<mods xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3" version="3.3" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3 http://www.loc.gov/standards/mods/v3/mods-3-3.xsd" ID="P0b002ee1803908a7">
<name type="corporate">
 <namePart>United States Government Publishing Office</namePart>
 <role>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">publisher</roleTerm>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="code">pbl</roleTerm>
</role>
 <role>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">distributor</roleTerm>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="code">dst</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="corporate">
 <namePart>United States</namePart>
 <namePart>Government Accountability Office</namePart>
 <namePart>Resources, Community, and Economic Development Division</namePart>
 <role>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">author</roleTerm>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="code">aut</roleTerm>
</role>
 <description>Government Organization</description>
</name>
<typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource>
<genre authority="marcgt">government publication</genre>
<language>
 <languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm>
</language>
<extension>
 <collectionCode>GAOREPORTS</collectionCode>
 <category>Legislative Agency Publications</category>
 <waisDatabaseName>gao</waisDatabaseName>
 <branch>legislative</branch>
 <dateIngested>2010-08-12</dateIngested>
</extension>
<originInfo>
 <publisher>U.S. Government Printing Office</publisher>
 <dateIssued encoding="w3cdtf">1994-12-28</dateIssued>
 <issuance>monographic</issuance>
</originInfo>
<physicalDescription>
 <note type="source content type">deposited</note>
 <digitalOrigin>born digital</digitalOrigin>
 <extent>48 p.</extent>
</physicalDescription>
<classification authority="sudocs">GA 1.13:RCED-95-23</classification>
<identifier type="uri">https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/GAOREPORTS-RCED-95-23</identifier>
<identifier type="local">P0b002ee1803908a7</identifier>
<identifier type="former package identifier">f:rc95023</identifier>
<recordInfo>
 <recordContentSource authority="marcorg">DGPO</recordContentSource>
 <recordCreationDate encoding="w3cdtf">2010-08-12</recordCreationDate>
 <recordChangeDate encoding="w3cdtf">2011-03-28</recordChangeDate>
 <recordIdentifier source="DGPO">GAOREPORTS-RCED-95-23</recordIdentifier>
 <recordOrigin>machine generated</recordOrigin>
 <languageOfCataloging>
  <languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm>
</languageOfCataloging>
</recordInfo>
<accessCondition type="GPO scope determination">fdlp</accessCondition>
<extension>
 <docClass>REPORT</docClass>
 <accessId>GAOREPORTS-RCED-95-23</accessId>
 <reportNumber>RCED-95-23</reportNumber>
 <subject>Pesticides</subject>
 <subject>Pesticide regulation</subject>
 <subject>Toxic substances</subject>
 <subject>Health hazards</subject>
 <subject>Safety standards</subject>
 <subject>Safety regulation</subject>
 <subject>Interagency relations</subject>
 <subject>Food inspection</subject>
 <subject>Fishes</subject>
 <subject>Consumer protection</subject>
 <type>Other Written Product</type>
 <seriesAbbrev>RCED</seriesAbbrev>
</extension>
<titleInfo>
 <title>Pesticides: Reducing Exposure to Residues of Canceled Pesticides</title>
</titleInfo>
<abstract>Because the residues of most pesticides do not linger in the
environment, officials at the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)
believe that most marketed foods do not contain unsafe levels of
residues from canceled pesticides.  However, the residues of a few
long-canceled chlorinated pesticides continue to appear, especially in
fish.  An EPA study shows that for five canceled chlorinated pesticides,
consumers of some fish may be exposed, over a lifetime, to health risks
that exceed the agency&apos;s standard of negligible risk--under which the
risk of an additional case of cancer does not exceed one in one million.
EPA proposed lower action levels in 1991 for residues of the five
canceled pesticides, but the Food and Drug Administration believed that
EPA had not given enough weight to the residues&apos; unavoidability.
Although both agencies believe that the existing action levels should be
lowered, neither has taken further steps to do so.  EPA does not revoke
a pesticide&apos;s tolerances at the same time it cancels the pesticide&apos;s
registrations for food use. On average, the agency has taken more than
six years to revoke the tolerances for canceled pesticides.  The
establishment of procedures linking revocation to cancellation would
provide for more efficient revocation actions and would reduce the
possibility that consumers might eat imported foods containing residues
of pesticides that EPA no longer considers acceptable for use on food
crops.</abstract>
<location>
 <url displayLabel="HTML rendition" access="raw object">https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/GAOREPORTS-RCED-95-23/html/GAOREPORTS-RCED-95-23.htm</url>
 <url displayLabel="PDF rendition" access="raw object">https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/GAOREPORTS-RCED-95-23/pdf/GAOREPORTS-RCED-95-23.pdf</url>
</location>
<identifier type="preferred citation">GAO/RCED-95-23</identifier>
<location>
 <url displayLabel="Content Detail" access="object in context">https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/GAOREPORTS-RCED-95-23</url>
</location>
<note>Other Written Product</note>
<extension>
 <searchTitle>GAO/RCED-95-23; Pesticides: Reducing Exposure to Residues of Canceled Pesticides;
            </searchTitle>
</extension>
<subject>
 <topic>Pesticides</topic>
 <topic>Pesticide regulation</topic>
 <topic>Toxic substances</topic>
 <topic>Health hazards</topic>
 <topic>Safety standards</topic>
 <topic>Safety regulation</topic>
 <topic>Interagency relations</topic>
 <topic>Food inspection</topic>
 <topic>Fishes</topic>
 <topic>Consumer protection</topic>
</subject>
</mods>