<mods xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3" version="3.3" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3 http://www.loc.gov/standards/mods/v3/mods-3-3.xsd" ID="P0b002ee180399a43">
<name type="corporate">
 <namePart>United States Government Publishing Office</namePart>
 <role>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">publisher</roleTerm>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="code">pbl</roleTerm>
</role>
 <role>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">distributor</roleTerm>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="code">dst</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="corporate">
 <namePart>United States</namePart>
 <namePart>Government Accountability Office</namePart>
 <namePart>Resources, Community, and Economic Development Division</namePart>
 <role>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">author</roleTerm>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="code">aut</roleTerm>
</role>
 <description>Government Organization</description>
</name>
<typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource>
<genre authority="marcgt">government publication</genre>
<language>
 <languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm>
</language>
<extension>
 <collectionCode>GAOREPORTS</collectionCode>
 <category>Legislative Agency Publications</category>
 <waisDatabaseName>gao</waisDatabaseName>
 <branch>legislative</branch>
 <dateIngested>2010-08-12</dateIngested>
</extension>
<originInfo>
 <publisher>U.S. Government Printing Office</publisher>
 <dateIssued encoding="w3cdtf">1999-05-03</dateIssued>
 <issuance>monographic</issuance>
</originInfo>
<physicalDescription>
 <note type="source content type">deposited</note>
 <digitalOrigin>born digital</digitalOrigin>
 <extent>68 p.</extent>
</physicalDescription>
<classification authority="sudocs">GA 1.13:RCED-99-75</classification>
<identifier type="uri">https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/GAOREPORTS-RCED-99-75</identifier>
<identifier type="local">P0b002ee180399a43</identifier>
<identifier type="former package identifier">f:rc99075</identifier>
<recordInfo>
 <recordContentSource authority="marcorg">DGPO</recordContentSource>
 <recordCreationDate encoding="w3cdtf">2010-08-12</recordCreationDate>
 <recordChangeDate encoding="w3cdtf">2011-03-23</recordChangeDate>
 <recordIdentifier source="DGPO">GAOREPORTS-RCED-99-75</recordIdentifier>
 <recordOrigin>machine generated</recordOrigin>
 <languageOfCataloging>
  <languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm>
</languageOfCataloging>
</recordInfo>
<accessCondition type="GPO scope determination">fdlp</accessCondition>
<extension>
 <docClass>REPORT</docClass>
 <accessId>GAOREPORTS-RCED-99-75</accessId>
 <reportNumber>RCED-99-75</reportNumber>
 <subject>Licenses</subject>
 <subject>Reporting requirements</subject>
 <subject>Future budget projections</subject>
 <subject>Electric utilities</subject>
 <subject>Regulatory agencies</subject>
 <subject>Nuclear powerplants</subject>
 <subject>Nuclear reactors</subject>
 <subject>Nuclear waste disposal</subject>
 <subject>Obsolete facilities</subject>
 <subject>Utility rates</subject>
 <type>Chapter Report</type>
 <seriesAbbrev>RCED</seriesAbbrev>
</extension>
<titleInfo>
 <title>Nuclear Regulation: Better Oversight Needed to Ensure</title>
</titleInfo>
<abstract>Pursuant to a congressional request, GAO provided information on the
potential cost to decommission nuclear power plants and the implications
of competition within the electricity industry, focusing on whether: (1)
there is adequate assurance that the Nuclear Regulatory Commission&apos;s
(NRC) licensees are accumulating sufficient funds for decommissioning;
and (2) NRC is adequately addressing the effects of electricity
deregulation on the funds that will eventually be needed for
decommissioning.&lt;p/&gt;GAO noted that: (1) although the estimated cost to decommission a
nuclear power plant is on the order of $300 million to $400 million in
today&apos;s dollars, NRC does not know if licensees are accumulating
sufficient funds for this future expense; (2) GAO&apos;s analysis showed
that, under likely assumptions, 36 of 76 licensees had not accumulated
sufficient decommissioning funds through 1997; (3) however, all but 15
of these 36 licensees appeared to be making up their funding shortfalls
with recent increases in the rates that they are accumulating
decommissioning funds; (4) using more pessimistic and optimistic
assumptions would increase or decrease the number of underfunded
licensees, respectively; (5) although utility commissions have permitted
licensees to continue charging their customers for the costs of
decommissioning prematurely-retired plants, this financial safeguard
could be affected by states&apos; efforts to deregulate the electricity
industry; (6) to address the movement toward deregulating the
electricity industry, in November 1998 NRC began requiring its licensees
to provide additional financial assurances if the Federal Energy
Regulatory Commission or state utility commissions will no longer
guarantee, through the regulation of electricity rates, the collection
of sufficient funds for decommissioning; (7) however, one additional
form of financial assurance--the early payment of decommissioning
costs--may not be practicable or affordable; (8) also, NRC considered
requiring licensees to accelerate decommissioning funding as a hedge
against the premature retirement of plants but rejected the concept
because of possible adverse effects on licensees&apos; finances; (9) on the
other hand, NRC&apos;s alternative methods to the collection of
decommissioning funds earlier essentially rely on the continued
financial health of the licensee or its parent company; (10) thus, the
effectiveness of NRC&apos;s 1998 regulatory changes will likely depend on how
vigorously NRC monitors the financial health of its licensees; (11) in
this regard, licensees must now provide financial reports every 2 years
to NRC so it can monitor financial assurances for decommissioning; and
(12) however, NRC did not establish thresholds for clearly identifying
acceptable levels of financial assurances or establish criteria for
identifying and responding to unacceptable levels of assurances.</abstract>
<location>
 <url displayLabel="HTML rendition" access="raw object">https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/GAOREPORTS-RCED-99-75/html/GAOREPORTS-RCED-99-75.htm</url>
 <url displayLabel="PDF rendition" access="raw object">https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/GAOREPORTS-RCED-99-75/pdf/GAOREPORTS-RCED-99-75.pdf</url>
</location>
<identifier type="preferred citation">GAO/RCED-99-75</identifier>
<location>
 <url displayLabel="Content Detail" access="object in context">https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/GAOREPORTS-RCED-99-75</url>
</location>
<note>Chapter Report</note>
<extension>
 <searchTitle>GAO/RCED-99-75; Nuclear Regulation: Better Oversight Needed to Ensure;
            </searchTitle>
</extension>
<subject>
 <topic>Licenses</topic>
 <topic>Reporting requirements</topic>
 <topic>Future budget projections</topic>
 <topic>Electric utilities</topic>
 <topic>Regulatory agencies</topic>
 <topic>Nuclear powerplants</topic>
 <topic>Nuclear reactors</topic>
 <topic>Nuclear waste disposal</topic>
 <topic>Obsolete facilities</topic>
 <topic>Utility rates</topic>
</subject>
</mods>