<mods xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3" version="3.3" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3 http://www.loc.gov/standards/mods/v3/mods-3-3.xsd" ID="P0b002ee180373ab5">
<name type="corporate">
 <namePart>United States Government Publishing Office</namePart>
 <role>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">publisher</roleTerm>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="code">pbl</roleTerm>
</role>
 <role>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">distributor</roleTerm>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="code">dst</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="corporate">
 <namePart>United States</namePart>
 <namePart>Government Accountability Office</namePart>
 <namePart>Resources, Community, and Economic Development Division</namePart>
 <role>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">author</roleTerm>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="code">aut</roleTerm>
</role>
 <description>Government Organization</description>
</name>
<typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource>
<genre authority="marcgt">government publication</genre>
<language>
 <languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm>
</language>
<extension>
 <collectionCode>GAOREPORTS</collectionCode>
 <category>Legislative Agency Publications</category>
 <waisDatabaseName>gao</waisDatabaseName>
 <branch>legislative</branch>
 <dateIngested>2010-08-12</dateIngested>
</extension>
<originInfo>
 <publisher>U.S. Government Printing Office</publisher>
 <dateIssued encoding="w3cdtf">1999-10-20</dateIssued>
 <issuance>monographic</issuance>
</originInfo>
<physicalDescription>
 <note type="source content type">deposited</note>
 <digitalOrigin>born digital</digitalOrigin>
 <extent>19 p.</extent>
</physicalDescription>
<classification authority="sudocs">GA 1.13:RCED-00-5</classification>
<identifier type="uri">https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/GAOREPORTS-RCED-00-5</identifier>
<identifier type="local">P0b002ee180373ab5</identifier>
<identifier type="former package identifier">f:rc00005</identifier>
<recordInfo>
 <recordContentSource authority="marcorg">DGPO</recordContentSource>
 <recordCreationDate encoding="w3cdtf">2010-08-12</recordCreationDate>
 <recordChangeDate encoding="w3cdtf">2011-03-24</recordChangeDate>
 <recordIdentifier source="DGPO">GAOREPORTS-RCED-00-5</recordIdentifier>
 <recordOrigin>machine generated</recordOrigin>
 <languageOfCataloging>
  <languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm>
</languageOfCataloging>
</recordInfo>
<accessCondition type="GPO scope determination">fdlp</accessCondition>
<extension>
 <docClass>REPORT</docClass>
 <accessId>GAOREPORTS-RCED-00-5</accessId>
 <reportNumber>RCED-00-5</reportNumber>
 <subject>Food relief programs</subject>
 <subject>Disadvantaged persons</subject>
 <subject>Eligibility determinations</subject>
 <subject>Eligibility criteria</subject>
 <subject>Labor surplus areas</subject>
 <subject>Waivers</subject>
 <subject>State-administered programs</subject>
 <subject>Federal/state relations</subject>
 <subject>Workfare</subject>
 <subject>Unemployment rates</subject>
 <identifier>Food Stamp Program</identifier>
 <type>Letter Report</type>
 <seriesAbbrev>RCED</seriesAbbrev>
</extension>
<titleInfo>
 <title>Food Stamp Program: How States Are Using Federal Waivers</title>
</titleInfo>
<abstract>Pursuant to a congressional request, GAO provided information on the
Food Stamp Program, focusing on: (1) the measures used by the Department
of Agriculture (USDA) to assess states&apos; requests for waivers to the work
requirement for able-bodied adults without dependents; (2) how states
have used the waiver provision; and (3) whether USDA and states
considered the availability of employment in adjacent areas when
deciding which areas to include in a waiver.&lt;p/&gt;GAO noted that: (1) USDA uses federal and state data to assess
employment conditions when reviewing states&apos; requests to waive the
requirement that able-bodied adults without dependents work in order to
remain eligible for food stamps; (2) consistent with welfare reform law,
states must show that the areas where the individuals live have
unemployment rates above 10 percent or do not have sufficient numbers of
jobs to provide employment for these individuals; (3) USDA has generally
granted waivers if the states&apos; requests were supported by data from the
Department of Labor showing that areas either had unemployment rates
above 10 percent or were designated as labor surplus areas, meaning that
the numbers of jobs there were not sufficient; (4) USDA has provided
states with guidance for other measures of employment conditions and has
accepted data from states showing, among other things, worsening
employment-to-population ratios or meager job growth to demonstrate that
areas do not have sufficient numbers of jobs; (5) as of June 1999, 38
states and the District of Columbia had USDA waivers in place, whereas
12 states had chosen not to seek them; (6) the 13 states GAO reviewed in
detail differed in their waiver policies as well; (7) of the 10 states
reviewed that implemented waivers, 8 had sought waivers for all eligible
areas, while 2 had sought waivers for only some eligible areas; (8)
California determined that in most areas that might qualify for waivers,
enough options existed for food stamp recipients to meet the work
requirement; (9) hence, the state sought a waiver only for two
agricultural areas that had suffered economically disastrous freezes;
(10) the three remaining states GAO reviewed had decided not to seek
waivers; (11) officials in those states said that all able-bodied adults
without dependents should meet the work requirement and that if they
fail to do so, their food stamp benefits should be terminated; (12) USDA
does not consider the availability of employment in adjacent areas when
assessing states&apos; waiver requests because the law does not require it to
do so; (13) of the 10 states GAO reviewed that have implemented waivers,
9 did not consider employment options in adjoining areas; (14) the
exception was California, where local officials decided not to seek
waivers for Indian reservations with severe unemployment if jobs were
available in nearby towns; and (15) California officials said that
employment in adjacent areas would generally not be a viable option,
mainly because of transportation difficulties.</abstract>
<location>
 <url displayLabel="HTML rendition" access="raw object">https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/GAOREPORTS-RCED-00-5/html/GAOREPORTS-RCED-00-5.htm</url>
 <url displayLabel="PDF rendition" access="raw object">https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/GAOREPORTS-RCED-00-5/pdf/GAOREPORTS-RCED-00-5.pdf</url>
</location>
<identifier type="preferred citation">GAO/RCED-00-5</identifier>
<location>
 <url displayLabel="Content Detail" access="object in context">https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/GAOREPORTS-RCED-00-5</url>
</location>
<note>Letter Report</note>
<extension>
 <searchTitle>GAO/RCED-00-5; Food Stamp Program: How States Are Using Federal Waivers;
            </searchTitle>
</extension>
<subject>
 <topic>Food relief programs</topic>
 <topic>Disadvantaged persons</topic>
 <topic>Eligibility determinations</topic>
 <topic>Eligibility criteria</topic>
 <topic>Labor surplus areas</topic>
 <topic>Waivers</topic>
 <topic>State-administered programs</topic>
 <topic>Federal/state relations</topic>
 <topic>Workfare</topic>
 <topic>Unemployment rates</topic>
 <topic>Food Stamp Program</topic>
</subject>
</mods>