<mods xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3" version="3.3" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3 http://www.loc.gov/standards/mods/v3/mods-3-3.xsd" ID="P0b002ee180379746">
<name type="corporate">
 <namePart>United States Government Publishing Office</namePart>
 <role>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">publisher</roleTerm>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="code">pbl</roleTerm>
</role>
 <role>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">distributor</roleTerm>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="code">dst</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="corporate">
 <namePart>United States</namePart>
 <namePart>Government Accountability Office</namePart>
 <namePart>Resources, Community, and Economic Development Division</namePart>
 <role>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">author</roleTerm>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="code">aut</roleTerm>
</role>
 <description>Government Organization</description>
</name>
<typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource>
<genre authority="marcgt">government publication</genre>
<language>
 <languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm>
</language>
<extension>
 <collectionCode>GAOREPORTS</collectionCode>
 <category>Legislative Agency Publications</category>
 <waisDatabaseName>gao</waisDatabaseName>
 <branch>legislative</branch>
 <dateIngested>2010-08-12</dateIngested>
</extension>
<originInfo>
 <publisher>U.S. Government Printing Office</publisher>
 <dateIssued encoding="w3cdtf">1995-06-20</dateIssued>
 <issuance>monographic</issuance>
</originInfo>
<physicalDescription>
 <note type="source content type">deposited</note>
 <digitalOrigin>born digital</digitalOrigin>
 <extent>27 p.</extent>
</physicalDescription>
<classification authority="sudocs">GA 1.13:RCED-95-195</classification>
<identifier type="uri">https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/GAOREPORTS-RCED-95-195</identifier>
<identifier type="local">P0b002ee180379746</identifier>
<identifier type="former package identifier">f:rc95195</identifier>
<recordInfo>
 <recordContentSource authority="marcorg">DGPO</recordContentSource>
 <recordCreationDate encoding="w3cdtf">2010-08-12</recordCreationDate>
 <recordChangeDate encoding="w3cdtf">2011-03-23</recordChangeDate>
 <recordIdentifier source="DGPO">GAOREPORTS-RCED-95-195</recordIdentifier>
 <recordOrigin>machine generated</recordOrigin>
 <languageOfCataloging>
  <languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm>
</languageOfCataloging>
</recordInfo>
<accessCondition type="GPO scope determination">fdlp</accessCondition>
<extension>
 <docClass>REPORT</docClass>
 <accessId>GAOREPORTS-RCED-95-195</accessId>
 <reportNumber>RCED-95-195</reportNumber>
 <subject>Housing programs</subject>
 <subject>Proposed legislation</subject>
 <subject>Public housing</subject>
 <subject>Federal aid for housing</subject>
 <subject>Rent policies</subject>
 <subject>Cost analysis</subject>
 <subject>Low income housing</subject>
 <subject>Fair market value</subject>
 <subject>Rent subsidies</subject>
 <identifier>American Community Partnerships Act</identifier>
 <identifier>Buffalo (NY)</identifier>
 <identifier>Los Angeles (CA)</identifier>
 <identifier>McDonough (GA)</identifier>
 <identifier>New York (NY)</identifier>
 <identifier>Alexandria (VA)</identifier>
 <type>Letter Report</type>
 <seriesAbbrev>RCED</seriesAbbrev>
</extension>
<titleInfo>
 <title>Public Housing: Converting to Housing Certificates Raises Major Questions About Cost</title>
</titleInfo>
<abstract>Pursuant to a congressional request, GAO reviewed the Department of
Housing and Urban Development&apos;s (HUD) legislative proposal to convert
its public housing program to a certificate program, focusing on: (1)
the cost implications of transitioning from the current public housing
program to a housing certificate program; and (2) key factors that may
affect HUD plans to provide greater housing choices for public housing
residents.&lt;p/&gt;GAO found that: (1) based on an analysis of average costs, HUD believes
that housing certificates will cost less than funding public housing
developments; (2) there are wide differences in the cost of the two
options at individual housing developments; (3) the certificate program
would cost less for developments in good shape, but for those housing
developments in the worst physical condition, direct funding is less
costly; (4) the variations in costs raise important issues, including
whether the federal government should pay for the rehabilitation of
public housing developments and the added costs of certificates, and
whether housing certificates should be targeted initially to
developments where they are clearly cost-effective; (5) HUD has not
performed the detailed analysis that is needed to provide information
for deciding these issues; and (6) factors that will influence
residents&apos; actual housing choices include the current tenants&apos;
characteristics, their inclination to move, the availability of
affordable housing, private landlords&apos; willingness to accept tenants
with housing certificates, and HUD compliance with and enforcement of
housing discrimination laws.</abstract>
<location>
 <url displayLabel="HTML rendition" access="raw object">https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/GAOREPORTS-RCED-95-195/html/GAOREPORTS-RCED-95-195.htm</url>
 <url displayLabel="PDF rendition" access="raw object">https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/GAOREPORTS-RCED-95-195/pdf/GAOREPORTS-RCED-95-195.pdf</url>
</location>
<identifier type="preferred citation">GAO/RCED-95-195</identifier>
<location>
 <url displayLabel="Content Detail" access="object in context">https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/GAOREPORTS-RCED-95-195</url>
</location>
<note>Letter Report</note>
<extension>
 <searchTitle>GAO/RCED-95-195; Public Housing: Converting to Housing Certificates Raises Major Questions About Cost;
            </searchTitle>
</extension>
<subject>
 <topic>Housing programs</topic>
 <topic>Proposed legislation</topic>
 <topic>Public housing</topic>
 <topic>Federal aid for housing</topic>
 <topic>Rent policies</topic>
 <topic>Cost analysis</topic>
 <topic>Low income housing</topic>
 <topic>Fair market value</topic>
 <topic>Rent subsidies</topic>
 <topic>American Community Partnerships Act</topic>
 <topic>Buffalo (NY)</topic>
 <topic>Los Angeles (CA)</topic>
 <topic>McDonough (GA)</topic>
 <topic>New York (NY)</topic>
 <topic>Alexandria (VA)</topic>
</subject>
</mods>