<mods xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3" version="3.3" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3 http://www.loc.gov/standards/mods/v3/mods-3-3.xsd" ID="P0b002ee180386b6b">
<name type="corporate">
 <namePart>United States Government Publishing Office</namePart>
 <role>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">publisher</roleTerm>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="code">pbl</roleTerm>
</role>
 <role>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">distributor</roleTerm>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="code">dst</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="corporate">
 <namePart>United States</namePart>
 <namePart>Government Accountability Office</namePart>
 <namePart>Resources, Community, and Economic Development Division</namePart>
 <role>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">author</roleTerm>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="code">aut</roleTerm>
</role>
 <description>Government Organization</description>
</name>
<typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource>
<genre authority="marcgt">government publication</genre>
<language>
 <languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm>
</language>
<extension>
 <collectionCode>GAOREPORTS</collectionCode>
 <category>Legislative Agency Publications</category>
 <waisDatabaseName>gao</waisDatabaseName>
 <branch>legislative</branch>
 <dateIngested>2010-08-12</dateIngested>
</extension>
<originInfo>
 <publisher>U.S. Government Printing Office</publisher>
 <dateIssued encoding="w3cdtf">1998-06-29</dateIssued>
 <issuance>monographic</issuance>
</originInfo>
<physicalDescription>
 <note type="source content type">deposited</note>
 <digitalOrigin>born digital</digitalOrigin>
 <extent>33 p.</extent>
</physicalDescription>
<classification authority="sudocs">GA 1.13:RCED-98-154</classification>
<identifier type="uri">https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/GAOREPORTS-RCED-98-154</identifier>
<identifier type="local">P0b002ee180386b6b</identifier>
<identifier type="former package identifier">f:rc98154</identifier>
<recordInfo>
 <recordContentSource authority="marcorg">DGPO</recordContentSource>
 <recordCreationDate encoding="w3cdtf">2010-08-12</recordCreationDate>
 <recordChangeDate encoding="w3cdtf">2011-03-28</recordChangeDate>
 <recordIdentifier source="DGPO">GAOREPORTS-RCED-98-154</recordIdentifier>
 <recordOrigin>machine generated</recordOrigin>
 <languageOfCataloging>
  <languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm>
</languageOfCataloging>
</recordInfo>
<accessCondition type="GPO scope determination">fdlp</accessCondition>
<extension>
 <docClass>REPORT</docClass>
 <accessId>GAOREPORTS-RCED-98-154</accessId>
 <reportNumber>RCED-98-154</reportNumber>
 <subject>Climate statistics</subject>
 <subject>Atmospheric research</subject>
 <subject>Air pollution control</subject>
 <subject>International cooperation</subject>
 <subject>Environmental monitoring</subject>
 <subject>Projections</subject>
 <subject>Hazardous substances</subject>
 <subject>Energy efficiency</subject>
 <subject>Thermal pollution</subject>
 <subject>Evaluation criteria</subject>
 <identifier>Joint Implementation Pilot Program</identifier>
 <type>Letter Report</type>
 <seriesAbbrev>RCED</seriesAbbrev>
</extension>
<titleInfo>
 <title>Climate Change: Information on the U.S. Initiative on Joint Implementation</title>
</titleInfo>
<abstract>Pursuant to a congressional request, GAO reviewed selected aspects of
the U.S. Initiative on Joint Implementation, focusing on the: (1)
criteria used to accept proposed projects; (2) number and types of
projects accepted; (3) status of the seven projects accepted in the
first round of proposals in February 1995; and (4) estimated benefits of
pilot projects in terms of emissions reductions.&lt;p/&gt;GAO noted that: (1) the Initiative&apos;s Evaluation Panel uses nine criteria
to evaluate proposed projects for acceptance into the program; (2) among
the criteria are acceptance by the host country, a reduction in
greenhouse gases that would result from the proposed project and that
would not have occurred otherwise, and a mechanism to verify the
project&apos;s results; (3) the U.S. program generally has more criteria than
similar programs administered by certain other countries; (4) also, the
U.S. criteria are stricter in some respects, for example, by requiring
that benefits be maintained over time; (5) through March 1998,
Initiative officials had reviewed proposals for 97 different projects
and accepted 32 of them; (6) of the 32 accepted projects, 17 involve
reducing greenhouse gas emissions, for example, by constructing and
operating a hydroelectric plant that will provide electricity previously
produced by burning fossil fuels; (7) the other 15 involve capturing
greenhouse gases already emitted; (8) also, 31 of the 32 projects are
intended to reduce emissions of or capture carbon dioxide; the other
project is intended to reduce methane emissions; (9) of the seven
projects accepted into the Initiative as a result of the first round of
evaluations in February 1995, five are in the process of being
implemented; (10) this means that land has been acquired or facilities
have been built, and the projects are in the process of reducing or
capturing greenhouse gas emissions; (11) according to Initiative
officials, as of March 1998, the remaining two projects--one that would
reduce greenhouse gas emissions and one that would capture these
emissions from the atmosphere--had not progressed because their
developers had not been able to obtain financing; (12) the projects&apos;
developers estimate that, over a period of up to 60 years, the 32
approved projects, if fully funded and implemented, will result in net
emissions reductions of about 200 million metric tons of carbon dioxide
and 1.3 million metric tons of methane; (13) Initiative staff do not
verify or attest to the reliability of the net greenhouse gas benefits
estimated by the projects&apos; developers; (14) in part, this is because
standard methods for estimating projects&apos; emissions reduction benefits
specific to the U.S. Initiative have not been developed; (15) the
Environmental Protection Agency has funded studies to develop standard
methods for calculating projects&apos; benefits; and (16) according to EPA
officials, these studies should be completed by the end of fiscal year
1998.</abstract>
<location>
 <url displayLabel="HTML rendition" access="raw object">https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/GAOREPORTS-RCED-98-154/html/GAOREPORTS-RCED-98-154.htm</url>
 <url displayLabel="PDF rendition" access="raw object">https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/GAOREPORTS-RCED-98-154/pdf/GAOREPORTS-RCED-98-154.pdf</url>
</location>
<identifier type="preferred citation">GAO/RCED-98-154</identifier>
<location>
 <url displayLabel="Content Detail" access="object in context">https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/GAOREPORTS-RCED-98-154</url>
</location>
<note>Letter Report</note>
<extension>
 <searchTitle>GAO/RCED-98-154; Climate Change: Information on the U.S. Initiative on Joint Implementation;
            </searchTitle>
</extension>
<subject>
 <topic>Climate statistics</topic>
 <topic>Atmospheric research</topic>
 <topic>Air pollution control</topic>
 <topic>International cooperation</topic>
 <topic>Environmental monitoring</topic>
 <topic>Projections</topic>
 <topic>Hazardous substances</topic>
 <topic>Energy efficiency</topic>
 <topic>Thermal pollution</topic>
 <topic>Evaluation criteria</topic>
 <topic>Joint Implementation Pilot Program</topic>
</subject>
</mods>