<mods xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3" version="3.3" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3 http://www.loc.gov/standards/mods/v3/mods-3-3.xsd" ID="P0b002ee180388712">
<name type="corporate">
 <namePart>United States Government Publishing Office</namePart>
 <role>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">publisher</roleTerm>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="code">pbl</roleTerm>
</role>
 <role>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">distributor</roleTerm>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="code">dst</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="corporate">
 <namePart>United States</namePart>
 <namePart>Government Accountability Office</namePart>
 <namePart>Resources, Community, and Economic Development Division</namePart>
 <role>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">author</roleTerm>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="code">aut</roleTerm>
</role>
 <description>Government Organization</description>
</name>
<typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource>
<genre authority="marcgt">government publication</genre>
<language>
 <languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm>
</language>
<extension>
 <collectionCode>GAOREPORTS</collectionCode>
 <category>Legislative Agency Publications</category>
 <waisDatabaseName>gao</waisDatabaseName>
 <branch>legislative</branch>
 <dateIngested>2010-08-12</dateIngested>
</extension>
<originInfo>
 <publisher>U.S. Government Printing Office</publisher>
 <dateIssued encoding="w3cdtf">2000-08-31</dateIssued>
 <issuance>monographic</issuance>
</originInfo>
<physicalDescription>
 <note type="source content type">deposited</note>
 <digitalOrigin>born digital</digitalOrigin>
 <extent>56 p.</extent>
</physicalDescription>
<classification authority="sudocs">GA 1.13:RCED-00-237</classification>
<identifier type="uri">https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/GAOREPORTS-RCED-00-237</identifier>
<identifier type="local">P0b002ee180388712</identifier>
<identifier type="former package identifier">f:rc00237</identifier>
<recordInfo>
 <recordContentSource authority="marcorg">DGPO</recordContentSource>
 <recordCreationDate encoding="w3cdtf">2010-08-12</recordCreationDate>
 <recordChangeDate encoding="w3cdtf">2011-03-28</recordChangeDate>
 <recordIdentifier source="DGPO">GAOREPORTS-RCED-00-237</recordIdentifier>
 <recordOrigin>machine generated</recordOrigin>
 <languageOfCataloging>
  <languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm>
</languageOfCataloging>
</recordInfo>
<accessCondition type="GPO scope determination">fdlp</accessCondition>
<extension>
 <docClass>REPORT</docClass>
 <accessId>GAOREPORTS-RCED-00-237</accessId>
 <reportNumber>RCED-00-237</reportNumber>
 <subject>Telecommunication industry</subject>
 <subject>Customer service</subject>
 <subject>Telephone</subject>
 <subject>Telecommunication</subject>
 <identifier>FCC Automated Reporting Management Information System</identifier>
 <identifier>Internet</identifier>
 <type>Other Written Product</type>
 <seriesAbbrev>RCED</seriesAbbrev>
 <USCode title="47">
                      <section number="214"></section>
                </USCode>
</extension>
<titleInfo>
 <title>Telecommunications: Issues Related to Local Telephone</title>
</titleInfo>
<abstract>Pursuant to a congressional request, GAO provided information on
developments in the local telephone service market, focusing on the: (1)
number of rural access lines that have been sold since the
Telecommunications Act&apos;s passage by large incumbent local exchange
carriers (ILEC); (2) development of digital subscriber line (DSL)
technology and the basis for variations in its rate of deployment; and
(3) quality of local telephone service, as indicated by customer
complaints and customer survey data reported to the Federal
Communications Commission (FCC) by the major ILECs.&lt;p/&gt;GAO noted that: (1) of the nearly 832,000 access lines sold by major
ILECs from January 1996 through April 2000, an estimated 68 percent were
in rural areas, according to state utility commission officials; (2) the
estimated 562,000 rural access lines sold represented only 2 percent of
the major ILECs&apos; total rural access lines in 1999; (3) after a steady
annual decline in sales of access lines from 1997 through 1999, the
first 4 months of 2000 saw a dramatic increase in sales, particularly in
rural areas; (4) in fact, the number of rural access lines sold from
January through April 2000 already exceeds the total number of rural
lines sold during the previous 4 years; (5) the sharp increase in rural
sales appears to be continuing; (6) GTE and US WEST have sales pending
with state utility commissions or FCC involving a total of over 870,000
additional rural access lines; (7) according to GTE and US WEST
officials, their companies made business decisions to sell access lines
at several times in the past; (8) FCC, on the other hand, believes that
most of the delay is the result of the negotiation process between the
ILEC and potential purchasers, rather than the state and federal
approval processes; (9) DSL technology was initially developed in the
late 1980s and tested in the early 1990s as a means for providing video
services over the telephone network; (10) in the mid-1990s, as the
Internet began to surge in popularity, technical trials were conducted
by several telephone companies to assess the feasibility of using the
asymmetric form of DSL (ADSL) for high-speed Internet access; (11)
although the commercial availability of ADSL did not begin for nearly 10
years after its development, telephone companies have rapidly deployed
DSL over the past 3 years; (12) ILECs intensified their ADSL deployment
in response to both the ADSL deployment by competitive local exchange
carriers, and the cable industry&apos;s foray into Internet access with cable
modem service; (13) a number of communications industry officials and
some industry experts told GAO that ADSL deployment did not occur sooner
because the ILECs were concerned about potential harm to revenues
generated by other existing high-speed telephone services, and because
of the unproven nature of the technology; and (14) several ILEC
officials told GAO that ADSL was not deployed sooner because trials of
ADSL for delivery of video services had been unsuccessful, the
technology had various technical limitations, and federal regulations
that had been issued for ADSL lines serve as a disincentive to its more
rapid deployment.</abstract>
<location>
 <url displayLabel="HTML rendition" access="raw object">https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/GAOREPORTS-RCED-00-237/html/GAOREPORTS-RCED-00-237.htm</url>
 <url displayLabel="PDF rendition" access="raw object">https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/GAOREPORTS-RCED-00-237/pdf/GAOREPORTS-RCED-00-237.pdf</url>
</location>
<identifier type="preferred citation">GAO/RCED-00-237</identifier>
<location>
 <url displayLabel="Content Detail" access="object in context">https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/GAOREPORTS-RCED-00-237</url>
</location>
<note>Other Written Product</note>
<extension>
 <searchTitle>GAO/RCED-00-237; Telecommunications: Issues Related to Local Telephone;
            </searchTitle>
</extension>
<subject>
 <topic>Telecommunication industry</topic>
 <topic>Customer service</topic>
 <topic>Telephone</topic>
 <topic>Telecommunication</topic>
 <topic>FCC Automated Reporting Management Information System</topic>
 <topic>Internet</topic>
</subject>
<relatedItem type="isReferencedBy">
 <titleInfo>
  <title>United States Code</title>
  <partNumber>Title 47 Section 214</partNumber>
</titleInfo>
 <identifier type="USC citation">47 U.S.C. 214</identifier>
</relatedItem>
</mods>