<mods xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3" version="3.3" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3 http://www.loc.gov/standards/mods/v3/mods-3-3.xsd" ID="P0b002ee180374b99">
<name type="corporate">
 <namePart>United States Government Publishing Office</namePart>
 <role>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">publisher</roleTerm>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="code">pbl</roleTerm>
</role>
 <role>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">distributor</roleTerm>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="code">dst</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="corporate">
 <namePart>United States</namePart>
 <namePart>Government Accountability Office</namePart>
 <namePart>Resources, Community, and Economic Development Division</namePart>
 <role>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">author</roleTerm>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="code">aut</roleTerm>
</role>
 <description>Government Organization</description>
</name>
<typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource>
<genre authority="marcgt">government publication</genre>
<language>
 <languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm>
</language>
<extension>
 <collectionCode>GAOREPORTS</collectionCode>
 <category>Legislative Agency Publications</category>
 <waisDatabaseName>gao</waisDatabaseName>
 <branch>legislative</branch>
 <dateIngested>2010-08-12</dateIngested>
</extension>
<originInfo>
 <publisher>U.S. Government Printing Office</publisher>
 <dateIssued encoding="w3cdtf">1999-09-27</dateIssued>
 <issuance>monographic</issuance>
</originInfo>
<physicalDescription>
 <note type="source content type">deposited</note>
 <digitalOrigin>born digital</digitalOrigin>
 <extent>24 p.</extent>
</physicalDescription>
<classification authority="sudocs">GA 1.13:RCED-99-264</classification>
<identifier type="uri">https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/GAOREPORTS-RCED-99-264</identifier>
<identifier type="local">P0b002ee180374b99</identifier>
<identifier type="former package identifier">f:rc99264</identifier>
<recordInfo>
 <recordContentSource authority="marcorg">DGPO</recordContentSource>
 <recordCreationDate encoding="w3cdtf">2010-08-12</recordCreationDate>
 <recordChangeDate encoding="w3cdtf">2011-03-28</recordChangeDate>
 <recordIdentifier source="DGPO">GAOREPORTS-RCED-99-264</recordIdentifier>
 <recordOrigin>machine generated</recordOrigin>
 <languageOfCataloging>
  <languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm>
</languageOfCataloging>
</recordInfo>
<accessCondition type="GPO scope determination">fdlp</accessCondition>
<extension>
 <docClass>REPORT</docClass>
 <accessId>GAOREPORTS-RCED-99-264</accessId>
 <reportNumber>RCED-99-264</reportNumber>
 <subject>Highway research</subject>
 <subject>Federal aid for highways</subject>
 <subject>Highway planning</subject>
 <subject>Data integrity</subject>
 <subject>Public roads or highways</subject>
 <subject>Statistical data</subject>
 <subject>Federal/state relations</subject>
 <subject>Evaluation methods</subject>
 <subject>Comparative analysis</subject>
 <subject>Performance measures</subject>
 <identifier>FHwA Highway Performance Monitoring System</identifier>
 <identifier>National Highway System</identifier>
 <identifier>DOT Highway Economic Requirements System</identifier>
 <identifier>International Roughness Index</identifier>
 <type>Letter Report</type>
 <seriesAbbrev>RCED</seriesAbbrev>
 <law congress="105" isPrivate="false" number="178"></law>
</extension>
<titleInfo>
 <title>Transportation Infrastructure: Better Data Needed to Rate</title>
</titleInfo>
<abstract>Pursuant to a legislative requirement, GAO provided information on
federal and state efforts to assess the conditions of the nation&apos;s
highways, focusing on: (1) the uses the Federal Highway Administration
(FHwA), the states, and others make of the International Roughness index
to assess highway conditions; (2) the consistency and accuracy of
state-reported data on highway roughness; and (3) FHwA&apos;s efforts to
improve the data across states.&lt;p/&gt;GAO noted that: (1) the International Roughness Index is used widely for
federal and state purposes, as well as for independent analyses; (2) at
the national level, where the index is the only available statistic on
pavement conditions, FHwA uses it to assess changes in the overall
condition of the nation&apos;s highways and to forecast future highway
investment needs; (3) actual expenditures for highways by all levels of
government in 1995 were about $29.2 billion, or about $41 billion less
than FHwA had projected as needed to repair the deficiencies; (4) in
addition, FHwA uses the index to measure progress toward a goal for ride
quality in its strategic plan and publishes data from the index for use
by the public; (5) at the state level, where other types of data on
pavement conditions are available, reliance on the index varies; (6)
while some states rely on it to make highway maintenance decisions,
others do not consider it an important decision-making tool; (7) the
states that rely on the index use it to project highway investment needs
and report on pavement performance at the state or district levels; (8)
in addition, some states use the index to set standards for construction
projects; (9) independent analysts have used the data to compare
pavement conditions across states and to develop scorecards of state
performance; (10) critics contend that state comparisons based on the
index are flawed because the pavement roughness data reported to FHwA by
the states are not consistent or accurate; (11) these problems with
consistency and accuracy have occurred for two reasons: (a) the states
use different methods to gather data and compute results; the states
differ in the devices they use to measure the pavement, the part of the
road they measure, and their choice of an appropriate mathematical
simulation; and (b) the type of surface asphalt or concrete influences
the results; concrete roads may produce rougher readings than asphalt
roads, even if the concrete road is of very high quality; (12) features
such as joints between sections can contribute to the roughness of
concrete highways; (13) while FHwA has tried to improve the data, these
efforts have not been completely successful; and (14) the agency
developed detailed guidelines for collecting the data and asked the
states to apply these guidelines before reporting the data.</abstract>
<location>
 <url displayLabel="HTML rendition" access="raw object">https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/GAOREPORTS-RCED-99-264/html/GAOREPORTS-RCED-99-264.htm</url>
 <url displayLabel="PDF rendition" access="raw object">https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/GAOREPORTS-RCED-99-264/pdf/GAOREPORTS-RCED-99-264.pdf</url>
</location>
<identifier type="preferred citation">GAO/RCED-99-264</identifier>
<location>
 <url displayLabel="Content Detail" access="object in context">https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/GAOREPORTS-RCED-99-264</url>
</location>
<note>Letter Report</note>
<extension>
 <searchTitle>GAO/RCED-99-264; Transportation Infrastructure: Better Data Needed to Rate;
            </searchTitle>
</extension>
<subject>
 <topic>Highway research</topic>
 <topic>Federal aid for highways</topic>
 <topic>Highway planning</topic>
 <topic>Data integrity</topic>
 <topic>Public roads or highways</topic>
 <topic>Statistical data</topic>
 <topic>Federal/state relations</topic>
 <topic>Evaluation methods</topic>
 <topic>Comparative analysis</topic>
 <topic>Performance measures</topic>
 <topic>FHwA Highway Performance Monitoring System</topic>
 <topic>National Highway System</topic>
 <topic>DOT Highway Economic Requirements System</topic>
 <topic>International Roughness Index</topic>
</subject>
<relatedItem type="isReferencedBy">
 <titleInfo>
  <title>United States Public Law 178 (105th Congress)</title>
</titleInfo>
 <identifier type="public law citation">Public Law 105-178</identifier>
</relatedItem>
</mods>