<mods xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3" version="3.3" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3 http://www.loc.gov/standards/mods/v3/mods-3-3.xsd" ID="P0b002ee1803a0a8a">
<name type="corporate">
 <namePart>United States Government Publishing Office</namePart>
 <role>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">publisher</roleTerm>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="code">pbl</roleTerm>
</role>
 <role>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">distributor</roleTerm>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="code">dst</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="corporate">
 <namePart>United States</namePart>
 <namePart>Government Accountability Office</namePart>
 <namePart>Resources, Community, and Economic Development Division</namePart>
 <role>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">author</roleTerm>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="code">aut</roleTerm>
</role>
 <description>Government Organization</description>
</name>
<typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource>
<genre authority="marcgt">government publication</genre>
<language>
 <languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm>
</language>
<extension>
 <collectionCode>GAOREPORTS</collectionCode>
 <category>Legislative Agency Publications</category>
 <waisDatabaseName>gao</waisDatabaseName>
 <branch>legislative</branch>
 <dateIngested>2010-08-12</dateIngested>
</extension>
<originInfo>
 <publisher>U.S. Government Printing Office</publisher>
 <dateIssued encoding="w3cdtf">2000-09-29</dateIssued>
 <issuance>monographic</issuance>
</originInfo>
<physicalDescription>
 <note type="source content type">deposited</note>
 <digitalOrigin>born digital</digitalOrigin>
 <extent>30 p.</extent>
</physicalDescription>
<classification authority="sudocs">GA 1.13:RCED-00-256</classification>
<identifier type="uri">https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/GAOREPORTS-RCED-00-256</identifier>
<identifier type="local">P0b002ee1803a0a8a</identifier>
<identifier type="former package identifier">f:rc00256</identifier>
<recordInfo>
 <recordContentSource authority="marcorg">DGPO</recordContentSource>
 <recordCreationDate encoding="w3cdtf">2010-08-12</recordCreationDate>
 <recordChangeDate encoding="w3cdtf">2011-03-24</recordChangeDate>
 <recordIdentifier source="DGPO">GAOREPORTS-RCED-00-256</recordIdentifier>
 <recordOrigin>machine generated</recordOrigin>
 <languageOfCataloging>
  <languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm>
</languageOfCataloging>
</recordInfo>
<accessCondition type="GPO scope determination">fdlp</accessCondition>
<extension>
 <docClass>REPORT</docClass>
 <accessId>GAOREPORTS-RCED-00-256</accessId>
 <reportNumber>RCED-00-256</reportNumber>
 <subject>Agency missions</subject>
 <subject>Strategic planning</subject>
 <subject>Performance measures</subject>
 <subject>National forests</subject>
 <subject>Forest management</subject>
 <subject>Accountability</subject>
 <identifier>USDA National Forest System</identifier>
 <identifier>National Park System</identifier>
 <type>Letter Report</type>
 <seriesAbbrev>RCED</seriesAbbrev>
</extension>
<titleInfo>
 <title>Forest Service: Proposed Regulations Adequately Address</title>
</titleInfo>
<abstract>Pursuant to a congressional request, GAO reviewed the Forest Service&apos;s
forest plan, focusing on the extent to which the Forest Service&apos;s
proposed regulations: (1) make clear the agency&apos;s mission priorities
before beginning the process of revising a forest plan; (2) link forest
plans to agencywide goals, objectives, and strategies; and (3) hold the
forests more accountable for key elements of forest planning.&lt;p/&gt;GAO noted that: (1) a lack of clear direction on how to resolve
conflicts among competing uses on national forest lands has contributed
significantly to inefficiency and waste in the Forest Service&apos;s
development and implementation of forest plans; (2) to address this
deficiency, the agency&apos;s 1999 proposed planning regulations would make
ecological sustainability, rather than economic or social
sustainability, the agency&apos;s top priority, in order to provide a
sustainable flow of products, services, and other values from national
forests; (3) elevating the maintenance or restoration of ecological
systems over other uses on the national forests is consistent with the
agency&apos;s evolving mission, which now favors resource protection over
production; (4) however, the priority assigned to ecological
sustainability is not driven by the statutory authorities specific to
the management of the national forests; (5) rather, it has evolved over
many years, responding, in part, to the requirements in environmental
laws and their implementing regulations and judicial interpretations;
(6) as a result, Congress has never explicitly accepted ecological
sustainability as the Forest Service&apos;s highest priority or acknowledged
its effects on the availability of timber, recreation, and other goods
and services on the national forests; (7) the Forest Service has made
some progress in developing goals, objectives, and strategies that help
translate its priorities into on-the-ground projects and activities; (8)
the agency is refining its goals and objectives to better focus on
outcomes and results to be achieved over time; (9) it is also developing
a strategy to reduce the incidence of uncontrollable and often
catastrophic wildfires; (10) yet, even though many of these goals,
objectives, and strategies are to be implemented through on-the-ground
projects and activities governed by individual forest plans, the
agency&apos;s proposed planning regulations do not require that these forest
plans be clearly linked to the goals, objectives, and strategies; (11)
in developing and implementing forest plans, national forests have not
always: (a) based their decisions on accurate and complete data; (b)
adequately involved the public and other government agencies throughout
the forest planning process; or (c) lived up to monitoring requirements,
particularly those for monitoring the effects of past planning
decisions; and (12) this has resulted in legal challenges to the plans
and limited the implementation of efforts to expedite the planning
process.</abstract>
<location>
 <url displayLabel="HTML rendition" access="raw object">https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/GAOREPORTS-RCED-00-256/html/GAOREPORTS-RCED-00-256.htm</url>
 <url displayLabel="PDF rendition" access="raw object">https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/GAOREPORTS-RCED-00-256/pdf/GAOREPORTS-RCED-00-256.pdf</url>
</location>
<identifier type="preferred citation">GAO/RCED-00-256</identifier>
<location>
 <url displayLabel="Content Detail" access="object in context">https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/GAOREPORTS-RCED-00-256</url>
</location>
<note>Letter Report</note>
<extension>
 <searchTitle>GAO/RCED-00-256; Forest Service: Proposed Regulations Adequately Address;
            </searchTitle>
</extension>
<subject>
 <topic>Agency missions</topic>
 <topic>Strategic planning</topic>
 <topic>Performance measures</topic>
 <topic>National forests</topic>
 <topic>Forest management</topic>
 <topic>Accountability</topic>
 <topic>USDA National Forest System</topic>
 <topic>National Park System</topic>
</subject>
</mods>