<mods xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3" version="3.3" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3 http://www.loc.gov/standards/mods/v3/mods-3-3.xsd" ID="P0b002ee18038b6bf">
<name type="corporate">
 <namePart>United States Government Publishing Office</namePart>
 <role>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">publisher</roleTerm>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="code">pbl</roleTerm>
</role>
 <role>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">distributor</roleTerm>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="code">dst</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="corporate">
 <namePart>United States</namePart>
 <namePart>Government Accountability Office</namePart>
 <namePart>Resources, Community, and Economic Development Division</namePart>
 <role>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">author</roleTerm>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="code">aut</roleTerm>
</role>
 <description>Government Organization</description>
</name>
<typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource>
<genre authority="marcgt">government publication</genre>
<language>
 <languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm>
</language>
<extension>
 <collectionCode>GAOREPORTS</collectionCode>
 <category>Legislative Agency Publications</category>
 <waisDatabaseName>gao</waisDatabaseName>
 <branch>legislative</branch>
 <dateIngested>2010-08-12</dateIngested>
</extension>
<originInfo>
 <publisher>U.S. Government Printing Office</publisher>
 <dateIssued encoding="w3cdtf">1998-10-26</dateIssued>
 <issuance>monographic</issuance>
</originInfo>
<physicalDescription>
 <note type="source content type">deposited</note>
 <digitalOrigin>born digital</digitalOrigin>
 <extent>58 p.</extent>
</physicalDescription>
<classification authority="sudocs">GA 1.13:RCED-99-6</classification>
<identifier type="uri">https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/GAOREPORTS-RCED-99-6</identifier>
<identifier type="local">P0b002ee18038b6bf</identifier>
<identifier type="former package identifier">f:rc99006</identifier>
<recordInfo>
 <recordContentSource authority="marcorg">DGPO</recordContentSource>
 <recordCreationDate encoding="w3cdtf">2010-08-12</recordCreationDate>
 <recordChangeDate encoding="w3cdtf">2011-03-23</recordChangeDate>
 <recordIdentifier source="DGPO">GAOREPORTS-RCED-99-6</recordIdentifier>
 <recordOrigin>machine generated</recordOrigin>
 <languageOfCataloging>
  <languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm>
</languageOfCataloging>
</recordInfo>
<accessCondition type="GPO scope determination">fdlp</accessCondition>
<extension>
 <docClass>REPORT</docClass>
 <accessId>GAOREPORTS-RCED-99-6</accessId>
 <reportNumber>RCED-99-6</reportNumber>
 <subject>Equipment repairs</subject>
 <subject>Aircraft</subject>
 <subject>Helicopters</subject>
 <subject>Ships</subject>
 <subject>Cost control</subject>
 <subject>Cost analysis</subject>
 <subject>User fees</subject>
 <subject>Future budget projections</subject>
 <subject>Federal procurement</subject>
 <identifier>Coast Guard Deepwater Capability Replacement Project</identifier>
 <type>Chapter Report</type>
 <seriesAbbrev>RCED</seriesAbbrev>
 <accountNo>Y1997</accountNo>
</extension>
<titleInfo>
 <title>Coast Guard&apos;s Acquisition Management: Deepwater Project&apos;s Justification and Affordability Need to Be Addressed More Thoroughly</title>
</titleInfo>
<abstract>Pursuant to a congressional request, GAO reviewed the extent to which
the Coast Guard has: (1) accurately depicted the need to replace or
modernize its deepwater ships and aircraft; and (2) aligned the
estimated cost of its Deepwater Project with its overall budget for
capital projects.&lt;p/&gt;GAO noted that: (1) although the Coast Guard is correct in starting now
to explore how best to modernize or replace its deepwater ships and
aircraft, the Deepwater Project&apos;s only formal justification developed to
date does not accurately or fully depict the need for replacement or
modernization; (2) this justification concluded that most deepwater
ships and aircraft would need to be phased out starting in the next 2 to
9 years; (3) however, subsequent analyses by the Coast Guard and others
have shown that deepwater aircraft likely have a much longer life; (4)
the justification asserted that these ships and aircraft were incapable
of performing future missions or meeting future demand, but GAO was
unable to validate these assertions from the information available; (5)
the Coast Guard withdrew the justification on the basis of concerns
expressed by the Office of Management and Budget and is now developing
more accurate and updated information; (6) several of these studies are
still under way, even as contracting teams have already begun work on
developing their initial deepwater proposals; (7) any delays in
communicating this updated information to the contractors could
adversely affect the quality of the proposals submitted; (8) while the
Coast Guard&apos;s acquisition approach seems an appropriate way to avoid a
costly one-for-one replacement of ships and aircraft, the agency could
face major financial obstacles in proceeding with a Deepwater Project
costing as much as initially proposed for planning purposes; (9) at a
projected $500 million a year, expenditures for the project would take
virtually all of the Coast Guard&apos;s projected spending for all capital
projects, which currently include the construction of new buoy tenders
and motorized lifeboats; (10) the Coast Guard expects more than $165
million of the annual funding to come from new user fees for domestic
ice-breaking and navigational services that the Coast Guard currently
provides; (11) however, the congressional subcommittees with
jurisdiction over the Coast Guard&apos;s budget have expressed opposition to
such fees, and the House and Senate have prohibited the Coast Guard from
planning or implementing any new user fees; (12) if hoped-for funding
does not occur, the Coast Guard may be left having either to reduce the
scope of the project or to stretch out the procurement period; and (13)
many other government procurement projects have demonstrated that when
agencies attempt to address a problem by stretching out the procurement
period, administrative and other costs increase, resulting in lower
value for the amount of money spent.</abstract>
<location>
 <url displayLabel="HTML rendition" access="raw object">https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/GAOREPORTS-RCED-99-6/html/GAOREPORTS-RCED-99-6.htm</url>
 <url displayLabel="PDF rendition" access="raw object">https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/GAOREPORTS-RCED-99-6/pdf/GAOREPORTS-RCED-99-6.pdf</url>
</location>
<identifier type="preferred citation">GAO/RCED-99-6</identifier>
<location>
 <url displayLabel="Content Detail" access="object in context">https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/GAOREPORTS-RCED-99-6</url>
</location>
<note>Chapter Report</note>
<extension>
 <searchTitle>GAO/RCED-99-6; Coast Guard&apos;s Acquisition Management: Deepwater Project&apos;s Justification and Affordability Need to Be Addressed More Thoroughly;
            </searchTitle>
</extension>
<subject>
 <topic>Equipment repairs</topic>
 <topic>Aircraft</topic>
 <topic>Helicopters</topic>
 <topic>Ships</topic>
 <topic>Cost control</topic>
 <topic>Cost analysis</topic>
 <topic>User fees</topic>
 <topic>Future budget projections</topic>
 <topic>Federal procurement</topic>
 <topic>Coast Guard Deepwater Capability Replacement Project</topic>
</subject>
</mods>