<mods xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3" version="3.3" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3 http://www.loc.gov/standards/mods/v3/mods-3-3.xsd" ID="P0b002ee18039fe28">
<name type="corporate">
 <namePart>United States Government Publishing Office</namePart>
 <role>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">publisher</roleTerm>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="code">pbl</roleTerm>
</role>
 <role>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">distributor</roleTerm>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="code">dst</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="corporate">
 <namePart>United States</namePart>
 <namePart>Government Accountability Office</namePart>
 <namePart>Resources, Community, and Economic Development Division</namePart>
 <role>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">author</roleTerm>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="code">aut</roleTerm>
</role>
 <description>Government Organization</description>
</name>
<typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource>
<genre authority="marcgt">government publication</genre>
<language>
 <languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm>
</language>
<extension>
 <collectionCode>GAOREPORTS</collectionCode>
 <category>Legislative Agency Publications</category>
 <waisDatabaseName>gao</waisDatabaseName>
 <branch>legislative</branch>
 <dateIngested>2010-08-12</dateIngested>
</extension>
<originInfo>
 <publisher>U.S. Government Printing Office</publisher>
 <dateIssued encoding="w3cdtf">2000-06-21</dateIssued>
 <issuance>monographic</issuance>
</originInfo>
<physicalDescription>
 <note type="source content type">deposited</note>
 <digitalOrigin>born digital</digitalOrigin>
 <extent>47 p.</extent>
</physicalDescription>
<classification authority="sudocs">GA 1.13:RCED-00-206R</classification>
<identifier type="uri">https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/GAOREPORTS-RCED-00-206R</identifier>
<identifier type="local">P0b002ee18039fe28</identifier>
<identifier type="former package identifier">f:rc00206r</identifier>
<recordInfo>
 <recordContentSource authority="marcorg">DGPO</recordContentSource>
 <recordCreationDate encoding="w3cdtf">2010-08-12</recordCreationDate>
 <recordChangeDate encoding="w3cdtf">2011-03-28</recordChangeDate>
 <recordIdentifier source="DGPO">GAOREPORTS-RCED-00-206R</recordIdentifier>
 <recordOrigin>machine generated</recordOrigin>
 <languageOfCataloging>
  <languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm>
</languageOfCataloging>
</recordInfo>
<accessCondition type="GPO scope determination">fdlp</accessCondition>
<extension>
 <docClass>REPORT</docClass>
 <accessId>GAOREPORTS-RCED-00-206R</accessId>
 <reportNumber>RCED-00-206R</reportNumber>
 <subject>Water quality</subject>
 <subject>Water pollution control</subject>
 <subject>Environmental policies</subject>
 <subject>Proposed legislation</subject>
 <subject>Agency proceedings</subject>
 <subject>Economic analysis</subject>
 <subject>Noncompliance</subject>
 <subject>Wildlife conservation</subject>
 <subject>Environmental legislation</subject>
 <identifier>EPA Total Maximum Daily Loads Program</identifier>
 <identifier>EPA National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System</identifier>
 <type>Correspondence</type>
 <seriesAbbrev>RCED</seriesAbbrev>
 <accountNo>Y1999</accountNo>
 <USCode title="2">
                      <section number="1531"></section>
                </USCode>
 <USCode title="5">
                      <section number="601"></section>
                </USCode>
</extension>
<titleInfo>
 <title>Clean Water Act: Proposed Revisions to EPA Regulations to</title>
</titleInfo>
<abstract>Pursuant to a congressional request, GAO reviewed the economic and
compliance issues associated with two proposed Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA) regulations to clean up polluted waters, focusing on: (1)
the reasonableness of EPA&apos;s economic analyses for the two proposed
regulations; and (2) whether EPA&apos;s determinations under the Unfunded
Mandated Reform Act of 1995 and the Regulatory Flexibility Act were
adequately supported.&lt;p/&gt;GAO noted that: (1) there were limitations with EPA&apos;s economic analyses
of the proposed regulations for the total maximum daily load (TMDL) and
the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) programs
that raise questions about their reasonableness and about the
determinations that EPA has based on them; (2) the outcomes of the
analyses were heavily influenced by a number of key assumptions; (3) in
the case of the TMDL program, for example, EPA assumed that states are
essentially in full compliance with current regulations, or will be as a
result of existing statutory and regulatory requirements; (4) EPA
estimated only the costs that would result from the new requirements in
the proposed regulations; (5) however, compliance with existing TMDL
regulations has been problematic, and future compliance in the absence
of the proposed regulation is uncertain; (6) GAO found similar
uncertainties with key &quot;baseline&quot; assumptions that affect the cost
estimates associated with the proposed NPDES regulation; (7) the key
water quality data available to EPA to identify the number of waters not
meeting standards and the number of TMDLs that will be needed are
incomplete, inconsistently collected by states, and sometimes based on
outdated and unconfirmed sources; (8) as a result of these limitations,
EPA&apos;s cost estimates are subject to substantial uncertainty; (9) EPA
provided little information on the benefits associated with the proposed
regulations; (10) without information on both costs and benefits, it is
difficult to confirm that the regulation is economically justified; (11)
given the uncertainties surrounding EPA&apos;s cost estimates, GAO disagrees
with EPA that EPA&apos;s analyses adequately supported its determination
under the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 that more detailed
analyses of costs, benefits, and alternatives were not needed for either
of the proposed regulations; (12) however, in the case of requirements
for additional analyses under the Regulatory Flexibility Act, case law
supports EPA&apos;s determination that because its proposed revisions to both
regulations do not directly regulate small entities, additional analyses
were not required; (13) several court decisions have ruled in analogous
situations that agencies&apos; regulations were not subject to the
Flexibility Act&apos;s requirements for additional analysis; and (14) courts
have held that where a proposed regulation does not impose any
regulatory requirements at all on any entities, but instead expands
agency authority to take future discretionary action, no initial
regulatory flexibility analysis is required.</abstract>
<location>
 <url displayLabel="HTML rendition" access="raw object">https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/GAOREPORTS-RCED-00-206R/html/GAOREPORTS-RCED-00-206R.htm</url>
 <url displayLabel="PDF rendition" access="raw object">https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/GAOREPORTS-RCED-00-206R/pdf/GAOREPORTS-RCED-00-206R.pdf</url>
</location>
<identifier type="preferred citation">GAO/RCED-00-206R</identifier>
<location>
 <url displayLabel="Content Detail" access="object in context">https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/GAOREPORTS-RCED-00-206R</url>
</location>
<note>Correspondence</note>
<extension>
 <searchTitle>GAO/RCED-00-206R; Clean Water Act: Proposed Revisions to EPA Regulations to;
            </searchTitle>
</extension>
<subject>
 <topic>Water quality</topic>
 <topic>Water pollution control</topic>
 <topic>Environmental policies</topic>
 <topic>Proposed legislation</topic>
 <topic>Agency proceedings</topic>
 <topic>Economic analysis</topic>
 <topic>Noncompliance</topic>
 <topic>Wildlife conservation</topic>
 <topic>Environmental legislation</topic>
 <topic>EPA Total Maximum Daily Loads Program</topic>
 <topic>EPA National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System</topic>
</subject>
<relatedItem type="isReferencedBy">
 <titleInfo>
  <title>United States Code</title>
  <partNumber>Title 2 Section 1531</partNumber>
</titleInfo>
 <identifier type="USC citation">2 U.S.C. 1531</identifier>
</relatedItem>
<relatedItem type="isReferencedBy">
 <titleInfo>
  <title>United States Code</title>
  <partNumber>Title 5 Section 601</partNumber>
</titleInfo>
 <identifier type="USC citation">5 U.S.C. 601</identifier>
</relatedItem>
</mods>