<mods xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3" version="3.3" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3 http://www.loc.gov/standards/mods/v3/mods-3-3.xsd" ID="P0b002ee18038c3bf">
<name type="corporate">
 <namePart>United States Government Publishing Office</namePart>
 <role>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">publisher</roleTerm>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="code">pbl</roleTerm>
</role>
 <role>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">distributor</roleTerm>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="code">dst</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="corporate">
 <namePart>United States</namePart>
 <namePart>Government Accountability Office</namePart>
 <namePart>Resources, Community, and Economic Development Division</namePart>
 <role>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">author</roleTerm>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="code">aut</roleTerm>
</role>
 <description>Government Organization</description>
</name>
<typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource>
<genre authority="marcgt">government publication</genre>
<language>
 <languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm>
</language>
<extension>
 <collectionCode>GAOREPORTS</collectionCode>
 <category>Legislative Agency Publications</category>
 <waisDatabaseName>gao</waisDatabaseName>
 <branch>legislative</branch>
 <dateIngested>2010-08-12</dateIngested>
</extension>
<originInfo>
 <publisher>U.S. Government Printing Office</publisher>
 <dateIssued encoding="w3cdtf">1995-03-06</dateIssued>
 <issuance>monographic</issuance>
</originInfo>
<physicalDescription>
 <note type="source content type">deposited</note>
 <digitalOrigin>born digital</digitalOrigin>
 <extent>34 p.</extent>
</physicalDescription>
<classification authority="sudocs">GA 1.13:RCED-95-74</classification>
<identifier type="uri">https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/GAOREPORTS-RCED-95-74</identifier>
<identifier type="local">P0b002ee18038c3bf</identifier>
<identifier type="former package identifier">f:rc95074</identifier>
<recordInfo>
 <recordContentSource authority="marcorg">DGPO</recordContentSource>
 <recordCreationDate encoding="w3cdtf">2010-08-12</recordCreationDate>
 <recordChangeDate encoding="w3cdtf">2011-03-28</recordChangeDate>
 <recordIdentifier source="DGPO">GAOREPORTS-RCED-95-74</recordIdentifier>
 <recordOrigin>machine generated</recordOrigin>
 <languageOfCataloging>
  <languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm>
</languageOfCataloging>
</recordInfo>
<accessCondition type="GPO scope determination">fdlp</accessCondition>
<extension>
 <docClass>REPORT</docClass>
 <accessId>GAOREPORTS-RCED-95-74</accessId>
 <reportNumber>RCED-95-74</reportNumber>
 <subject>Colleges/universities</subject>
 <subject>Research programs</subject>
 <subject>Administrative costs</subject>
 <subject>Overhead costs</subject>
 <subject>Accounting procedures</subject>
 <subject>Cost control</subject>
 <subject>Research and development costs</subject>
 <subject>Cost accounting</subject>
 <subject>Research and development contracts</subject>
 <subject>Contract costs</subject>
 <type>Letter Report</type>
 <seriesAbbrev>RCED</seriesAbbrev>
</extension>
<titleInfo>
 <title>University Research: Effect of Indirect Cost Revisions and Options for Future Changes</title>
</titleInfo>
<abstract>Pursuant to a legislative requirement, GAO reviewed the government&apos;s
regulations that allow universities to recover indirect costs associated
with federally funded research, focusing on the effects of the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) revisions that: (1) established a 26-percent
cap on federal reimbursements for universities&apos; administrative costs;
(2) further clarified and tightened certain indirect cost accounting
procedures; and (3) control indirect cost growth, improve the
consistency of cost treatments, and streamline indirect cost accounting
procedures.&lt;p/&gt;GAO found that: (1) the 26-percent administrative cost cap affected 69
to 82 of the 140 universities surveyed and reduced annual administrative
costs reimbursements by about $104 million; (2) the cap also lead to
more uniform indirect cost rates among the universities; (3) the 1991
revisions eliminated or reduced some previously allowable indirect
costs; (4) the effects of the 1993 revisions are not fully known because
federal agencies are implementing them through renegotiated multiyear
rate agreements; (5) the change in the treatment of tuition remission
costs could reduce the number of science and engineering doctoral
candidates at 4 universities; (6) OMB has proposed several revisions to
its indirect cost principles to control indirect cost growth and improve
accounting procedures; and (7) federal and university officials oppose a
total cap on indirect cost rates because it could adversely affect the
universities&apos; ability to provide modern laboratory facilities and
equipment.</abstract>
<location>
 <url displayLabel="HTML rendition" access="raw object">https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/GAOREPORTS-RCED-95-74/html/GAOREPORTS-RCED-95-74.htm</url>
 <url displayLabel="PDF rendition" access="raw object">https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/GAOREPORTS-RCED-95-74/pdf/GAOREPORTS-RCED-95-74.pdf</url>
</location>
<identifier type="preferred citation">GAO/RCED-95-74</identifier>
<location>
 <url displayLabel="Content Detail" access="object in context">https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/GAOREPORTS-RCED-95-74</url>
</location>
<note>Letter Report</note>
<extension>
 <searchTitle>GAO/RCED-95-74; University Research: Effect of Indirect Cost Revisions and Options for Future Changes;
            </searchTitle>
</extension>
<subject>
 <topic>Colleges/universities</topic>
 <topic>Research programs</topic>
 <topic>Administrative costs</topic>
 <topic>Overhead costs</topic>
 <topic>Accounting procedures</topic>
 <topic>Cost control</topic>
 <topic>Research and development costs</topic>
 <topic>Cost accounting</topic>
 <topic>Research and development contracts</topic>
 <topic>Contract costs</topic>
</subject>
</mods>