<mods xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3" version="3.3" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3 http://www.loc.gov/standards/mods/v3/mods-3-3.xsd" ID="P0b002ee180384e88">
<name type="corporate">
 <namePart>United States Government Publishing Office</namePart>
 <role>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">publisher</roleTerm>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="code">pbl</roleTerm>
</role>
 <role>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">distributor</roleTerm>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="code">dst</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="corporate">
 <namePart>United States</namePart>
 <namePart>Government Accountability Office</namePart>
 <namePart>Accounting and Information Management Division</namePart>
 <role>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">author</roleTerm>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="code">aut</roleTerm>
</role>
 <description>Government Organization</description>
</name>
<typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource>
<genre authority="marcgt">government publication</genre>
<language>
 <languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm>
</language>
<extension>
 <collectionCode>GAOREPORTS</collectionCode>
 <category>Legislative Agency Publications</category>
 <waisDatabaseName>gao</waisDatabaseName>
 <branch>legislative</branch>
 <dateIngested>2010-08-12</dateIngested>
</extension>
<originInfo>
 <publisher>U.S. Government Printing Office</publisher>
 <dateIssued encoding="w3cdtf">2000-03-10</dateIssued>
 <issuance>monographic</issuance>
</originInfo>
<physicalDescription>
 <note type="source content type">deposited</note>
 <digitalOrigin>born digital</digitalOrigin>
 <extent>16 p.</extent>
</physicalDescription>
<classification authority="sudocs">GA 1.13:T-AIMD-00-121</classification>
<identifier type="uri">https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/GAOREPORTS-T-AIMD-00-121</identifier>
<identifier type="local">P0b002ee180384e88</identifier>
<identifier type="former package identifier">f:ai00121t</identifier>
<recordInfo>
 <recordContentSource authority="marcorg">DGPO</recordContentSource>
 <recordCreationDate encoding="w3cdtf">2010-08-12</recordCreationDate>
 <recordChangeDate encoding="w3cdtf">2011-03-28</recordChangeDate>
 <recordIdentifier source="DGPO">GAOREPORTS-T-AIMD-00-121</recordIdentifier>
 <recordOrigin>machine generated</recordOrigin>
 <languageOfCataloging>
  <languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm>
</languageOfCataloging>
</recordInfo>
<accessCondition type="GPO scope determination">fdlp</accessCondition>
<extension>
 <docClass>REPORT</docClass>
 <accessId>GAOREPORTS-T-AIMD-00-121</accessId>
 <reportNumber>T-AIMD-00-121</reportNumber>
 <subject>Balanced budgets</subject>
 <subject>Congressional oversight</subject>
 <subject>Appropriations</subject>
 <subject>Proposed legislation</subject>
 <subject>Fiscal policies</subject>
 <subject>Future budget projections</subject>
 <subject>Presidential budgets</subject>
 <subject>Budget administration</subject>
 <identifier>Ohio</identifier>
 <identifier>Connecticut</identifier>
 <identifier>Arizona</identifier>
 <type>Testimony</type>
 <seriesAbbrev>AIMD</seriesAbbrev>
</extension>
<titleInfo>
 <title>Budget Process: Biennial Budgeting for the Federal</title>
</titleInfo>
<abstract>Proposals have been made to move the federal budget process from an
annual to a biennial cycle. The goal would be (1) to streamline the
congressional budget and reduce the time that Members of Congress must
spend casting seemingly repetitive votes, (2) to allow agency officials
to spend more time on financial management and analyses of program
effectiveness rather than on budget preparations and justifications, and
(3) to help agencies better manage their operations by providing funding
certainty over a two-year period. This testimony discusses state
experiences with biennial budgeting, the questions of periodicity and
availability of funds, and technical and implementation issues that must
be considered if the federal budget is switched to a biennial cycle.</abstract>
<location>
 <url displayLabel="HTML rendition" access="raw object">https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/GAOREPORTS-T-AIMD-00-121/html/GAOREPORTS-T-AIMD-00-121.htm</url>
 <url displayLabel="PDF rendition" access="raw object">https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/GAOREPORTS-T-AIMD-00-121/pdf/GAOREPORTS-T-AIMD-00-121.pdf</url>
</location>
<identifier type="preferred citation">GAO/T-AIMD-00-121</identifier>
<location>
 <url displayLabel="Content Detail" access="object in context">https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/GAOREPORTS-T-AIMD-00-121</url>
</location>
<note>Testimony</note>
<extension>
 <searchTitle>GAO/T-AIMD-00-121; Budget Process: Biennial Budgeting for the Federal;
            </searchTitle>
</extension>
<subject>
 <topic>Balanced budgets</topic>
 <topic>Congressional oversight</topic>
 <topic>Appropriations</topic>
 <topic>Proposed legislation</topic>
 <topic>Fiscal policies</topic>
 <topic>Future budget projections</topic>
 <topic>Presidential budgets</topic>
 <topic>Budget administration</topic>
 <topic>Ohio</topic>
 <topic>Connecticut</topic>
 <topic>Arizona</topic>
</subject>
</mods>