<mods xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3" version="3.3" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3 http://www.loc.gov/standards/mods/v3/mods-3-3.xsd" ID="P0b002ee180378097">
<name type="corporate">
 <namePart>United States Government Publishing Office</namePart>
 <role>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">publisher</roleTerm>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="code">pbl</roleTerm>
</role>
 <role>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">distributor</roleTerm>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="code">dst</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="corporate">
 <namePart>United States</namePart>
 <namePart>Government Accountability Office</namePart>
 <namePart>Resources, Community, and Economic Development Division</namePart>
 <role>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">author</roleTerm>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="code">aut</roleTerm>
</role>
 <description>Government Organization</description>
</name>
<typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource>
<genre authority="marcgt">government publication</genre>
<language>
 <languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm>
</language>
<extension>
 <collectionCode>GAOREPORTS</collectionCode>
 <category>Legislative Agency Publications</category>
 <waisDatabaseName>gao</waisDatabaseName>
 <branch>legislative</branch>
 <dateIngested>2010-08-12</dateIngested>
</extension>
<originInfo>
 <publisher>U.S. Government Printing Office</publisher>
 <dateIssued encoding="w3cdtf">1997-07-17</dateIssued>
 <issuance>monographic</issuance>
</originInfo>
<physicalDescription>
 <note type="source content type">deposited</note>
 <digitalOrigin>born digital</digitalOrigin>
 <extent>40 p.</extent>
</physicalDescription>
<classification authority="sudocs">GA 1.13:RCED-97-170</classification>
<identifier type="uri">https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/GAOREPORTS-RCED-97-170</identifier>
<identifier type="local">P0b002ee180378097</identifier>
<identifier type="former package identifier">f:rc97170</identifier>
<recordInfo>
 <recordContentSource authority="marcorg">DGPO</recordContentSource>
 <recordCreationDate encoding="w3cdtf">2010-08-12</recordCreationDate>
 <recordChangeDate encoding="w3cdtf">2011-03-28</recordChangeDate>
 <recordIdentifier source="DGPO">GAOREPORTS-RCED-97-170</recordIdentifier>
 <recordOrigin>machine generated</recordOrigin>
 <languageOfCataloging>
  <languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm>
</languageOfCataloging>
</recordInfo>
<accessCondition type="GPO scope determination">fdlp</accessCondition>
<extension>
 <docClass>REPORT</docClass>
 <accessId>GAOREPORTS-RCED-97-170</accessId>
 <reportNumber>RCED-97-170</reportNumber>
 <subject>Federal aid for highways</subject>
 <subject>Public roads or highways</subject>
 <subject>Highway planning</subject>
 <subject>Road construction</subject>
 <subject>Cost control</subject>
 <subject>Cost sharing (finance)</subject>
 <subject>Municipal bonds</subject>
 <subject>Intergovernmental fiscal relations</subject>
 <subject>Future budget projections</subject>
 <subject>Workers compensation</subject>
 <identifier>Central Artery/Tunnel Project (Boston, MA)</identifier>
 <identifier>Interstate Highway System</identifier>
 <identifier>Logan International Airport (Boston, MA)</identifier>
 <identifier>Massachusetts</identifier>
 <identifier>Boston (MA)</identifier>
 <type>Letter Report</type>
 <seriesAbbrev>RCED</seriesAbbrev>
</extension>
<titleInfo>
 <title>Transportation Infrastructure: Progress On and Challenges to Central Artery/Tunnel Project&apos;s Costs and Financing</title>
</titleInfo>
<abstract>Pursuant to a congressional request, GAO evaluated: (1) the estimated
cost of the Central Artery/Tunnel project in Boston, Massachusetts; and
(2) Massachusetts&apos; plans for financing the project.&lt;p/&gt;GAO noted that: (1) as of March 1997, Massachusetts had estimated that
the total cost of the Central Artery/Tunnel project was $10.8
billion--$400 million more than the $10.4-billion estimate contained in
its September 1996 finance plan; (2) this increase occurred primarily
because of growth in the project&apos;s estimated construction costs; (3)
costs actually increased by more than $400 million, but the state
assumed in its $10.8-billion cost estimate that the increases would be
partly offset by savings, primarily from the project&apos;s owner-controlled
insurance program; (4) however, the state also assumed that most of
these insurance savings, $778 million, would not be realized until 2017,
long after construction is completed; (5) as a result, the project&apos;s
total funding needs through 2004, when the project is scheduled to be
completed, are $11.6 billion--$778 million more than the project&apos;s
$10.8- billion cost estimate, (6) furthermore, uncertainties exist about
whether the savings projected by the state in the insurance program will
be achieved; (7) the state&apos;s $10.8-billion cost estimate also depends on
achieving the aggressive cost containment goals established for the
project; (8) while the state has made some progress in its cost
containment program, officials acknowledge that it has some ambitious
goals that will be difficult to meet; (9) Massachusetts has implemented
a plan to finance its share of the project&apos;s cost, including a strategy
to finance funding shortfalls; (10) furthermore, funding shortfalls
could be an additional $100 million to $500 million more if the state
does not meet its cost containment; (11) to finance the shortfalls, the
state plans to borrow $1.7 billion through a combination of revenue
bonds issued by the Massachusetts Turnpike Authority and grant
anticipation notes, as authorized by legislation passed in 1997; (12)
however, this plan may be insufficient to meet the project&apos;s financing
needs because it substantially covers the funding shortfalls only under
the best-case scenario modeled in the feasibility study; (13) in
addition, while the financial markets will decide whether the use of
grant anticipation notes is feasible, uncertainties exist about the use
these notes because the amount proposed by Massachusetts is
unprecedented and relies on borrowing against federal funds that may not
be authorized by the Congress until after the next federal highway
authorization expires, sometime around 2003; and (14) the state imposed
additional limits on itself to constrain the growth of state debt in
order to improve its credit ratings.</abstract>
<location>
 <url displayLabel="HTML rendition" access="raw object">https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/GAOREPORTS-RCED-97-170/html/GAOREPORTS-RCED-97-170.htm</url>
 <url displayLabel="PDF rendition" access="raw object">https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/GAOREPORTS-RCED-97-170/pdf/GAOREPORTS-RCED-97-170.pdf</url>
</location>
<identifier type="preferred citation">GAO/RCED-97-170</identifier>
<location>
 <url displayLabel="Content Detail" access="object in context">https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/GAOREPORTS-RCED-97-170</url>
</location>
<note>Letter Report</note>
<extension>
 <searchTitle>GAO/RCED-97-170; Transportation Infrastructure: Progress On and Challenges to Central Artery/Tunnel Project&apos;s Costs and Financing;
            </searchTitle>
</extension>
<subject>
 <topic>Federal aid for highways</topic>
 <topic>Public roads or highways</topic>
 <topic>Highway planning</topic>
 <topic>Road construction</topic>
 <topic>Cost control</topic>
 <topic>Cost sharing (finance)</topic>
 <topic>Municipal bonds</topic>
 <topic>Intergovernmental fiscal relations</topic>
 <topic>Future budget projections</topic>
 <topic>Workers compensation</topic>
 <topic>Central Artery/Tunnel Project (Boston, MA)</topic>
 <topic>Interstate Highway System</topic>
 <topic>Logan International Airport (Boston, MA)</topic>
 <topic>Massachusetts</topic>
 <topic>Boston (MA)</topic>
</subject>
</mods>