<mods xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3" version="3.3" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3 http://www.loc.gov/standards/mods/v3/mods-3-3.xsd" ID="P0b002ee18039a8be">
<name type="corporate">
 <namePart>United States Government Publishing Office</namePart>
 <role>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">publisher</roleTerm>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="code">pbl</roleTerm>
</role>
 <role>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">distributor</roleTerm>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="code">dst</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="corporate">
 <namePart>United States</namePart>
 <namePart>Government Accountability Office</namePart>
 <namePart>Resources, Community, and Economic Development Division</namePart>
 <role>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">author</roleTerm>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="code">aut</roleTerm>
</role>
 <description>Government Organization</description>
</name>
<typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource>
<genre authority="marcgt">government publication</genre>
<language>
 <languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm>
</language>
<extension>
 <collectionCode>GAOREPORTS</collectionCode>
 <category>Legislative Agency Publications</category>
 <waisDatabaseName>gao</waisDatabaseName>
 <branch>legislative</branch>
 <dateIngested>2010-08-12</dateIngested>
</extension>
<originInfo>
 <publisher>U.S. Government Printing Office</publisher>
 <dateIssued encoding="w3cdtf">1997-07-24</dateIssued>
 <issuance>monographic</issuance>
</originInfo>
<physicalDescription>
 <note type="source content type">deposited</note>
 <digitalOrigin>born digital</digitalOrigin>
 <extent>26 p.</extent>
</physicalDescription>
<classification authority="sudocs">GA 1.13:RCED-97-181</classification>
<identifier type="uri">https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/GAOREPORTS-RCED-97-181</identifier>
<identifier type="local">P0b002ee18039a8be</identifier>
<identifier type="former package identifier">f:rc97181</identifier>
<recordInfo>
 <recordContentSource authority="marcorg">DGPO</recordContentSource>
 <recordCreationDate encoding="w3cdtf">2010-08-12</recordCreationDate>
 <recordChangeDate encoding="w3cdtf">2011-03-23</recordChangeDate>
 <recordIdentifier source="DGPO">GAOREPORTS-RCED-97-181</recordIdentifier>
 <recordOrigin>machine generated</recordOrigin>
 <languageOfCataloging>
  <languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm>
</languageOfCataloging>
</recordInfo>
<accessCondition type="GPO scope determination">fdlp</accessCondition>
<extension>
 <docClass>REPORT</docClass>
 <accessId>GAOREPORTS-RCED-97-181</accessId>
 <reportNumber>RCED-97-181</reportNumber>
 <subject>Waste disposal</subject>
 <subject>Environment evaluation</subject>
 <subject>Environmental policies</subject>
 <subject>Hazardous substances</subject>
 <subject>Cost control</subject>
 <subject>Inspection</subject>
 <subject>Intergovernmental relations</subject>
 <subject>Federal agency reorganization</subject>
 <identifier>Superfund Program</identifier>
 <identifier>Superfund Accelerated Cleanup Model</identifier>
 <identifier>EPA National Priorities List</identifier>
 <identifier>EPA Preremedial Program</identifier>
 <identifier>EPA Remedial Program</identifier>
 <type>Other Written Product</type>
 <seriesAbbrev>RCED</seriesAbbrev>
</extension>
<titleInfo>
 <title>Superfund: Integrated Site Assessments May Expedite Cleanups</title>
</titleInfo>
<abstract>Pursuant to a congressional request, GAO reviewed the efficiency of the
Superfund process, focusing on: (1) whether integrated site assessments
have the potential to expedite hazardous waste cleanups, reduce their
costs, and improve coordination among various Superfund units; (2) the
Environmental Protection Agency&apos;s (EPA) implementation of this approach;
and (3) any factors that could limit the use of integrated site
assessments.&lt;p/&gt;GAO noted that: (1) integrated site assessments have the potential to
expedite the Superfund process; (2) in pilot tests conducted from about
1991 to 1995 in seven EPA regions, integrated assessments made data
collection significantly more efficient, reducing the time for
processing and study by 3 months to 4 years; (3) three of the pilot
tests also quantified cost savings, which ranged from almost $3,000 to
$300,000; (4) EPA has not fully evaluated the effects of integrated
assessments on its cleanup operations, but an internal agency study
concluded that certain integrated assessments produced 20 percent time
savings; (5) in addition, according to regional officials GAO
interviewed, the integrated approach, though not suited to all sites,
can improve the Superfund process by reducing sampling, duplication of
effort, and inactive periods between steps in the process; (6) the
officials also reported that the approach promotes coordination among
EPA&apos;s cleanup units, thereby improving decisions on the selection and
timing of cleanup actions and focusing resources on the sites that pose
the greatest risks to human health and the environment; (7) despite the
potential benefits of the integrated approach, EPA&apos;s regions have not
yet fully or consistently implemented it; (8) some regions have used it
extensively, while others have very little experience with it; (9) the
regions have also varied in their implementation of the approach,
consolidating different data collection steps and reorganizing their
programs to varying degrees to improve coordination and streamline data
collection; (10) in addition, some regions have developed written
guidance on implementing integrated assessments, while others have not;
(11) two principal factors may be impeding the wider, more consistent
use of integrated site assessments; (12) EPA headquarters has not
followed through to ensure the effectiveness of the regions&apos;
implementation of the approach; (13) for example, although the agency
developed initial implementing guidance and published summaries of the
regional pilot tests&apos; findings, it has not systematically measured the
impact of the approach on the time and costs of Superfund cleanups or
examined differences in the regions&apos; use of the approach to identify
best practices that could be implemented elsewhere; (14) according to
EPA headquarters officials, the agency has not had the resources to
provide more extensive oversight; and (15) the integration of site
assessments can be difficult because of varying data requirements and
operating methods among the separate Superfund units that conduct
assessments.</abstract>
<location>
 <url displayLabel="HTML rendition" access="raw object">https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/GAOREPORTS-RCED-97-181/html/GAOREPORTS-RCED-97-181.htm</url>
 <url displayLabel="PDF rendition" access="raw object">https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/GAOREPORTS-RCED-97-181/pdf/GAOREPORTS-RCED-97-181.pdf</url>
</location>
<identifier type="preferred citation">GAO/RCED-97-181</identifier>
<location>
 <url displayLabel="Content Detail" access="object in context">https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/GAOREPORTS-RCED-97-181</url>
</location>
<note>Other Written Product</note>
<extension>
 <searchTitle>GAO/RCED-97-181; Superfund: Integrated Site Assessments May Expedite Cleanups;
            </searchTitle>
</extension>
<subject>
 <topic>Waste disposal</topic>
 <topic>Environment evaluation</topic>
 <topic>Environmental policies</topic>
 <topic>Hazardous substances</topic>
 <topic>Cost control</topic>
 <topic>Inspection</topic>
 <topic>Intergovernmental relations</topic>
 <topic>Federal agency reorganization</topic>
 <topic>Superfund Program</topic>
 <topic>Superfund Accelerated Cleanup Model</topic>
 <topic>EPA National Priorities List</topic>
 <topic>EPA Preremedial Program</topic>
 <topic>EPA Remedial Program</topic>
</subject>
</mods>