasury&apos;s progress in implementing the cross-service provision of the
Debt Collection Improvement Act (DCIA) of 1996, focusing on the: (1)
status of nontax delinquent debts that federal agencies have referred to
the Treasury for cross-servicing and the Treasury&apos;s actions to encourage
these referrals; (2) Treasury&apos;s cross-servicing process for collecting
referred debts; (3) Treasury&apos;s method for allocating debts to private
collection agencies (PCA) for collection; and (4) Treasury&apos;s estimated
cross-servicing costs and related fees earned on collections.&lt;p/&gt;GAO noted that: (1) several agencies&apos; reporting of debt balances and
related aging was not accurate, and the accuracy and completeness of
significant amounts reported as exclusions from cross-servicing were not
required to be and were not independently verified; (2) for various
reasons, many debts eligible for referral by certain agencies were
delayed in being referred or simply not referred even though the
Financial Management Service (FMS) took steps to encourage agencies to
refer such debt; (3) in addition, even when agencies referred debts, the
debts were not always valid and legally enforceable and thus not
eligible for cross-servicing; (4) DCIA authorize Treasury to designate
other government agencies as debt collection centers based on their
performance in collecting delinquent claims owed to the government; (5)
Tresury established standards for agencies that wanted to be a debt
collection center; (6) three agencies have applied to be governmentwide
debt collection centers, but were not found by Treasury to have the
needed capabilities; (7) only FMS is operating a governmentwide
cross-servicing debt collection center; (8) FMS developed a methodology
for distributing debts to PCAs for collection that FMS intended to be
performance based; (9) for each distribution, FMS placed all the debts
available into a pool and applied a systematic process to distribute the
debts to PCAs; (10) GAO&apos;s analysis of the debts found that the debts
within each distribution&apos;s pool were generally not of the same
composition; (11) GAO&apos;s analysis of FMS&apos; distribution of debt accounts
to PCA form February 1998 through February 2000 showed that one PCA had
received a significantly higher percentage of the debts with smaller
balances; (12) concerns relating to FMS&apos; distribution method have been
raised by some of the PCAs; (13) FMS has not covered its cross-servicing
costs through related fees collected and is not likely to in the near
future; and (14) based on FMS&apos; own estimated cross-servicing costs and
using the current fee structure and FMS&apos; fiscal year 1999 collection
experience, GAO determined that collection volume would need to rise
over sevenfold to put this operation on a full cost-recovery basis;</abstract>
<location>
 <url displayLabel="HTML rendition" access="raw object">https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/GAOREPORTS-T-AIMD-00-213/html/GAOREPORTS-T-AIMD-00-213.htm</url>
 <url displayLabel="PDF rendition" access="raw object">https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/GAOREPORTS-T-AIMD-00-213/pdf/GAOREPORTS-T-AIMD-00-213.pdf</url>
</location>
<identifier type="preferred citation">GAO/T-AIMD-00-213</identifier>
<location>
 <url displayLabel="Content Detail" access="object in context">https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/GAOREPORTS-T-AIMD-00-213</url>
</location>
<note>Testimony</note>
<extension>
 <searchTitle>GAO/T-AIMD-00-213; Debt Collection: Treasury Faces Challenges in Implementing;
            </searchTitle>
</extension>
<subject>
 <topic>Financial management</topic>
 <topic>Debt collection</topic>
 <topic>Debt</topic>
 <topic>Interagency relations</topic>
 <topic>Government collections</topic>
 <topic>FMS, Payments, Claims, and Enhanced Reconciliation System</topic>
</subject>
<relatedItem type="isReferencedBy">
 <titleInfo>
  <title>United States Code</title>
  <partNumber>Title 11 Section 362</partNumber>
</titleInfo>
 <identifier type="USC citation">11 U.S.C. 362</identifier>
</relatedItem>
</mods>