<mods xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3" version="3.3" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3 http://www.loc.gov/standards/mods/v3/mods-3-3.xsd" ID="P0b002ee1803a22b3">
<name type="corporate">
 <namePart>United States Government Publishing Office</namePart>
 <role>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">publisher</roleTerm>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="code">pbl</roleTerm>
</role>
 <role>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">distributor</roleTerm>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="code">dst</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="corporate">
 <namePart>United States</namePart>
 <namePart>Government Accountability Office</namePart>
 <namePart>Resources, Community, and Economic Development Division</namePart>
 <role>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">author</roleTerm>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="code">aut</roleTerm>
</role>
 <description>Government Organization</description>
</name>
<typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource>
<genre authority="marcgt">government publication</genre>
<language>
 <languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm>
</language>
<extension>
 <collectionCode>GAOREPORTS</collectionCode>
 <category>Legislative Agency Publications</category>
 <waisDatabaseName>gao</waisDatabaseName>
 <branch>legislative</branch>
 <dateIngested>2010-08-12</dateIngested>
</extension>
<originInfo>
 <publisher>U.S. Government Printing Office</publisher>
 <dateIssued encoding="w3cdtf">2000-01-31</dateIssued>
 <issuance>monographic</issuance>
</originInfo>
<physicalDescription>
 <note type="source content type">deposited</note>
 <digitalOrigin>born digital</digitalOrigin>
 <extent>18 p.</extent>
</physicalDescription>
<classification authority="sudocs">GA 1.13:RCED-00-68</classification>
<identifier type="uri">https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/GAOREPORTS-RCED-00-68</identifier>
<identifier type="local">P0b002ee1803a22b3</identifier>
<identifier type="former package identifier">f:rc00068</identifier>
<recordInfo>
 <recordContentSource authority="marcorg">DGPO</recordContentSource>
 <recordCreationDate encoding="w3cdtf">2010-08-12</recordCreationDate>
 <recordChangeDate encoding="w3cdtf">2011-03-28</recordChangeDate>
 <recordIdentifier source="DGPO">GAOREPORTS-RCED-00-68</recordIdentifier>
 <recordOrigin>machine generated</recordOrigin>
 <languageOfCataloging>
  <languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm>
</languageOfCataloging>
</recordInfo>
<accessCondition type="GPO scope determination">fdlp</accessCondition>
<extension>
 <docClass>REPORT</docClass>
 <accessId>GAOREPORTS-RCED-00-68</accessId>
 <reportNumber>RCED-00-68</reportNumber>
 <subject>Fraud</subject>
 <subject>Telecommunication industry</subject>
 <subject>Consumer protection</subject>
 <subject>Federal/state relations</subject>
 <subject>Telephone</subject>
 <subject>Commercial law</subject>
 <subject>Defective pricing</subject>
 <identifier>Internet</identifier>
 <type>Letter Report</type>
 <seriesAbbrev>RCED</seriesAbbrev>
</extension>
<titleInfo>
 <title>Telecommunications: Update on State-Level Cramming</title>
</titleInfo>
<abstract>Cramming is the inclusion of unauthorized, misleading, or deceptive
charges in consumers&apos; telephone bills. Phone companies can cram
consumers by adding unauthorized charges for telephone services, such as
call messaging. Cramming can also involve third-party vendors who offer
products and services that are unrelated to telephone services, such as
live or recorded information on the stock market, sports, or products;
chat lines and dating services; and Internet Web page design. The
Federal Communications Commission (FCC) and the Federal Trade Commission
(FTC) reported that cramming complaints declined during the first nine
months of 1999 compared with the same period during the previous year.
The situation at the state level, however, was mixed: 22 states and the
District of Columbia reported declines in cramming complaints, 15 states
reported increases, and 11 reported no changes. The states are
continuing their efforts to combat this abuse. For example, by the end
of 1998, most states had made information available to consumers on ways
to prevent cramming and had established administrative procedures for
resolving complaints about telephone billing. The states were also
taking additional enforcement actions against crammers. Between 1996 and
1998, 16 states completed 25 enforcement actions against companies and
individuals involving in cramming, resulting in more than $3.5 million
in restitution and fines.</abstract>
<location>
 <url displayLabel="HTML rendition" access="raw object">https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/GAOREPORTS-RCED-00-68/html/GAOREPORTS-RCED-00-68.htm</url>
 <url displayLabel="PDF rendition" access="raw object">https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/GAOREPORTS-RCED-00-68/pdf/GAOREPORTS-RCED-00-68.pdf</url>
</location>
<identifier type="preferred citation">GAO/RCED-00-68</identifier>
<location>
 <url displayLabel="Content Detail" access="object in context">https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/GAOREPORTS-RCED-00-68</url>
</location>
<note>Letter Report</note>
<extension>
 <searchTitle>GAO/RCED-00-68; Telecommunications: Update on State-Level Cramming;
            </searchTitle>
</extension>
<subject>
 <topic>Fraud</topic>
 <topic>Telecommunication industry</topic>
 <topic>Consumer protection</topic>
 <topic>Federal/state relations</topic>
 <topic>Telephone</topic>
 <topic>Commercial law</topic>
 <topic>Defective pricing</topic>
 <topic>Internet</topic>
</subject>
</mods>