<mods xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3" version="3.3" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3 http://www.loc.gov/standards/mods/v3/mods-3-3.xsd" ID="P0b002ee18038ee76">
<name type="corporate">
 <namePart>United States Government Publishing Office</namePart>
 <role>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">publisher</roleTerm>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="code">pbl</roleTerm>
</role>
 <role>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">distributor</roleTerm>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="code">dst</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="corporate">
 <namePart>United States</namePart>
 <namePart>Government Accountability Office</namePart>
 <namePart>Resources, Community, and Economic Development Division</namePart>
 <role>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">author</roleTerm>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="code">aut</roleTerm>
</role>
 <description>Government Organization</description>
</name>
<typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource>
<genre authority="marcgt">government publication</genre>
<language>
 <languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm>
</language>
<extension>
 <collectionCode>GAOREPORTS</collectionCode>
 <category>Legislative Agency Publications</category>
 <waisDatabaseName>gao</waisDatabaseName>
 <branch>legislative</branch>
 <dateIngested>2010-08-12</dateIngested>
</extension>
<originInfo>
 <publisher>U.S. Government Printing Office</publisher>
 <dateIssued encoding="w3cdtf">1998-11-09</dateIssued>
 <issuance>monographic</issuance>
</originInfo>
<physicalDescription>
 <note type="source content type">deposited</note>
 <digitalOrigin>born digital</digitalOrigin>
 <extent>33 p.</extent>
</physicalDescription>
<classification authority="sudocs">GA 1.13:RCED-99-1</classification>
<identifier type="uri">https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/GAOREPORTS-RCED-99-1</identifier>
<identifier type="local">P0b002ee18038ee76</identifier>
<identifier type="former package identifier">f:rc99001</identifier>
<recordInfo>
 <recordContentSource authority="marcorg">DGPO</recordContentSource>
 <recordCreationDate encoding="w3cdtf">2010-08-12</recordCreationDate>
 <recordChangeDate encoding="w3cdtf">2011-03-24</recordChangeDate>
 <recordIdentifier source="DGPO">GAOREPORTS-RCED-99-1</recordIdentifier>
 <recordOrigin>machine generated</recordOrigin>
 <languageOfCataloging>
  <languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm>
</languageOfCataloging>
</recordInfo>
<accessCondition type="GPO scope determination">fdlp</accessCondition>
<extension>
 <docClass>REPORT</docClass>
 <accessId>GAOREPORTS-RCED-99-1</accessId>
 <reportNumber>RCED-99-1</reportNumber>
 <subject>Nuclear weapons</subject>
 <subject>Nuclear weapons testing</subject>
 <subject>Interagency relations</subject>
 <subject>Cost effectiveness analysis</subject>
 <subject>Defense capabilities</subject>
 <subject>Cost control</subject>
 <subject>Defense contingency planning</subject>
 <subject>Weapons systems</subject>
 <subject>Atomic energy defense activities</subject>
 <subject>Nuclear weapons plants</subject>
 <type>Letter Report</type>
 <seriesAbbrev>RCED</seriesAbbrev>
</extension>
<titleInfo>
 <title>Nuclear Weapons: Key Nuclear Weapons Component Issues Are Unresolved</title>
</titleInfo>
<abstract>Pursuant to a congressional request, GAO provided information on the
Department of Energy&apos;s (DOE) efforts to manufacture war reserve nuclear
weapon triggers, or pits, at its Los Alamos National Laboratory,
focusing on: (1) DOE&apos;s plans and schedules for reestablishing the
manufacturing of pits at Los Alamos; (2) the costs associated with these
efforts; and (3) unresolved issues regarding the manufacturing of pits
between the Department of Defense (DOD) and DOE.&lt;p/&gt;GAO noted that: (1) DOE&apos;s plans for reestablishing the production of
pits at Los Alamos National Laboratory have changed and are still
evolving; (2) DOE expects to have only a limited capacity online by
fiscal year (FY) 2007; (3) specifically, DOE plans to reestablish its
capability to produce war reserve pits for one weapons system by FY 2001
and plans to have an interim capacity of 20 pits per year online by FY
2007; (4) this planned capacity differs from the goal that DOE
established in FY 1996 to produce up to 50 pits per year by fiscal 2005;
(5) DOE has not decided what the final production capacity at Los Alamos
will be; (6) DOE has done little to develop a contingency plan for the
large-scale manufacturing of pits (150-500 pits per year); (7)
large-scale manufacturing would be necessary if a systemwide problem
were identified with pits in the stockpile; (8) the current estimated
costs for establishing and operating DOE&apos;s pit-manufacturing mission
total over $1.1 billion from FY 1996 through fiscal 2007; (9) this
estimate does not include over $490 million in costs for other
activities that are not directly attributable to the mission but are
needed to support a wide variety of defense-related activities; (10) GAO
also noted that some key cost and managerial controls related to DOE&apos;s
pit-manufacturing mission are either in the formative stages of
development or do not cover the mission in its entirety; (11) DOD and
DOE have discussed, but not resolved, important issues regarding: (a)
changes in the manufacturing processes that will be used to produce pits
at Los Alamos; and (b) the pit-manufacturing capacity planned by DOE;
(12) officials from various DOD organizations have expressed concerns
about the equivalence of Los Alamo&apos;s pits to the pits previously
manufactured at Rocky Flats because some manufacturing processes will be
new at Los Alamos and are different from those previously used by Rocky
Flats; (13) also, officials from various DOD organizations are not
satisfied that DOE&apos;s current or future capacity plans will be sufficient
to meet the stockpile&apos;s needs; (14) various DOD organizations have
performed preliminary analyses of the capacity needed to support the
stockpile; (15) on the basis of these analyses, some of these officials
believe that the stockpile&apos;s needs exceed the 20-pits-per-year capacity
that DOE may establish in the future; (16) however, DOD officials said
that they will be unable to give detailed pit-manufacturing requirements
until the lifetime of pits is more clearly specified by DOE; and (17)
DOE is currently studying this issue.</abstract>
<location>
 <url displayLabel="HTML rendition" access="raw object">https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/GAOREPORTS-RCED-99-1/html/GAOREPORTS-RCED-99-1.htm</url>
 <url displayLabel="PDF rendition" access="raw object">https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/GAOREPORTS-RCED-99-1/pdf/GAOREPORTS-RCED-99-1.pdf</url>
</location>
<identifier type="preferred citation">GAO/RCED-99-1</identifier>
<location>
 <url displayLabel="Content Detail" access="object in context">https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/GAOREPORTS-RCED-99-1</url>
</location>
<note>Letter Report</note>
<extension>
 <searchTitle>GAO/RCED-99-1; Nuclear Weapons: Key Nuclear Weapons Component Issues Are Unresolved;
            </searchTitle>
</extension>
<subject>
 <topic>Nuclear weapons</topic>
 <topic>Nuclear weapons testing</topic>
 <topic>Interagency relations</topic>
 <topic>Cost effectiveness analysis</topic>
 <topic>Defense capabilities</topic>
 <topic>Cost control</topic>
 <topic>Defense contingency planning</topic>
 <topic>Weapons systems</topic>
 <topic>Atomic energy defense activities</topic>
 <topic>Nuclear weapons plants</topic>
</subject>
</mods>