<mods xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3" version="3.3" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3 http://www.loc.gov/standards/mods/v3/mods-3-3.xsd" ID="P0b002ee18039a580">
<name type="corporate">
 <namePart>United States Government Publishing Office</namePart>
 <role>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">publisher</roleTerm>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="code">pbl</roleTerm>
</role>
 <role>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">distributor</roleTerm>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="code">dst</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="corporate">
 <namePart>United States</namePart>
 <namePart>Government Accountability Office</namePart>
 <namePart>Resources, Community, and Economic Development Division</namePart>
 <role>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">author</roleTerm>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="code">aut</roleTerm>
</role>
 <description>Government Organization</description>
</name>
<typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource>
<genre authority="marcgt">government publication</genre>
<language>
 <languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm>
</language>
<extension>
 <collectionCode>GAOREPORTS</collectionCode>
 <category>Legislative Agency Publications</category>
 <waisDatabaseName>gao</waisDatabaseName>
 <branch>legislative</branch>
 <dateIngested>2010-08-12</dateIngested>
</extension>
<originInfo>
 <publisher>U.S. Government Printing Office</publisher>
 <dateIssued encoding="w3cdtf">2000-06-28</dateIssued>
 <issuance>monographic</issuance>
</originInfo>
<physicalDescription>
 <note type="source content type">deposited</note>
 <digitalOrigin>born digital</digitalOrigin>
 <extent>50 p.</extent>
</physicalDescription>
<classification authority="sudocs">GA 1.13:RCED-00-75</classification>
<identifier type="uri">https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/GAOREPORTS-RCED-00-75</identifier>
<identifier type="local">P0b002ee18039a580</identifier>
<identifier type="former package identifier">f:rc00075</identifier>
<recordInfo>
 <recordContentSource authority="marcorg">DGPO</recordContentSource>
 <recordCreationDate encoding="w3cdtf">2010-08-12</recordCreationDate>
 <recordChangeDate encoding="w3cdtf">2011-03-28</recordChangeDate>
 <recordIdentifier source="DGPO">GAOREPORTS-RCED-00-75</recordIdentifier>
 <recordOrigin>machine generated</recordOrigin>
 <languageOfCataloging>
  <languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm>
</languageOfCataloging>
</recordInfo>
<accessCondition type="GPO scope determination">fdlp</accessCondition>
<extension>
 <docClass>REPORT</docClass>
 <accessId>GAOREPORTS-RCED-00-75</accessId>
 <reportNumber>RCED-00-75</reportNumber>
 <subject>Airline industry</subject>
 <subject>Airports</subject>
 <subject>Search and seizure</subject>
 <subject>Terrorism</subject>
 <subject>Baggage (personal effects)</subject>
 <subject>Transportation safety</subject>
 <subject>Performance measures</subject>
 <subject>Facility security</subject>
 <subject>Foreign governments</subject>
 <subject>Security services contracts</subject>
 <identifier>FAA Civil Aviation Security Program</identifier>
 <identifier>Belgium</identifier>
 <identifier>Canada</identifier>
 <identifier>France</identifier>
 <identifier>Netherlands</identifier>
 <identifier>United Kingdom</identifier>
 <identifier>FAA Air Carrier Standard Security Program</identifier>
 <type>Chapter Report</type>
 <seriesAbbrev>RCED</seriesAbbrev>
</extension>
<titleInfo>
 <title>Aviation Security: Long-Standing Problems Impair Airport</title>
</titleInfo>
<abstract>Pursuant to a congressional request, GAO reviewed the effectiveness of
screening checkpoints at airports, focusing on the: (1) causes of
screeners&apos; problems in detecting dangerous objects and the efforts of
the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) to address these problems; and
(2) screening practices of selected foreign countries and the potential
for using these practices to help improve screeners&apos; performance in the
United States.&lt;p/&gt;GAO noted that: (1) long-standing problems combine to reduce screeners&apos;
effectiveness in detecting dangerous objects, most notably: (a) the
rapid turnover of screener personnel--often above 100 percent a year at
large airports and, in at least one recent instance, above 400 percent a
year; and (b) human factors conditions that have for years affected
screeners&apos; hiring, training, and working environment; (2) a key factor
in the rapid turnover is the low wages screeners receive; (3) screeners
are often paid the minimum wage or close to it and can often earn more
at airport fast-food restaurants; (4) FAA is pursuing several
initiatives to improve the hiring, training, and testing of screeners,
to increase their alertness and more closely monitor their performance,
and to certify the security companies that air carriers retain to staff
screening checkpoints; (5) however, most of these efforts are behind
schedule; (6) FAA has established performance improvement goals for
screeners, but it has not: (a) completed an integrated plan to tie its
various efforts to improve screeners&apos; performance to the achievement of
its goals; and (b) adequately measured its progress in achieving its
goals for improving screeners&apos; performance; (7) passenger screening
procedures in the countries GAO visited are similar to those in the
United States; (8) passengers walk through metal detectors at airport
checkpoints and have their carry-on baggage scanned by X-ray machines or
physically searched by screeners; (9) but there are also some
differences; (10) for example, in most countries, screeners must undergo
more extensive training, screeners receive higher wages and better
benefits, and screening responsibility rests with the government or the
airport, not with the air carriers as it does in the United States; (11)
among the five countries GAO visited--Belgium, Canada, France, the
Netherlands, and the United Kingdom--the turnover rate for screeners was
lower--about 50 percent a year or less--and in a joint test conducted by
FAA and one of these countries, screeners&apos; performance was higher; (12)
however, the feasibility of applying these countries&apos; practices to
screening operations in the United States cannot be readily determined;
and (13) given the uncertainty and the fact that FAA has already begun
several efforts to improve screeners&apos; performance, GAO is not making
recommendations to revise current screening practices in the United
States.</abstract>
<location>
 <url displayLabel="HTML rendition" access="raw object">https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/GAOREPORTS-RCED-00-75/html/GAOREPORTS-RCED-00-75.htm</url>
 <url displayLabel="PDF rendition" access="raw object">https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/GAOREPORTS-RCED-00-75/pdf/GAOREPORTS-RCED-00-75.pdf</url>
</location>
<identifier type="preferred citation">GAO/RCED-00-75</identifier>
<location>
 <url displayLabel="Content Detail" access="object in context">https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/GAOREPORTS-RCED-00-75</url>
</location>
<note>Chapter Report</note>
<extension>
 <searchTitle>GAO/RCED-00-75; Aviation Security: Long-Standing Problems Impair Airport;
            </searchTitle>
</extension>
<subject>
 <topic>Airline industry</topic>
 <topic>Airports</topic>
 <topic>Search and seizure</topic>
 <topic>Terrorism</topic>
 <topic>Baggage (personal effects)</topic>
 <topic>Transportation safety</topic>
 <topic>Performance measures</topic>
 <topic>Facility security</topic>
 <topic>Foreign governments</topic>
 <topic>Security services contracts</topic>
 <topic>FAA Civil Aviation Security Program</topic>
 <topic>Belgium</topic>
 <topic>Canada</topic>
 <topic>France</topic>
 <topic>Netherlands</topic>
 <topic>United Kingdom</topic>
 <topic>FAA Air Carrier Standard Security Program</topic>
</subject>
</mods>