<mods xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3" version="3.3" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3 http://www.loc.gov/standards/mods/v3/mods-3-3.xsd" ID="P0b002ee18039fb22">
<name type="corporate">
 <namePart>United States Government Publishing Office</namePart>
 <role>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">publisher</roleTerm>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="code">pbl</roleTerm>
</role>
 <role>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">distributor</roleTerm>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="code">dst</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="corporate">
 <namePart>United States</namePart>
 <namePart>Government Accountability Office</namePart>
 <namePart>Resources, Community, and Economic Development Division</namePart>
 <role>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">author</roleTerm>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="code">aut</roleTerm>
</role>
 <description>Government Organization</description>
</name>
<typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource>
<genre authority="marcgt">government publication</genre>
<language>
 <languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm>
</language>
<extension>
 <collectionCode>GAOREPORTS</collectionCode>
 <category>Legislative Agency Publications</category>
 <waisDatabaseName>gao</waisDatabaseName>
 <branch>legislative</branch>
 <dateIngested>2010-08-12</dateIngested>
</extension>
<originInfo>
 <publisher>U.S. Government Printing Office</publisher>
 <dateIssued encoding="w3cdtf">2000-04-28</dateIssued>
 <issuance>monographic</issuance>
</originInfo>
<physicalDescription>
 <note type="source content type">deposited</note>
 <digitalOrigin>born digital</digitalOrigin>
 <extent>50 p.</extent>
</physicalDescription>
<classification authority="sudocs">GA 1.13:RCED-00-96</classification>
<identifier type="uri">https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/GAOREPORTS-RCED-00-96</identifier>
<identifier type="local">P0b002ee18039fb22</identifier>
<identifier type="former package identifier">f:rc00096</identifier>
<recordInfo>
 <recordContentSource authority="marcorg">DGPO</recordContentSource>
 <recordCreationDate encoding="w3cdtf">2010-08-12</recordCreationDate>
 <recordChangeDate encoding="w3cdtf">2011-03-24</recordChangeDate>
 <recordIdentifier source="DGPO">GAOREPORTS-RCED-00-96</recordIdentifier>
 <recordOrigin>machine generated</recordOrigin>
 <languageOfCataloging>
  <languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm>
</languageOfCataloging>
</recordInfo>
<accessCondition type="GPO scope determination">fdlp</accessCondition>
<extension>
 <docClass>REPORT</docClass>
 <accessId>GAOREPORTS-RCED-00-96</accessId>
 <reportNumber>RCED-00-96</reportNumber>
 <subject>Nuclear waste management</subject>
 <subject>Radioactive waste disposal</subject>
 <subject>Radioactive pollution</subject>
 <subject>Strategic planning</subject>
 <subject>Occupational safety</subject>
 <subject>Obsolete facilities</subject>
 <subject>Industrial facilities</subject>
 <subject>Uranium</subject>
 <subject>Water pollution control</subject>
 <identifier>Paducah (KY)</identifier>
 <identifier>EPA National Priorities List</identifier>
 <type>Letter Report</type>
 <seriesAbbrev>RCED</seriesAbbrev>
</extension>
<titleInfo>
 <title>Nuclear Waste Cleanup: DOE&apos;s Paducah Plan Faces</title>
</titleInfo>
<abstract>Pursuant to a congressional request, GAO reviewed the Department of
Energy&apos;s (DOE) Paducah plant cleanup plan, focusing on: (1) the planned
activities, cost, and schedule DOE has for cleaning up the site; (2) the
challenges that exist in accomplishing the current cleanup plan; and (3)
whether the cleanup plan includes all areas at the site requiring
cleanup.&lt;p/&gt;GAO noted that: (1) DOE&apos;s plan for addressing the contamination at the
Paducah site focuses on six major cleanup categories; (2) four of these
address the physical contamination on the site: (a) groundwater; (b)
surface water; (c) soils; and (d) buried waste; (3) two other major
categories of cleanup work include treating and disposing of the
equivalent of about 52,000 barrels of waste stored on site and
decontaminating and removing two unused, contaminated uranium process
buildings; (4) the cleanup plan includes cost and schedule estimates for
characterizing the contamination in each cleanup category and for using
technologies to treat, remove, and dispose of the contamination; (5) the
current plan estimates the cost of completing the cleanup at $1.3
billion from fiscal years 2000 through 2010; (6) DOE faces many
challenges to completing its cleanup as planned; (7) uncertainties about
the extent, source, and nature of contamination yet to be cleaned up
could affect the cleanup plan; (8) DOE also faces several technical
risks, including the planned use of technologies that are unproven or
perhaps not well suited to the site&apos;s conditions; (9) also underpinning
the plan are assumptions that annual federal funding will increase to an
average of $124 million through 2010; (10) if the planned increase in
funding does not occur, the project could take longer to complete; (11)
these issues make it uncertain that DOE will be able to accomplish the
cleanup within its estimated timeframe and cost; (12) even when the
planned cleanup has been carried out, billions of dollars and many years
will be needed to address areas at the Paducah site that are not in the
cleanup plan; (13) four areas at the site that will need cleaning up
are: (a) large amounts of waste and scrap materials; (b) various unused
buildings and structures; (c) thousands of tons of depleted uranium; and
(d) the buildings and equipment that are now being used in the
enrichment process but that will have to be cleaned up when the plant
closes; (14) the additional materials, buildings, and structures are
excluded from the cleanup plan because they fall under the purview of a
different departmental program; and (15) according to the DOE official
responsible for these areas, they are not in the cleanup plan because
DOE is hesitant to transfer any more areas to the Office of
Environmental Management, which already has a large workload and limited
funding for cleanup.</abstract>
<location>
 <url displayLabel="HTML rendition" access="raw object">https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/GAOREPORTS-RCED-00-96/html/GAOREPORTS-RCED-00-96.htm</url>
 <url displayLabel="PDF rendition" access="raw object">https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/GAOREPORTS-RCED-00-96/pdf/GAOREPORTS-RCED-00-96.pdf</url>
</location>
<identifier type="preferred citation">GAO/RCED-00-96</identifier>
<location>
 <url displayLabel="Content Detail" access="object in context">https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/GAOREPORTS-RCED-00-96</url>
</location>
<note>Letter Report</note>
<extension>
 <searchTitle>GAO/RCED-00-96; Nuclear Waste Cleanup: DOE&apos;s Paducah Plan Faces;
            </searchTitle>
</extension>
<subject>
 <topic>Nuclear waste management</topic>
 <topic>Radioactive waste disposal</topic>
 <topic>Radioactive pollution</topic>
 <topic>Strategic planning</topic>
 <topic>Occupational safety</topic>
 <topic>Obsolete facilities</topic>
 <topic>Industrial facilities</topic>
 <topic>Uranium</topic>
 <topic>Water pollution control</topic>
 <topic>Paducah (KY)</topic>
 <topic>EPA National Priorities List</topic>
</subject>
</mods>