<mods xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3" version="3.3" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3 http://www.loc.gov/standards/mods/v3/mods-3-3.xsd" ID="P0b002ee180389840">
<name type="corporate">
 <namePart>United States Government Publishing Office</namePart>
 <role>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">publisher</roleTerm>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="code">pbl</roleTerm>
</role>
 <role>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">distributor</roleTerm>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="code">dst</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="corporate">
 <namePart>United States</namePart>
 <namePart>Government Accountability Office</namePart>
 <namePart>Resources, Community, and Economic Development Division</namePart>
 <role>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">author</roleTerm>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="code">aut</roleTerm>
</role>
 <description>Government Organization</description>
</name>
<typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource>
<genre authority="marcgt">government publication</genre>
<language>
 <languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm>
</language>
<extension>
 <collectionCode>GAOREPORTS</collectionCode>
 <category>Legislative Agency Publications</category>
 <waisDatabaseName>gao</waisDatabaseName>
 <branch>legislative</branch>
 <dateIngested>2010-08-12</dateIngested>
</extension>
<originInfo>
 <publisher>U.S. Government Printing Office</publisher>
 <dateIssued encoding="w3cdtf">1997-04-17</dateIssued>
 <issuance>monographic</issuance>
</originInfo>
<physicalDescription>
 <note type="source content type">deposited</note>
 <digitalOrigin>born digital</digitalOrigin>
 <extent>156 p.</extent>
</physicalDescription>
<classification authority="sudocs">GA 1.13:RCED-97-70</classification>
<identifier type="uri">https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/GAOREPORTS-RCED-97-70</identifier>
<identifier type="local">P0b002ee180389840</identifier>
<identifier type="former package identifier">f:rc97070</identifier>
<recordInfo>
 <recordContentSource authority="marcorg">DGPO</recordContentSource>
 <recordCreationDate encoding="w3cdtf">2010-08-12</recordCreationDate>
 <recordChangeDate encoding="w3cdtf">2011-03-24</recordChangeDate>
 <recordIdentifier source="DGPO">GAOREPORTS-RCED-97-70</recordIdentifier>
 <recordOrigin>machine generated</recordOrigin>
 <languageOfCataloging>
  <languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm>
</languageOfCataloging>
</recordInfo>
<accessCondition type="GPO scope determination">fdlp</accessCondition>
<extension>
 <docClass>REPORT</docClass>
 <accessId>GAOREPORTS-RCED-97-70</accessId>
 <reportNumber>RCED-97-70</reportNumber>
 <subject>Grain and grain products</subject>
 <subject>Agricultural production</subject>
 <subject>Insurance companies</subject>
 <subject>Insurance losses</subject>
 <subject>Insurance premiums</subject>
 <subject>Administrative costs</subject>
 <subject>Insurance cost control</subject>
 <subject>Farm income stabilization programs</subject>
 <subject>Disaster relief aid</subject>
 <identifier>FCIC Multiple Peril Crop Insurance Program</identifier>
 <identifier>Federal Crop Insurance Program</identifier>
 <type>Chapter Report</type>
 <seriesAbbrev>RCED</seriesAbbrev>
 <law congress="103" isPrivate="false" number="354"></law>
 <law congress="104" isPrivate="false" number="127"></law>
</extension>
<titleInfo>
 <title>Crop Insurance: Opportunities Exist to Reduce Government Costs for Private-Sector Delivery</title>
</titleInfo>
<abstract>Pursuant to a legislative requirement, GAO reviewed the financial
arrangements between the Federal Crop Insurance Corporation (FCIC) and
participating insurance companies for delivering crop insurance to
qualified producers, focusing on the: (1) adequacy of the current
administrative reimbursement rate for expenses of participating crop
insurance companies; (2) comparative cost to the government in 1995 of
private companies&apos; and the Department of Agriculture&apos;s (USDA) delivery
of catastrophic insurance; and (3) advantages and disadvantages of
different expense reimbursement alternatives.&lt;p/&gt;GAO noted that: (1) in 1994 and 1995, the government&apos;s administrative
expense reimbursement to insurance companies was greater than the
companies&apos; expenses to sell and service federal crop insurance; (2) for
the 2-year period, companies reported expenses that were less than the
reimbursements paid to them by FCIC; (3) furthermore, GAO found that
some of these reported expenses did not appear to be reasonably
associated with the sale and service of federal crop insurance and
accordingly should not be considered in determining an appropriate
future reimbursement rate for administrative expenses; (4) in addition,
even within the expense categories reasonably associated with the sale
and service of crop insurance, GAO found expenses that appeared
excessive for reimbursement under a taxpayer-supported program
suggesting an opportunity to further reduce future reimbursement rates;
(5) these expenses included agents&apos; commissions that exceeded the
industry average, unnecessary travel-related expenses, and questionable
entertainment activities; (6) finally, higher premiums in the crop
insurance program have had the effect of increasing the government&apos;s
reimbursement to companies for the time period GAO examined; (7) at the
same time, companies&apos; expenses associated with crop insurance sales and
service could decrease as FCIC reduces the administrative requirements
with which the companies must comply; (8) combined, all these factors
indicate that FCIC could lower the reimbursement rate and still amply
cover companies&apos; reasonable expenses for selling and servicing federal
crop insurance policies; (9) in 1995, the government&apos;s costs to deliver
catastrophic insurance were higher through private companies than
through USDA; (10) although the basic costs associated with selling and
servicing catastrophic crop insurance through USDA and private companies
were comparable, delivery through USDA avoids paying an underwriting
gain to companies in years when there is a low incidence of catastrophic
loss claims; (11) in 1995, the underwriting gain to participating
companies for catastrophic insurance totalled about $45 million; (12) in
1996, the underwriting gains were even higher; (13) GAO identified a
number of different approaches to reimbursing companies for their
administrative expenses that offer the opportunity for cost savings;
(14) each has advantages and disadvantages compared with the existing r*</abstract>
<location>
 <url displayLabel="HTML rendition" access="raw object">https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/GAOREPORTS-RCED-97-70/html/GAOREPORTS-RCED-97-70.htm</url>
 <url displayLabel="PDF rendition" access="raw object">https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/GAOREPORTS-RCED-97-70/pdf/GAOREPORTS-RCED-97-70.pdf</url>
</location>
<identifier type="preferred citation">GAO/RCED-97-70</identifier>
<location>
 <url displayLabel="Content Detail" access="object in context">https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/GAOREPORTS-RCED-97-70</url>
</location>
<note>Chapter Report</note>
<extension>
 <searchTitle>GAO/RCED-97-70; Crop Insurance: Opportunities Exist to Reduce Government Costs for Private-Sector Delivery;
            </searchTitle>
</extension>
<subject>
 <topic>Grain and grain products</topic>
 <topic>Agricultural production</topic>
 <topic>Insurance companies</topic>
 <topic>Insurance losses</topic>
 <topic>Insurance premiums</topic>
 <topic>Administrative costs</topic>
 <topic>Insurance cost control</topic>
 <topic>Farm income stabilization programs</topic>
 <topic>Disaster relief aid</topic>
 <topic>FCIC Multiple Peril Crop Insurance Program</topic>
 <topic>Federal Crop Insurance Program</topic>
</subject>
<relatedItem type="isReferencedBy">
 <titleInfo>
  <title>United States Public Law 354 (103rd Congress)</title>
</titleInfo>
 <identifier type="public law citation">Public Law 103-354</identifier>
</relatedItem>
<relatedItem type="isReferencedBy">
 <titleInfo>
  <title>United States Public Law 127 (104th Congress)</title>
</titleInfo>
 <identifier type="public law citation">Public Law 104-127</identifier>
</relatedItem>
</mods>