<mods xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3" version="3.3" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3 http://www.loc.gov/standards/mods/v3/mods-3-3.xsd" ID="P0b002ee18039e2a6">
<name type="corporate">
 <namePart>United States Government Publishing Office</namePart>
 <role>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">publisher</roleTerm>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="code">pbl</roleTerm>
</role>
 <role>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">distributor</roleTerm>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="code">dst</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="corporate">
 <namePart>United States</namePart>
 <namePart>Government Accountability Office</namePart>
 <namePart>Resources, Community, and Economic Development Division</namePart>
 <role>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">author</roleTerm>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="code">aut</roleTerm>
</role>
 <description>Government Organization</description>
</name>
<typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource>
<genre authority="marcgt">government publication</genre>
<language>
 <languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm>
</language>
<extension>
 <collectionCode>GAOREPORTS</collectionCode>
 <category>Legislative Agency Publications</category>
 <waisDatabaseName>gao</waisDatabaseName>
 <branch>legislative</branch>
 <dateIngested>2010-08-12</dateIngested>
</extension>
<originInfo>
 <publisher>U.S. Government Printing Office</publisher>
 <dateIssued encoding="w3cdtf">1999-06-30</dateIssued>
 <issuance>monographic</issuance>
</originInfo>
<physicalDescription>
 <note type="source content type">deposited</note>
 <digitalOrigin>born digital</digitalOrigin>
 <extent>103 p.</extent>
</physicalDescription>
<classification authority="sudocs">GA 1.13:RCED-99-150</classification>
<identifier type="uri">https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/GAOREPORTS-RCED-99-150</identifier>
<identifier type="local">P0b002ee18039e2a6</identifier>
<identifier type="former package identifier">f:rc99150</identifier>
<recordInfo>
 <recordContentSource authority="marcorg">DGPO</recordContentSource>
 <recordCreationDate encoding="w3cdtf">2010-08-12</recordCreationDate>
 <recordChangeDate encoding="w3cdtf">2011-03-28</recordChangeDate>
 <recordIdentifier source="DGPO">GAOREPORTS-RCED-99-150</recordIdentifier>
 <recordOrigin>machine generated</recordOrigin>
 <languageOfCataloging>
  <languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm>
</languageOfCataloging>
</recordInfo>
<accessCondition type="GPO scope determination">fdlp</accessCondition>
<extension>
 <docClass>REPORT</docClass>
 <accessId>GAOREPORTS-RCED-99-150</accessId>
 <reportNumber>RCED-99-150</reportNumber>
 <subject>Native Americans</subject>
 <subject>Contract administration</subject>
 <subject>Administrative costs</subject>
 <subject>Funds management</subject>
 <subject>Appropriated funds</subject>
 <subject>Indian affairs legislation</subject>
 <identifier>IHS Indian Self-Determination Fund</identifier>
 <type>Letter Report</type>
 <seriesAbbrev>RCED</seriesAbbrev>
 <law congress="93" isPrivate="false" number="638"></law>
 <law congress="100" isPrivate="false" number="297"></law>
 <law congress="105" isPrivate="false" number="277"></law>
 <USCode title="25">
                      <section detail="note" number="450f"></section>
                      <section number="450j-1"></section>
                      <section number="458cc"></section>
                </USCode>
 <statuteAtLarge volume="112">
                      <pages pages="2681-288"></pages>
                </statuteAtLarge>
 <congReport congress="105" number="227" type="S"></congReport>
</extension>
<titleInfo>
 <title>Indian Self-Determination Act: Shortfalls in Indian</title>
</titleInfo>
<abstract>Pursuant to a legislative requirement, GAO provided information on the
Bureau of Indian Affairs&apos; (BIA) and the Indian Health Service&apos;s (IHS)
management of contract support funding under the Indian
Self-Determination and Education Assistance Act, focusing on: (1) to
what extent and for what reasons contract support costs and the
associated funding shortfalls changed over the past decade, and what can
be expected in the future for these costs; (2) how the shortfalls in
funding for contract support costs affected tribes; and (3) whether the
act&apos;s provisions for contract support costs have been consistently
implemented.&lt;p/&gt;GAO noted that: (1) tribes&apos; allowable contract support costs have
tripled from 1989 through 1998--increasing from about $125 million to
about $375 million; (2) the total amount of program dollars contracted
by tribes--upon which contract support costs are based--has increased;
(3) the total cost of tribes&apos; administration of contracts has increased;
(4) although the amounts appropriated for contract support costs have
increased, Congress has not funded contract support to keep pace with
these increases, resulting in funding shortfalls; (5) in fiscal year
(FY) 1998, almost $280 million of the about $375 million that was
allowable for contract support costs was appropriated, resulting in a
shortfall of about $95 million; (6) projections of future contract
support costs are difficult to calculate because the number of programs
tribes will elect to contract and the amount of funding they will
receive are uncertain; (7) for the forseeable future, tribes&apos; allowable
contract support costs are unlikely to dip below the FY 1998 level of
$375 million and will likely increase, as they have done in the past;
(8) according to the 94 tribes that GAO communicated with during its
review, shortfalls in funding for contract support costs have caused
financial difficulties and frustration for the tribes administering the
programs; (9) they have had to take a number of steps to cope with
shortfalls in contract support funding; (10) reducing their contract
support costs to within the amount of funding provided has been one such
step; (11) however, the tribes noted that this has decreased the
efficiency and productivity of their tribal administrative functions;
(12) to make up for the shortfall, the tribes reported using program
funds, which reduced services to tribal members, or using tribal
resources, which precluded the use of those resources to supplement
program funds or to develop tribal business ventures; (13) the contract
support policies and practices of the Bureau, the Health Service, and
the Department of the Interior&apos;s Office of Inspector General have been
inconsistent, which may result in some tribes receiving more contract
support funding than they are allowed and in others receiving less; (14)
GAO also found some inconsistencies in the calculation and the
application of indirect cost rates that were used to determine tribes&apos;
allowable contract support costs; and (15) the impasse between providing
full funding for contract support costs and limiting these costs
continues in Congress.</abstract>
<location>
 <url displayLabel="HTML rendition" access="raw object">https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/GAOREPORTS-RCED-99-150/html/GAOREPORTS-RCED-99-150.htm</url>
 <url displayLabel="PDF rendition" access="raw object">https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/GAOREPORTS-RCED-99-150/pdf/GAOREPORTS-RCED-99-150.pdf</url>
</location>
<identifier type="preferred citation">GAO/RCED-99-150</identifier>
<location>
 <url displayLabel="Content Detail" access="object in context">https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/GAOREPORTS-RCED-99-150</url>
</location>
<note>Letter Report</note>
<extension>
 <searchTitle>GAO/RCED-99-150; Indian Self-Determination Act: Shortfalls in Indian;
            </searchTitle>
</extension>
<subject>
 <topic>Native Americans</topic>
 <topic>Contract administration</topic>
 <topic>Administrative costs</topic>
 <topic>Funds management</topic>
 <topic>Appropriated funds</topic>
 <topic>Indian affairs legislation</topic>
 <topic>IHS Indian Self-Determination Fund</topic>
</subject>
<relatedItem type="isReferencedBy">
 <titleInfo>
  <title>United States Code</title>
  <partNumber>Title 25 Section 450fnote</partNumber>
  <partNumber>Title 25 Section 450j-1</partNumber>
  <partNumber>Title 25 Section 458cc</partNumber>
</titleInfo>
 <identifier type="USC citation">25 U.S.C. 450fnote</identifier>
 <identifier type="USC citation">25 U.S.C. 450j-1</identifier>
 <identifier type="USC citation">25 U.S.C. 458cc</identifier>
</relatedItem>
<relatedItem type="isReferencedBy">
 <titleInfo>
  <title>United States Statutes at Large</title>
  <partNumber>Volume 112 Page 2681-288</partNumber>
</titleInfo>
 <identifier type="Statute citation">112 Stat. 2681-288</identifier>
</relatedItem>
<relatedItem type="isReferencedBy">
 <titleInfo>
  <title>United States Public Law 638 (93rd Congress)</title>
</titleInfo>
 <identifier type="public law citation">Public Law 93-638</identifier>
</relatedItem>
<relatedItem type="isReferencedBy">
 <titleInfo>
  <title>United States Public Law 297 (100th Congress)</title>
</titleInfo>
 <identifier type="public law citation">Public Law 100-297</identifier>
</relatedItem>
<relatedItem type="isReferencedBy">
 <titleInfo>
  <title>United States Public Law 277 (105th Congress)</title>
</titleInfo>
 <identifier type="public law citation">Public Law 105-277</identifier>
</relatedItem>
<relatedItem type="isReferencedBy">
 <titleInfo>
  <title>United States Senate Report 227 (105th Congress)</title>
</titleInfo>
 <identifier type="congressional report citation">S. Rept. 105-227</identifier>
</relatedItem>
</mods>