<mods xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3" version="3.3" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3 http://www.loc.gov/standards/mods/v3/mods-3-3.xsd" ID="P0b002ee1803a26fa">
<name type="corporate">
 <namePart>United States Government Publishing Office</namePart>
 <role>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">publisher</roleTerm>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="code">pbl</roleTerm>
</role>
 <role>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">distributor</roleTerm>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="code">dst</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="corporate">
 <namePart>United States</namePart>
 <namePart>Government Accountability Office</namePart>
 <namePart>Resources, Community, and Economic Development Division</namePart>
 <role>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">author</roleTerm>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="code">aut</roleTerm>
</role>
 <description>Government Organization</description>
</name>
<typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource>
<genre authority="marcgt">government publication</genre>
<language>
 <languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm>
</language>
<extension>
 <collectionCode>GAOREPORTS</collectionCode>
 <category>Legislative Agency Publications</category>
 <waisDatabaseName>gao</waisDatabaseName>
 <branch>legislative</branch>
 <dateIngested>2010-08-12</dateIngested>
</extension>
<originInfo>
 <publisher>U.S. Government Printing Office</publisher>
 <dateIssued encoding="w3cdtf">2000-03-07</dateIssued>
 <issuance>monographic</issuance>
</originInfo>
<physicalDescription>
 <note type="source content type">deposited</note>
 <digitalOrigin>born digital</digitalOrigin>
 <extent>24 p.</extent>
</physicalDescription>
<classification authority="sudocs">GA 1.13:RCED-00-61</classification>
<identifier type="uri">https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/GAOREPORTS-RCED-00-61</identifier>
<identifier type="local">P0b002ee1803a26fa</identifier>
<identifier type="former package identifier">f:rc00061</identifier>
<recordInfo>
 <recordContentSource authority="marcorg">DGPO</recordContentSource>
 <recordCreationDate encoding="w3cdtf">2010-08-12</recordCreationDate>
 <recordChangeDate encoding="w3cdtf">2011-03-23</recordChangeDate>
 <recordIdentifier source="DGPO">GAOREPORTS-RCED-00-61</recordIdentifier>
 <recordOrigin>machine generated</recordOrigin>
 <languageOfCataloging>
  <languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm>
</languageOfCataloging>
</recordInfo>
<accessCondition type="GPO scope determination">fdlp</accessCondition>
<extension>
 <docClass>REPORT</docClass>
 <accessId>GAOREPORTS-RCED-00-61</accessId>
 <reportNumber>RCED-00-61</reportNumber>
 <subject>Food relief programs</subject>
 <subject>Computer matching</subject>
 <subject>State-administered programs</subject>
 <subject>Fraud</subject>
 <subject>Program abuses</subject>
 <subject>Welfare recipients</subject>
 <subject>Welfare benefits</subject>
 <subject>Internal controls</subject>
 <subject>Data bases</subject>
 <subject>Federal/state relations</subject>
 <identifier>USDA Electronic Benefit Transfer System</identifier>
 <identifier>Food Stamp Program</identifier>
 <identifier>Florida</identifier>
 <identifier>Missouri</identifier>
 <identifier>South Carolina</identifier>
 <identifier>Texas</identifier>
 <identifier>Maryland</identifier>
 <type>Letter Report</type>
 <seriesAbbrev>RCED</seriesAbbrev>
</extension>
<titleInfo>
 <title>Food Stamp Program: Better Use of Electronic Data Could</title>
</titleInfo>
<abstract>Pursuant to a congressional request, GAO reviewed the efforts of states
and the Food and Nutrition Service (FNS) to reduce Food Stamp
trafficking, focusing on the: (1) extent to which the states with
statewide electronic benefit transfer (EBT) systems are identifying and
disqualifying recipients who engage in trafficking; and (2) actions FNS
has taken to encourage the states to identify and disqualify recipients
engaged in trafficking.&lt;p/&gt;GAO noted that: (1) of the 29 states with statewide EBT systems, only
4--Florida, Missouri, South Carolina, and Texas--independently and
proactively analyzed their electronic databases to identify suspect
recipients; (2) a fifth state--Maryland--has used a list of suspected
traffickers provided by the Department of Agriculture&apos;s Office of
Inspector General since 1994 to provide a basis for follow-up
investigations; (3) all five of these states invested the resources
necessary to investigate suspect recipients, but, for fiscal years 1998
and 1999, only two states--Maryland and Texas--were responsible for
about 87 percent of the 6,873 individuals disqualified nationwide from
the Food Stamp Program for trafficking benefits; (4) in addition to
these five states, nine others investigated suspect
recipients--identified primarily by FNS--and disqualified those who
engaged in trafficking, albeit to a lesser extent; (5) the remaining 15
of the 29 states did not disqualify any recipient for trafficking during
the 2-year period; (6) EBT data have been available since 1993 to
analyze and identify trafficking patterns; (7) however, since only five
states had statewide EBT systems before 1997, FNS has only recently
initiated action to work with the states to ensure that they target
recipients likely to be engaged in trafficking--those identified by FNS
in its successful cases against storeowners found to have engaged in
trafficking; (8) in July 1999, FNS directed its seven regional offices
to develop plans to work with the states to identify suspect recipients,
investigate the suspects, and to disqualify those engaged in
trafficking; (9) as of December 1999, these plans were still in the
preliminary stages; (10) FNS will not be able to determine the
effectiveness of its recent efforts in reducing the overall level of
trafficking because it lacks a current, reliable estimate of the extent
of trafficking; (11) such an estimate would also better permit FNS to
adhere to the principles of the Government Performance and Results Act
of 1993, which state that goals and strategies should be quantifiable
and measurable; and (12) FNS could use EBT data to develop such
estimates and to target its available resources.</abstract>
<location>
 <url displayLabel="HTML rendition" access="raw object">https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/GAOREPORTS-RCED-00-61/html/GAOREPORTS-RCED-00-61.htm</url>
 <url displayLabel="PDF rendition" access="raw object">https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/GAOREPORTS-RCED-00-61/pdf/GAOREPORTS-RCED-00-61.pdf</url>
</location>
<identifier type="preferred citation">GAO/RCED-00-61</identifier>
<location>
 <url displayLabel="Content Detail" access="object in context">https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/GAOREPORTS-RCED-00-61</url>
</location>
<note>Letter Report</note>
<extension>
 <searchTitle>GAO/RCED-00-61; Food Stamp Program: Better Use of Electronic Data Could;
            </searchTitle>
</extension>
<subject>
 <topic>Food relief programs</topic>
 <topic>Computer matching</topic>
 <topic>State-administered programs</topic>
 <topic>Fraud</topic>
 <topic>Program abuses</topic>
 <topic>Welfare recipients</topic>
 <topic>Welfare benefits</topic>
 <topic>Internal controls</topic>
 <topic>Data bases</topic>
 <topic>Federal/state relations</topic>
 <topic>USDA Electronic Benefit Transfer System</topic>
 <topic>Food Stamp Program</topic>
 <topic>Florida</topic>
 <topic>Missouri</topic>
 <topic>South Carolina</topic>
 <topic>Texas</topic>
 <topic>Maryland</topic>
</subject>
</mods>