<mods xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3" version="3.3" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3 http://www.loc.gov/standards/mods/v3/mods-3-3.xsd" ID="P0b002ee18039c6d5">
<name type="corporate">
 <namePart>United States Government Publishing Office</namePart>
 <role>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">publisher</roleTerm>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="code">pbl</roleTerm>
</role>
 <role>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">distributor</roleTerm>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="code">dst</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="corporate">
 <namePart>United States</namePart>
 <namePart>Government Accountability Office</namePart>
 <namePart>Resources, Community, and Economic Development Division</namePart>
 <role>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">author</roleTerm>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="code">aut</roleTerm>
</role>
 <description>Government Organization</description>
</name>
<typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource>
<genre authority="marcgt">government publication</genre>
<language>
 <languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm>
</language>
<extension>
 <collectionCode>GAOREPORTS</collectionCode>
 <category>Legislative Agency Publications</category>
 <waisDatabaseName>gao</waisDatabaseName>
 <branch>legislative</branch>
 <dateIngested>2010-08-12</dateIngested>
</extension>
<originInfo>
 <publisher>U.S. Government Printing Office</publisher>
 <dateIssued encoding="w3cdtf">1998-04-21</dateIssued>
 <issuance>monographic</issuance>
</originInfo>
<physicalDescription>
 <note type="source content type">deposited</note>
 <digitalOrigin>born digital</digitalOrigin>
 <extent>44 p.</extent>
</physicalDescription>
<classification authority="sudocs">GA 1.13:RCED-98-99</classification>
<identifier type="uri">https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/GAOREPORTS-RCED-98-99</identifier>
<identifier type="local">P0b002ee18039c6d5</identifier>
<identifier type="former package identifier">f:rc98099</identifier>
<recordInfo>
 <recordContentSource authority="marcorg">DGPO</recordContentSource>
 <recordCreationDate encoding="w3cdtf">2010-08-12</recordCreationDate>
 <recordChangeDate encoding="w3cdtf">2011-03-28</recordChangeDate>
 <recordIdentifier source="DGPO">GAOREPORTS-RCED-98-99</recordIdentifier>
 <recordOrigin>machine generated</recordOrigin>
 <languageOfCataloging>
  <languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm>
</languageOfCataloging>
</recordInfo>
<accessCondition type="GPO scope determination">fdlp</accessCondition>
<extension>
 <docClass>REPORT</docClass>
 <accessId>GAOREPORTS-RCED-98-99</accessId>
 <reportNumber>RCED-98-99</reportNumber>
 <subject>Fertilizers</subject>
 <subject>Pipeline operations</subject>
 <subject>Ground transportation operations</subject>
 <subject>Competition</subject>
 <subject>Independent regulatory commissions</subject>
 <subject>Transportation rates</subject>
 <subject>Trade regulation</subject>
 <subject>Economic analysis</subject>
 <subject>Congressional oversight</subject>
 <type>Letter Report</type>
 <seriesAbbrev>RCED</seriesAbbrev>
</extension>
<titleInfo>
 <title>Surface Transportation: Issues Associated With Pipeline Regulation By The Surface Transportation Board</title>
</titleInfo>
<abstract>Pursuant to a legislative request, GAO reported on the impact of the
Surface Transportation Board&apos;s (STB) regulation on pipeline
competitiveness and the transportation of anhydrous ammonia, focusing
on: (1) the historical reasons for regulating pipelines; (2) STB&apos;s role
in regulating pipelines, including the number of pipelines regulated by
STB; (3) the ability of alternatives to compete with pipelines that
transport anhydrous ammonia to the Midwest; and (4) issues before
Congress as it examines whether to extend, modify, or rescind STB&apos;s
authority to regulate pipelines.&lt;p/&gt;GAO noted that: (1) historically, the federal government has regulated
the rates charged by interstate pipelines because these pipelines have
the characteristics of natural monopolies and associated cost advantages
that make it difficult for other pipelines or other transportation modes
to compete; (2) the regulation of pipelines has been imposed to ensure
that all shippers have access to pipeline transportation services and
that the rates charged by pipeline carriers for these services are
reasonable and nondiscriminatory; (3) the Interstate Commerce Commission
Termination Act of 1995 limited STB&apos;s role in regulating pipelines by
specifying that the Board can investigate pipeline issues only in
response to a complaint by a shipper or other interested party; (4) the
act also eliminated the requirement for pipeline carriers to file the
rates they charge to transport commodities, which was the sole reporting
requirement for pipelines under the Interstate Commerce Commission&apos;s
(ICC) regulations; (5) over the last 10 years, only five cases
concerning pipeline issues have come before ICC or STB; (6) one factor
that may have limited the number of cases is the use of multiyear
contracts, which makes it less likely that shippers will be dissatisfied
with the rates charged by a pipeline; (7) the ability of alternatives to
pipelines to compete with the two anhydrous ammonia pipelines in the
Midwest varies; (8) while some market areas currently served by the
pipelines also have access to alternatives, other market areas may not;
(9) because of the large number of local markets that exist along the
two midwestern anhydrous ammonia pipelines, GAO was not able to
definitively determine the number of market areas that do or do not have
competitive alternatives to the pipelines; (10) no clear conclusions can
be reached on whether the continued economic regulation of pipelines
under STB&apos;s jurisdiction is needed because such a determination requires
the examination of competition in numerous local markets along 21
pipelines; and (11) however, as Congress considers reauthorizing STB,
issues to consider include: (a) whether pipelines lack effective
competition in a significant number of market areas, and subsequently
have the potential to charge unreasonably high rates; (b) what are the
costs of regulating pipelines; (c) whether the limited number of
pipeline cases in the history of STB and its predecessor indicates that
there is no need for continued regulation; and (d) whether shippers
would have any recourse if SBT&apos;s economic regulation of pipelines were
eliminated.</abstract>
<location>
 <url displayLabel="HTML rendition" access="raw object">https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/GAOREPORTS-RCED-98-99/html/GAOREPORTS-RCED-98-99.htm</url>
 <url displayLabel="PDF rendition" access="raw object">https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/GAOREPORTS-RCED-98-99/pdf/GAOREPORTS-RCED-98-99.pdf</url>
</location>
<identifier type="preferred citation">GAO/RCED-98-99</identifier>
<location>
 <url displayLabel="Content Detail" access="object in context">https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/GAOREPORTS-RCED-98-99</url>
</location>
<note>Letter Report</note>
<extension>
 <searchTitle>GAO/RCED-98-99; Surface Transportation: Issues Associated With Pipeline Regulation By The Surface Transportation Board;
            </searchTitle>
</extension>
<subject>
 <topic>Fertilizers</topic>
 <topic>Pipeline operations</topic>
 <topic>Ground transportation operations</topic>
 <topic>Competition</topic>
 <topic>Independent regulatory commissions</topic>
 <topic>Transportation rates</topic>
 <topic>Trade regulation</topic>
 <topic>Economic analysis</topic>
 <topic>Congressional oversight</topic>
</subject>
</mods>