<mods xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3" version="3.3" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3 http://www.loc.gov/standards/mods/v3/mods-3-3.xsd" ID="P0b002ee18039fcbf">
<name type="corporate">
 <namePart>United States Government Publishing Office</namePart>
 <role>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">publisher</roleTerm>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="code">pbl</roleTerm>
</role>
 <role>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">distributor</roleTerm>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="code">dst</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="corporate">
 <namePart>United States</namePart>
 <namePart>Government Accountability Office</namePart>
 <namePart>Resources, Community, and Economic Development Division</namePart>
 <role>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">author</roleTerm>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="code">aut</roleTerm>
</role>
 <description>Government Organization</description>
</name>
<typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource>
<genre authority="marcgt">government publication</genre>
<language>
 <languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm>
</language>
<extension>
 <collectionCode>GAOREPORTS</collectionCode>
 <category>Legislative Agency Publications</category>
 <waisDatabaseName>gao</waisDatabaseName>
 <branch>legislative</branch>
 <dateIngested>2010-08-12</dateIngested>
</extension>
<originInfo>
 <publisher>U.S. Government Printing Office</publisher>
 <dateIssued encoding="w3cdtf">1998-08-19</dateIssued>
 <issuance>monographic</issuance>
</originInfo>
<physicalDescription>
 <note type="source content type">deposited</note>
 <digitalOrigin>born digital</digitalOrigin>
 <extent>32 p.</extent>
</physicalDescription>
<classification authority="sudocs">GA 1.13:RCED-98-242</classification>
<identifier type="uri">https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/GAOREPORTS-RCED-98-242</identifier>
<identifier type="local">P0b002ee18039fcbf</identifier>
<identifier type="former package identifier">f:rc98242</identifier>
<recordInfo>
 <recordContentSource authority="marcorg">DGPO</recordContentSource>
 <recordCreationDate encoding="w3cdtf">2010-08-12</recordCreationDate>
 <recordChangeDate encoding="w3cdtf">2011-03-24</recordChangeDate>
 <recordIdentifier source="DGPO">GAOREPORTS-RCED-98-242</recordIdentifier>
 <recordOrigin>machine generated</recordOrigin>
 <languageOfCataloging>
  <languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm>
</languageOfCataloging>
</recordInfo>
<accessCondition type="GPO scope determination">fdlp</accessCondition>
<extension>
 <docClass>REPORT</docClass>
 <accessId>GAOREPORTS-RCED-98-242</accessId>
 <reportNumber>RCED-98-242</reportNumber>
 <subject>Gas leases</subject>
 <subject>Intergovernmental fiscal relations</subject>
 <subject>Petroleum industry</subject>
 <subject>Public lands</subject>
 <subject>Royalty payments</subject>
 <subject>Oil leases</subject>
 <identifier>Dept. of the Interior Royalty Management Program</identifier>
 <identifier>California</identifier>
 <identifier>Alaska</identifier>
 <identifier>Alaskan North Slope Oil</identifier>
 <type>Letter Report</type>
 <seriesAbbrev>RCED</seriesAbbrev>
</extension>
<titleInfo>
 <title>Federal Oil Valuation: Efforts to Revise Regulations and an Analysis of Royalties in Kind</title>
</titleInfo>
<abstract>Pursuant to a congressional request, GAO reviewed the Minerals
Management Service&apos;s (MMS) efforts to revise its regulations for valuing
oil from federal leases, focusing on: (1) the information used by MMS to
justify the need for revising its oil valuation regulations; (2) how MMS
has addressed concerns expressed by the oil industry and states in
developing these regulations; and (3) the feasibility of the federal
government&apos;s taking its oil and gas royalties in kind, as indicated by
existing studies and programs.&lt;p/&gt;GAO noted that: (1) in justifying the need to revise its oil valuation
regulations, MMS relied heavily on the findings and recommendations of
an interagency task force--composed of representatives from MMS and the
Departments of Commerce, Energy, Justice, and the Interior--assembled in
1994 by Interior to study the value of oil produced from federal leases
in California; (2) the task force concluded that the major oil
companies&apos; use of posted prices in California to calculate federal
royalties was inappropriate and recommended that the federal oil
valuation regulations be revised; (3) MMS subsequently determined that
in other parts of the country as well, posted prices should not be used
as the basis to calculate royalties on oil from federal leases; (4)
beginning in 1995, MMS solicited public comments on the proposed
regulations in five Federal Register notices; it solicited comments in
each notice and revised its proposed regulations three times in response
to the comments received; (5) however, the agency did not agree with all
the comments it received and in these cases provided reasons for not
incorporating the suggested changes, noting that it planned to seek
input on this issue through other means; (6) in total, the agency asked
for comments on 39 major issues and received 183 letters from states,
representatives of the oil industry, and other parties; (7) on its most
recent revision of the proposed regulations, the agency received 34
comments but has not yet publicly addressed them; (8) information from
studies of royalties in kind, as well as specific royalty-in-kind
programs operated by various entities, indicates that it would not be
feasible for the federal government to take its oil and gas royalties in
kind except under certain conditions; (9) these conditions include
having relatively easy access to pipelines to transport the oil and gas,
leases that produce relatively large volumes of oil and gas, competitive
arrangements for processing gas, and expertise in marketing oil and gas;
(10) however, these conditions are currently lacking for the federal
government and for most federal leases; and (11) specifically, the
federal government does not currently have relatively easy access to
pipelines, has thousands of leases that produce relatively low volumes,
has many gas leases for which competitive processing arrangements do not
exist, and has limited experience in oil and gas marketing.</abstract>
<location>
 <url displayLabel="HTML rendition" access="raw object">https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/GAOREPORTS-RCED-98-242/html/GAOREPORTS-RCED-98-242.htm</url>
 <url displayLabel="PDF rendition" access="raw object">https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/GAOREPORTS-RCED-98-242/pdf/GAOREPORTS-RCED-98-242.pdf</url>
</location>
<identifier type="preferred citation">GAO/RCED-98-242</identifier>
<location>
 <url displayLabel="Content Detail" access="object in context">https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/GAOREPORTS-RCED-98-242</url>
</location>
<note>Letter Report</note>
<extension>
 <searchTitle>GAO/RCED-98-242; Federal Oil Valuation: Efforts to Revise Regulations and an Analysis of Royalties in Kind;
            </searchTitle>
</extension>
<subject>
 <topic>Gas leases</topic>
 <topic>Intergovernmental fiscal relations</topic>
 <topic>Petroleum industry</topic>
 <topic>Public lands</topic>
 <topic>Royalty payments</topic>
 <topic>Oil leases</topic>
 <topic>Dept. of the Interior Royalty Management Program</topic>
 <topic>California</topic>
 <topic>Alaska</topic>
 <topic>Alaskan North Slope Oil</topic>
</subject>
</mods>