<mods xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3" version="3.3" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3 http://www.loc.gov/standards/mods/v3/mods-3-3.xsd" ID="P0b002ee18039424e">
<name type="corporate">
 <namePart>United States Government Publishing Office</namePart>
 <role>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">publisher</roleTerm>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="code">pbl</roleTerm>
</role>
 <role>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">distributor</roleTerm>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="code">dst</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="corporate">
 <namePart>United States</namePart>
 <namePart>Government Accountability Office</namePart>
 <namePart>Resources, Community, and Economic Development Division</namePart>
 <role>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">author</roleTerm>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="code">aut</roleTerm>
</role>
 <description>Government Organization</description>
</name>
<typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource>
<genre authority="marcgt">government publication</genre>
<language>
 <languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm>
</language>
<extension>
 <collectionCode>GAOREPORTS</collectionCode>
 <category>Legislative Agency Publications</category>
 <waisDatabaseName>gao</waisDatabaseName>
 <branch>legislative</branch>
 <dateIngested>2010-08-12</dateIngested>
</extension>
<originInfo>
 <publisher>U.S. Government Printing Office</publisher>
 <dateIssued encoding="w3cdtf">1994-05-23</dateIssued>
 <issuance>monographic</issuance>
</originInfo>
<physicalDescription>
 <note type="source content type">deposited</note>
 <digitalOrigin>born digital</digitalOrigin>
</physicalDescription>
<classification authority="sudocs">GA 1.13:RCED-94-35</classification>
<identifier type="uri">https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/GAOREPORTS-RCED-94-35</identifier>
<identifier type="local">P0b002ee18039424e</identifier>
<identifier type="former package identifier">f:rc94035</identifier>
<recordInfo>
 <recordContentSource authority="marcorg">DGPO</recordContentSource>
 <recordCreationDate encoding="w3cdtf">2010-08-12</recordCreationDate>
 <recordChangeDate encoding="w3cdtf">2011-03-28</recordChangeDate>
 <recordIdentifier source="DGPO">GAOREPORTS-RCED-94-35</recordIdentifier>
 <recordOrigin>machine generated</recordOrigin>
 <languageOfCataloging>
  <languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm>
</languageOfCataloging>
</recordInfo>
<accessCondition type="GPO scope determination">fdlp</accessCondition>
<extension>
 <docClass>REPORT</docClass>
 <accessId>GAOREPORTS-RCED-94-35</accessId>
 <reportNumber>RCED-94-35</reportNumber>
 <subject>Water resources development</subject>
 <subject>Water supply management</subject>
 <subject>Environmental law</subject>
 <subject>Environmental monitoring</subject>
 <subject>Environmental impact statements</subject>
 <subject>Water conservation</subject>
 <subject>Tanks (containers)</subject>
 <subject>Inland waterways</subject>
 <subject>Civil engineering</subject>
 <subject>Public works</subject>
 <identifier>Central Valley Project (CA)</identifier>
 <identifier>Arizona</identifier>
 <identifier>California</identifier>
 <identifier>Colorado</identifier>
 <identifier>Idaho</identifier>
 <identifier>Kansas</identifier>
 <identifier>Montana</identifier>
 <identifier>Nebraska</identifier>
 <identifier>Nevada</identifier>
 <identifier>New Mexico</identifier>
 <identifier>North Dakota</identifier>
 <identifier>Oklahoma</identifier>
 <identifier>Oregon</identifier>
 <identifier>South Dakota</identifier>
 <identifier>Texas</identifier>
 <identifier>Utah</identifier>
 <identifier>Washington</identifier>
 <identifier>Wyoming</identifier>
 <identifier>Colorado River Basin</identifier>
 <type>Chapter Report</type>
 <seriesAbbrev>RCED</seriesAbbrev>
</extension>
<titleInfo>
 <title>Water Transfers: More Efficient Water Use Possible, If Problems Are Addressed</title>
</titleInfo>
<abstract>Debates over how water from western federal water projects should be
used have become more heated in recent years. Farmers use more than 80
percent of the western water withdrawn for use. Environmental problems,
such as selenium contamination and salinity, have been linked to
agricultural irrigation. Moreover, as urban populations, tourism, and
environmental awareness continue to grow, the demand for water increases
for cities, recreation, and fish and wildlife habitats. Building dams to
meet new demand is often not an option because of their high price tags
and harmful environmental effects. Advocated by resource economists and
others, water markets, in which rights to use water are bought and sold,
would allocate water to its highest economic use by allowing those who
place the highest economic value on it to buy it. This report examines
(1) the costs and benefits of water transfers; (2) how water markets
might be structured to address the impacts on parties outside of
transfers; (3) the legal, institutional, and other issues that would
need to be addressed to implement a federal water market; and (4) how
transfers of water from federal projects could be coordinated with state
law.</abstract>
<location>
 <url displayLabel="HTML rendition" access="raw object">https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/GAOREPORTS-RCED-94-35/html/GAOREPORTS-RCED-94-35.htm</url>
</location>
<identifier type="preferred citation">GAO/RCED-94-35</identifier>
<location>
 <url displayLabel="Content Detail" access="object in context">https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/GAOREPORTS-RCED-94-35</url>
</location>
<note>Chapter Report</note>
<extension>
 <searchTitle>GAO/RCED-94-35; Water Transfers: More Efficient Water Use Possible, If Problems Are Addressed;
            </searchTitle>
</extension>
<subject>
 <topic>Water resources development</topic>
 <topic>Water supply management</topic>
 <topic>Environmental law</topic>
 <topic>Environmental monitoring</topic>
 <topic>Environmental impact statements</topic>
 <topic>Water conservation</topic>
 <topic>Tanks (containers)</topic>
 <topic>Inland waterways</topic>
 <topic>Civil engineering</topic>
 <topic>Public works</topic>
 <topic>Central Valley Project (CA)</topic>
 <topic>Arizona</topic>
 <topic>California</topic>
 <topic>Colorado</topic>
 <topic>Idaho</topic>
 <topic>Kansas</topic>
 <topic>Montana</topic>
 <topic>Nebraska</topic>
 <topic>Nevada</topic>
 <topic>New Mexico</topic>
 <topic>North Dakota</topic>
 <topic>Oklahoma</topic>
 <topic>Oregon</topic>
 <topic>South Dakota</topic>
 <topic>Texas</topic>
 <topic>Utah</topic>
 <topic>Washington</topic>
 <topic>Wyoming</topic>
 <topic>Colorado River Basin</topic>
</subject>
</mods>