<mods xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3" version="3.3" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3 http://www.loc.gov/standards/mods/v3/mods-3-3.xsd" ID="P0b002ee180379ffa">
<name type="corporate">
 <namePart>United States Government Publishing Office</namePart>
 <role>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">publisher</roleTerm>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="code">pbl</roleTerm>
</role>
 <role>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">distributor</roleTerm>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="code">dst</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="corporate">
 <namePart>United States</namePart>
 <namePart>Government Accountability Office</namePart>
 <namePart>Resources, Community, and Economic Development Division</namePart>
 <role>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">author</roleTerm>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="code">aut</roleTerm>
</role>
 <description>Government Organization</description>
</name>
<typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource>
<genre authority="marcgt">government publication</genre>
<language>
 <languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm>
</language>
<extension>
 <collectionCode>GAOREPORTS</collectionCode>
 <category>Legislative Agency Publications</category>
 <waisDatabaseName>gao</waisDatabaseName>
 <branch>legislative</branch>
 <dateIngested>2010-08-12</dateIngested>
</extension>
<originInfo>
 <publisher>U.S. Government Printing Office</publisher>
 <dateIssued encoding="w3cdtf">1997-01-02</dateIssued>
 <issuance>monographic</issuance>
</originInfo>
<physicalDescription>
 <note type="source content type">deposited</note>
 <digitalOrigin>born digital</digitalOrigin>
 <extent>21 p.</extent>
</physicalDescription>
<classification authority="sudocs">GA 1.13:RCED-97-39</classification>
<identifier type="uri">https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/GAOREPORTS-RCED-97-39</identifier>
<identifier type="local">P0b002ee180379ffa</identifier>
<identifier type="former package identifier">f:rc97039</identifier>
<recordInfo>
 <recordContentSource authority="marcorg">DGPO</recordContentSource>
 <recordCreationDate encoding="w3cdtf">2010-08-12</recordCreationDate>
 <recordChangeDate encoding="w3cdtf">2011-03-23</recordChangeDate>
 <recordIdentifier source="DGPO">GAOREPORTS-RCED-97-39</recordIdentifier>
 <recordOrigin>machine generated</recordOrigin>
 <languageOfCataloging>
  <languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm>
</languageOfCataloging>
</recordInfo>
<accessCondition type="GPO scope determination">fdlp</accessCondition>
<extension>
 <docClass>REPORT</docClass>
 <accessId>GAOREPORTS-RCED-97-39</accessId>
 <reportNumber>RCED-97-39</reportNumber>
 <subject>International agreements</subject>
 <subject>International relations</subject>
 <subject>Nuclear powerplant safety</subject>
 <subject>Noncompliance</subject>
 <subject>Accident prevention</subject>
 <subject>Cost analysis</subject>
 <subject>Foreign governments</subject>
 <subject>Treaties</subject>
 <subject>Nuclear reactors</subject>
 <identifier>Chernobyl Nuclear Powerplant (USSR)</identifier>
 <identifier>France</identifier>
 <identifier>Japan</identifier>
 <identifier>United Kingdom</identifier>
 <identifier>Russia</identifier>
 <identifier>Vienna (Austria)</identifier>
 <identifier>Convention on Nuclear Safety</identifier>
 <type>Letter Report</type>
 <seriesAbbrev>RCED</seriesAbbrev>
</extension>
<titleInfo>
 <title>Nuclear Safety: Uncertainties About the Implementation and Costs of the Nuclear Safety Convention</title>
</titleInfo>
<abstract>Pursuant to a congressional request, GAO reviewed implementation of the
Convention on Nuclear Safety, focusing on: (1) how compliance with the
Convention&apos;s terms and obligations will be reviewed by the ratifying
countries; and (2) the potential costs to the United States to
participate in the Convention.&lt;p/&gt;GAO found that: (1) the method to review compliance with the Convention
on Nuclear Safety has not been finalized; (2) the Convention does not
impose sanctions for noncompliance but seeks to encourage compliance
through peer pressure; (3) the Convention relies on each ratifying
country to prepare a self-assessment report of its nuclear power
program; (4) these reports will, in turn, be reviewed by other member
countries at periodic meetings to determine how each country is
complying with the Convention; (5) the level of detail to be included in
these reports has not been finalized, nor has the process by which
countries will critically review these reports been fully determined;
(6) as the method is currently envisioned, groups composed of five or
six countries would form the core of the review process; (7) the
countries with the greatest number of operating nuclear reactors, the
United States, France, Japan, the United Kingdom, and Russia, would
participate in separate review groups made up primarily of several other
countries with operating reactors; (8) although U.S. government
officials did not originally favor the country-grouping approach, they
believe the United States will have adequate opportunities to review the
safety programs of all countries through other mechanisms established by
the Convention; (9) the costs associated with the United States&apos;
participation in the Convention have not been fully determined; (10) the
Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC), the Department of State, and the
Department of Energy have estimated that it could cost as much as $1.1
million to participate in planning meetings to develop the Convention&apos;s
policies and procedures, prepare the first U.S. self-assessment report,
review other countries&apos; reports, and participate in the first review
meeting; (11) other costs, a portion of which the United States will
incur, associated with the International Atomic Energy Agency&apos;s
administration of the Convention are less certain but could range up to
$10.3 million through the first review meeting, according to a 1993
estimate; (12) NRC officials believe, however, that the actual costs
will be significantly less, about $1 million to administer the first
review meeting; and (13) the costs for subsequent review meetings have
not been estimated.</abstract>
<location>
 <url displayLabel="HTML rendition" access="raw object">https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/GAOREPORTS-RCED-97-39/html/GAOREPORTS-RCED-97-39.htm</url>
 <url displayLabel="PDF rendition" access="raw object">https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/GAOREPORTS-RCED-97-39/pdf/GAOREPORTS-RCED-97-39.pdf</url>
</location>
<identifier type="preferred citation">GAO/RCED-97-39</identifier>
<location>
 <url displayLabel="Content Detail" access="object in context">https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/GAOREPORTS-RCED-97-39</url>
</location>
<note>Letter Report</note>
<extension>
 <searchTitle>GAO/RCED-97-39; Nuclear Safety: Uncertainties About the Implementation and Costs of the Nuclear Safety Convention;
            </searchTitle>
</extension>
<subject>
 <topic>International agreements</topic>
 <topic>International relations</topic>
 <topic>Nuclear powerplant safety</topic>
 <topic>Noncompliance</topic>
 <topic>Accident prevention</topic>
 <topic>Cost analysis</topic>
 <topic>Foreign governments</topic>
 <topic>Treaties</topic>
 <topic>Nuclear reactors</topic>
 <topic>Chernobyl Nuclear Powerplant (USSR)</topic>
 <topic>France</topic>
 <topic>Japan</topic>
 <topic>United Kingdom</topic>
 <topic>Russia</topic>
 <topic>Vienna (Austria)</topic>
 <topic>Convention on Nuclear Safety</topic>
</subject>
</mods>