<mods xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3" version="3.3" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3 http://www.loc.gov/standards/mods/v3/mods-3-3.xsd" ID="P0b002ee180391cd9">
<name type="corporate">
 <namePart>United States Government Publishing Office</namePart>
 <role>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">publisher</roleTerm>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="code">pbl</roleTerm>
</role>
 <role>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">distributor</roleTerm>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="code">dst</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="corporate">
 <namePart>United States</namePart>
 <namePart>Government Accountability Office</namePart>
 <namePart>Resources, Community, and Economic Development Division</namePart>
 <role>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">author</roleTerm>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="code">aut</roleTerm>
</role>
 <description>Government Organization</description>
</name>
<typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource>
<genre authority="marcgt">government publication</genre>
<language>
 <languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm>
</language>
<extension>
 <collectionCode>GAOREPORTS</collectionCode>
 <category>Legislative Agency Publications</category>
 <waisDatabaseName>gao</waisDatabaseName>
 <branch>legislative</branch>
 <dateIngested>2010-08-12</dateIngested>
</extension>
<originInfo>
 <publisher>U.S. Government Printing Office</publisher>
 <dateIssued encoding="w3cdtf">1999-08-23</dateIssued>
 <issuance>monographic</issuance>
</originInfo>
<physicalDescription>
 <note type="source content type">deposited</note>
 <digitalOrigin>born digital</digitalOrigin>
 <extent>32 p.</extent>
</physicalDescription>
<classification authority="sudocs">GA 1.13:RCED-99-248</classification>
<identifier type="uri">https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/GAOREPORTS-RCED-99-248</identifier>
<identifier type="local">P0b002ee180391cd9</identifier>
<identifier type="former package identifier">f:rc99248</identifier>
<recordInfo>
 <recordContentSource authority="marcorg">DGPO</recordContentSource>
 <recordCreationDate encoding="w3cdtf">2010-08-12</recordCreationDate>
 <recordChangeDate encoding="w3cdtf">2011-03-28</recordChangeDate>
 <recordIdentifier source="DGPO">GAOREPORTS-RCED-99-248</recordIdentifier>
 <recordOrigin>machine generated</recordOrigin>
 <languageOfCataloging>
  <languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm>
</languageOfCataloging>
</recordInfo>
<accessCondition type="GPO scope determination">fdlp</accessCondition>
<extension>
 <docClass>REPORT</docClass>
 <accessId>GAOREPORTS-RCED-99-248</accessId>
 <reportNumber>RCED-99-248</reportNumber>
 <subject>Reporting requirements</subject>
 <subject>Environmental monitoring</subject>
 <subject>International cooperation</subject>
 <subject>Hazardous substances</subject>
 <subject>Air pollution control</subject>
 <subject>Data integrity</subject>
 <subject>Environmental policies</subject>
 <subject>International agreements</subject>
 <subject>Sanctions</subject>
 <identifier>United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change</identifier>
 <identifier>Kyoto Protocol</identifier>
 <identifier>Montreal Protocol on Substances That Deplete the Ozone</identifier>
 <identifier>Layer</identifier>
 <type>Letter Report</type>
 <seriesAbbrev>RCED</seriesAbbrev>
</extension>
<titleInfo>
 <title>International Environment: Experts&apos; Observations on</title>
</titleInfo>
<abstract>Pursuant to a congressional request, GAO identified issues that could
enhance compliance with the Kyoto Protocol or any climate change
agreement, focusing on the: (1) clarity of the protocol&apos;s goals and
procedures; (2) use of incentives that encourage compliance to
supplement punitive measures to punish noncompliance; and (3) role of
environmental and industry groups.&lt;p/&gt;GAO noted that: (1) three features could enhance compliance with the
provisions being negotiated for the Kyoto Protocol on reporting
greenhouse gas emissions, monitoring emissions and verifying compliance
with emissions limits, and enforcing the protocol&apos;s requirements; (2)
while the protocol specifies country-by-country emissions limits, it is
not clear how these limits fit into the long-term objective of
stabilizing the concentration of greenhouse gases in the atmosphere; (3)
clear reporting requirements will help ensure that the data collected on
emissions are accurate and comparable; (4) clearly defined processes for
monitoring nations&apos; progress toward their goals and for taking action
against those that do not comply will help ensure that the monitoring
and enforcement processes are perceived as equitable and, ultimately,
make them more effective; (5) international environmental agreements
have tended to use enforcement provisions infrequently or ineffectively;
(6) recent experience with agreements such as the Montreal Protocol on
Substances That Deplete the Ozone Layer suggests that supplementing
enforcement penalties with incentives can help ensure that nations
comply with an agreement&apos;s requirements; (7) the panelists discussed
three types of incentives that could be incorporated into the Kyoto
Protocol&apos;s provisions: (a) the protocol&apos;s requirements must be binding,
but different reporting requirements may be appropriate for different
nations; (b) because the signatory nations vary widely in terms of the
resources they have available to implement the protocol&apos;s requirements,
some nations may need technical or financial help to design and
implement reporting systems; and (c) because the ability to buy and sell
emissions allowances is an incentive for nations to participate, the
protocol needs to specify how the risks involved with an international
emissions trading system will be allocated; (8) traditionally, official
recognition (standing) for the purpose of monitoring compliance with
international agreements has been provided only to the authorized
delegates of the nations that are parties to the agreement; (9)
environmental and industry groups traditionally lack standing under
these agreements; and (10) such entities may have data on certain
greenhouse gas emissions that could be used to help verify the data that
nations report, and they may have resources that could assist in the
monitoring of compliance.</abstract>
<location>
 <url displayLabel="HTML rendition" access="raw object">https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/GAOREPORTS-RCED-99-248/html/GAOREPORTS-RCED-99-248.htm</url>
 <url displayLabel="PDF rendition" access="raw object">https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/GAOREPORTS-RCED-99-248/pdf/GAOREPORTS-RCED-99-248.pdf</url>
</location>
<identifier type="preferred citation">GAO/RCED-99-248</identifier>
<location>
 <url displayLabel="Content Detail" access="object in context">https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/GAOREPORTS-RCED-99-248</url>
</location>
<note>Letter Report</note>
<extension>
 <searchTitle>GAO/RCED-99-248; International Environment: Experts&apos; Observations on;
            </searchTitle>
</extension>
<subject>
 <topic>Reporting requirements</topic>
 <topic>Environmental monitoring</topic>
 <topic>International cooperation</topic>
 <topic>Hazardous substances</topic>
 <topic>Air pollution control</topic>
 <topic>Data integrity</topic>
 <topic>Environmental policies</topic>
 <topic>International agreements</topic>
 <topic>Sanctions</topic>
 <topic>United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change</topic>
 <topic>Kyoto Protocol</topic>
 <topic>Montreal Protocol on Substances That Deplete the Ozone</topic>
 <topic>Layer</topic>
</subject>
</mods>