<mods xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3" version="3.3" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3 http://www.loc.gov/standards/mods/v3/mods-3-3.xsd" ID="P0b002ee18038dad6">
<name type="corporate">
 <namePart>United States Government Publishing Office</namePart>
 <role>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">publisher</roleTerm>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="code">pbl</roleTerm>
</role>
 <role>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">distributor</roleTerm>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="code">dst</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="corporate">
 <namePart>United States</namePart>
 <namePart>Government Accountability Office</namePart>
 <namePart>Resources, Community, and Economic Development Division</namePart>
 <role>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">author</roleTerm>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="code">aut</roleTerm>
</role>
 <description>Government Organization</description>
</name>
<typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource>
<genre authority="marcgt">government publication</genre>
<language>
 <languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm>
</language>
<extension>
 <collectionCode>GAOREPORTS</collectionCode>
 <category>Legislative Agency Publications</category>
 <waisDatabaseName>gao</waisDatabaseName>
 <branch>legislative</branch>
 <dateIngested>2010-08-12</dateIngested>
</extension>
<originInfo>
 <publisher>U.S. Government Printing Office</publisher>
 <dateIssued encoding="w3cdtf">2000-02-24</dateIssued>
 <issuance>monographic</issuance>
</originInfo>
<physicalDescription>
 <note type="source content type">deposited</note>
 <digitalOrigin>born digital</digitalOrigin>
 <extent>32 p.</extent>
</physicalDescription>
<classification authority="sudocs">GA 1.13:RCED-00-62</classification>
<identifier type="uri">https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/GAOREPORTS-RCED-00-62</identifier>
<identifier type="local">P0b002ee18038dad6</identifier>
<identifier type="former package identifier">f:rc00062</identifier>
<recordInfo>
 <recordContentSource authority="marcorg">DGPO</recordContentSource>
 <recordCreationDate encoding="w3cdtf">2010-08-12</recordCreationDate>
 <recordChangeDate encoding="w3cdtf">2011-03-24</recordChangeDate>
 <recordIdentifier source="DGPO">GAOREPORTS-RCED-00-62</recordIdentifier>
 <recordOrigin>machine generated</recordOrigin>
 <languageOfCataloging>
  <languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm>
</languageOfCataloging>
</recordInfo>
<accessCondition type="GPO scope determination">fdlp</accessCondition>
<extension>
 <docClass>REPORT</docClass>
 <accessId>GAOREPORTS-RCED-00-62</accessId>
 <reportNumber>RCED-00-62</reportNumber>
 <subject>Nuclear weapons</subject>
 <subject>Nuclear facility security</subject>
 <subject>Nuclear facility safety</subject>
 <subject>Management information systems</subject>
 <subject>Internal controls</subject>
 <subject>Safety standards</subject>
 <subject>Performance measures</subject>
 <identifier>DOE Safeguards and Security Information Management System</identifier>
 <identifier>DOE Safeguards and Security Program</identifier>
 <identifier>DOE Nuclear Weapons Program</identifier>
 <type>Letter Report</type>
 <seriesAbbrev>RCED</seriesAbbrev>
</extension>
<titleInfo>
 <title>Nuclear Security: Improvements Needed in DOE&apos;s Safeguards</title>
</titleInfo>
<abstract>Pursuant to a congressional request, GAO reviewed the Department of
Energy&apos;s (DOE) oversight activities for nuclear laboratories&apos; safety and
security programs, focusing on: (1) the monitoring and tracking of
findings resulting from DOE&apos;s oversight activities; (2) the correction,
validation, and closing of findings resulting from such activities; and
(3) the consistency of various DOE assessments of the laboratories&apos;
safeguard and security programs.&lt;p/&gt;GAO noted that: (1) DOE&apos;s Office of Security and Emergency Operations
maintains a centralized management information system to track and
monitor safeguards and security findings and the related corrective
actions; (2) this system would be of more value if it contained
information on all security findings; (3) the findings developed from
1995-1998 by DOE&apos;s Office of Independent Oversight and Performance
Assurance (IOPA) are not included in the system nor are the findings and
recommendations developed by GAO and other outside organizations; (4)
the system is not directly accessible by safeguards and security staff
at DOE&apos;s area offices and the laboratories; (5) each laboratory has
developed its own information systems, which contain data on all the
findings that relate to it; (6) as a result, information about problems
at one location is not available to safeguards and security staff at
other locations; (7) DOE requires that the laboratories conduct a risk
assessment, a root cause analysis, and a cost-benefit analysis as part
of their process to correct safeguards and security problems found by
DOE&apos;s oversight activities; (8) these analyses help to ensure that
problems with safeguards and security are corrected in an economic and
efficient manner; (9) these assessments and analyses have not always
been conducted; (10) in the past, IOPA has generally not worked with the
laboratories to develop corrective plans for its safeguards and security
findings; (11) IOPA is not required to validate the corrective action,
verify that the problem was corrected, and certify that its findings
were closed and has not been formally involved in these activities; (12)
there was no assurance that the problem was understood, adequately
corrected, and closed; (13) during the past year, IOPA has worked with
the laboratories to develop corrective action plans and has conducted
follow-up reviews of its findings that are being corrected, validated,
verified, or closed by the operations offices; (14) IOPA still does not
become involved in validating and verifying corrective actions and
certifying that findings are closed; (15) from 1994-1999, the
laboratories&apos; safeguards and security performance has received many
inconsistent ratings from oversight and other DOE organizations; (16)
this inconsistency can send a mixed or erroneous message to safeguards
and security policy makers and managers; (17) this inconsistency results
partially from various organizations&apos; use of different criteria and the
timing of the rating; and (18) DOE has changed the rating criteria for
the safeguards and security contract performance rating for 2000, which
could decrease rating inconsistency in future years.</abstract>
<location>
 <url displayLabel="HTML rendition" access="raw object">https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/GAOREPORTS-RCED-00-62/html/GAOREPORTS-RCED-00-62.htm</url>
 <url displayLabel="PDF rendition" access="raw object">https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/GAOREPORTS-RCED-00-62/pdf/GAOREPORTS-RCED-00-62.pdf</url>
</location>
<identifier type="preferred citation">GAO/RCED-00-62</identifier>
<location>
 <url displayLabel="Content Detail" access="object in context">https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/GAOREPORTS-RCED-00-62</url>
</location>
<note>Letter Report</note>
<extension>
 <searchTitle>GAO/RCED-00-62; Nuclear Security: Improvements Needed in DOE&apos;s Safeguards;
            </searchTitle>
</extension>
<subject>
 <topic>Nuclear weapons</topic>
 <topic>Nuclear facility security</topic>
 <topic>Nuclear facility safety</topic>
 <topic>Management information systems</topic>
 <topic>Internal controls</topic>
 <topic>Safety standards</topic>
 <topic>Performance measures</topic>
 <topic>DOE Safeguards and Security Information Management System</topic>
 <topic>DOE Safeguards and Security Program</topic>
 <topic>DOE Nuclear Weapons Program</topic>
</subject>
</mods>