<mods xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3" version="3.3" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3 http://www.loc.gov/standards/mods/v3/mods-3-3.xsd" ID="P0b002ee1803740bb">
<name type="corporate">
 <namePart>United States Government Publishing Office</namePart>
 <role>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">publisher</roleTerm>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="code">pbl</roleTerm>
</role>
 <role>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">distributor</roleTerm>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="code">dst</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="corporate">
 <namePart>United States</namePart>
 <namePart>Government Accountability Office</namePart>
 <namePart>Resources, Community, and Economic Development Division</namePart>
 <role>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">author</roleTerm>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="code">aut</roleTerm>
</role>
 <description>Government Organization</description>
</name>
<typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource>
<genre authority="marcgt">government publication</genre>
<language>
 <languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm>
</language>
<extension>
 <collectionCode>GAOREPORTS</collectionCode>
 <category>Legislative Agency Publications</category>
 <waisDatabaseName>gao</waisDatabaseName>
 <branch>legislative</branch>
 <dateIngested>2010-08-12</dateIngested>
</extension>
<originInfo>
 <publisher>U.S. Government Printing Office</publisher>
 <dateIssued encoding="w3cdtf">1996-12-12</dateIssued>
 <issuance>monographic</issuance>
</originInfo>
<physicalDescription>
 <note type="source content type">deposited</note>
 <digitalOrigin>born digital</digitalOrigin>
 <extent>124 p.</extent>
</physicalDescription>
<classification authority="sudocs">GA 1.13:RCED-97-6</classification>
<identifier type="uri">https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/GAOREPORTS-RCED-97-6</identifier>
<identifier type="local">P0b002ee1803740bb</identifier>
<identifier type="former package identifier">f:rc97006</identifier>
<recordInfo>
 <recordContentSource authority="marcorg">DGPO</recordContentSource>
 <recordCreationDate encoding="w3cdtf">2010-08-12</recordCreationDate>
 <recordChangeDate encoding="w3cdtf">2011-03-28</recordChangeDate>
 <recordIdentifier source="DGPO">GAOREPORTS-RCED-97-6</recordIdentifier>
 <recordOrigin>machine generated</recordOrigin>
 <languageOfCataloging>
  <languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm>
</languageOfCataloging>
</recordInfo>
<accessCondition type="GPO scope determination">fdlp</accessCondition>
<extension>
 <docClass>REPORT</docClass>
 <accessId>GAOREPORTS-RCED-97-6</accessId>
 <reportNumber>RCED-97-6</reportNumber>
 <subject>Oil importing</subject>
 <subject>Domestic crude oil</subject>
 <subject>Economic policies</subject>
 <subject>Energy supplies</subject>
 <subject>Energy consumption</subject>
 <subject>Alternative energy sources</subject>
 <subject>Fuel research</subject>
 <subject>Petroleum prices</subject>
 <subject>Energy efficiency</subject>
 <subject>Energy shortages</subject>
 <identifier>DOE National Energy Policy Plan</identifier>
 <identifier>Persian Gulf</identifier>
 <identifier>Strategic Petroleum Reserve</identifier>
 <identifier>Project Independence</identifier>
 <identifier>EIA National Energy Modeling System</identifier>
 <identifier>EIA Annual Energy Outlook</identifier>
 <identifier>Gross Domestic Product</identifier>
 <identifier>North American Free Trade Agreement</identifier>
 <identifier>DOE Oil Technology Program</identifier>
 <identifier>NAFTA</identifier>
 <identifier>Europe</identifier>
 <identifier>Japan</identifier>
 <identifier>Germany</identifier>
 <identifier>United Kingdom</identifier>
 <identifier>France</identifier>
 <identifier>Italy</identifier>
 <type>Chapter Report</type>
 <seriesAbbrev>RCED</seriesAbbrev>
</extension>
<titleInfo>
 <title>Energy Security: Evaluating U.S. Vulnerability to Oil Supply Disruptions and Options for Mitigating Their Effects</title>
</titleInfo>
<abstract>Pursuant to a congressional request, GAO reviewed the effectiveness of
the Administration&apos;s 1995 National Energy Policy Plan (NEPP) in reducing
the vulnerability of the U.S. economy to oil supply disruptions and
price shocks, focusing on: (1) the economic benefits of importing oil
compared with the potential economic costs of vulnerability to oil
shocks; (2) the extent to which the U.S. economy&apos;s vulnerability to oil
shocks will likely change over time given the programs and policies
contained in the Administration&apos;s 1995 NEPP and other relevant factors;
and (3) options for reducing the economy&apos;s vulnerability to oil shocks.&lt;p/&gt;GAO found that: (1) the U.S. economy realizes hundreds of billions of
dollars in benefits annually by using relatively low cost imported oil
rather than relying on more expensive domestic sources of energy; (2) by
comparison, oil shocks impose large but infrequent economic costs that,
when annualized, are estimated to cost the U.S. economy tens of billions
of dollars per year; (3) the economic costs of oil price shocks depend
largely upon the rise in the price of oil coupled with the nation&apos;s
level of oil consumption, rather than the level of imports; (4) as long
as market forces prevail, world and domestic oil prices will be the same
and will rise and fall with changes in world oil market conditions; (5)
under these conditions, an incremental decrease in oil imports would
reduce the benefits of such imports without substantially lowering the
costs of oil price shocks; (6) oil supply disruptions impose significant
economic costs, and reliance on imported oil imposes military and other
costs that are not easily measured; (7) while adopting the NEPP&apos;s
initiatives may keep the economy&apos;s vulnerability to oil supply
disruptions below what it otherwise would be, the Energy Information
Administration&apos;s forecasts indicate that by most measures the economy
will not likely be significantly less vulnerable through 2015, primarily
because the demand for oil is projected to increase; (8) only over a
longer period do energy analysts anticipate significant improvement, and
that depends on technological advances in such areas as energy
efficiency and alternative fuels; (9) while their views varied, almost
all of the experts GAO consulted about options for reducing the
economy&apos;s vulnerability to oil supply disruptions said that, in the
short run, the United States should rely on rapid and large releases of
oil from the Strategic Petroleum Reserve to blunt price increases at the
onset of an oil supply disruption; and (10) in the long run, the experts
generally favored research to develop cost-competitive alternatives to
petroleum.</abstract>
<location>
 <url displayLabel="HTML rendition" access="raw object">https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/GAOREPORTS-RCED-97-6/html/GAOREPORTS-RCED-97-6.htm</url>
 <url displayLabel="PDF rendition" access="raw object">https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/GAOREPORTS-RCED-97-6/pdf/GAOREPORTS-RCED-97-6.pdf</url>
</location>
<identifier type="preferred citation">GAO/RCED-97-6</identifier>
<location>
 <url displayLabel="Content Detail" access="object in context">https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/GAOREPORTS-RCED-97-6</url>
</location>
<note>Chapter Report</note>
<extension>
 <searchTitle>GAO/RCED-97-6; Energy Security: Evaluating U.S. Vulnerability to Oil Supply Disruptions and Options for Mitigating Their Effects;
            </searchTitle>
</extension>
<subject>
 <topic>Oil importing</topic>
 <topic>Domestic crude oil</topic>
 <topic>Economic policies</topic>
 <topic>Energy supplies</topic>
 <topic>Energy consumption</topic>
 <topic>Alternative energy sources</topic>
 <topic>Fuel research</topic>
 <topic>Petroleum prices</topic>
 <topic>Energy efficiency</topic>
 <topic>Energy shortages</topic>
 <topic>DOE National Energy Policy Plan</topic>
 <topic>Persian Gulf</topic>
 <topic>Strategic Petroleum Reserve</topic>
 <topic>Project Independence</topic>
 <topic>EIA National Energy Modeling System</topic>
 <topic>EIA Annual Energy Outlook</topic>
 <topic>Gross Domestic Product</topic>
 <topic>North American Free Trade Agreement</topic>
 <topic>DOE Oil Technology Program</topic>
 <topic>NAFTA</topic>
 <topic>Europe</topic>
 <topic>Japan</topic>
 <topic>Germany</topic>
 <topic>United Kingdom</topic>
 <topic>France</topic>
 <topic>Italy</topic>
</subject>
</mods>