<mods xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3" version="3.3" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3 http://www.loc.gov/standards/mods/v3/mods-3-3.xsd" ID="P0b002ee18039d1c8">
<name type="corporate">
 <namePart>United States Government Publishing Office</namePart>
 <role>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">publisher</roleTerm>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="code">pbl</roleTerm>
</role>
 <role>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">distributor</roleTerm>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="code">dst</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="corporate">
 <namePart>United States</namePart>
 <namePart>Government Accountability Office</namePart>
 <namePart>Resources, Community, and Economic Development Division</namePart>
 <role>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">author</roleTerm>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="code">aut</roleTerm>
</role>
 <description>Government Organization</description>
</name>
<typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource>
<genre authority="marcgt">government publication</genre>
<language>
 <languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm>
</language>
<extension>
 <collectionCode>GAOREPORTS</collectionCode>
 <category>Legislative Agency Publications</category>
 <waisDatabaseName>gao</waisDatabaseName>
 <branch>legislative</branch>
 <dateIngested>2010-08-12</dateIngested>
</extension>
<originInfo>
 <publisher>U.S. Government Printing Office</publisher>
 <dateIssued encoding="w3cdtf">2000-07-11</dateIssued>
 <issuance>monographic</issuance>
</originInfo>
<physicalDescription>
 <note type="source content type">deposited</note>
 <digitalOrigin>born digital</digitalOrigin>
 <extent>41 p.</extent>
</physicalDescription>
<classification authority="sudocs">GA 1.13:RCED-00-192</classification>
<identifier type="uri">https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/GAOREPORTS-RCED-00-192</identifier>
<identifier type="local">P0b002ee18039d1c8</identifier>
<identifier type="former package identifier">f:rc00192</identifier>
<recordInfo>
 <recordContentSource authority="marcorg">DGPO</recordContentSource>
 <recordCreationDate encoding="w3cdtf">2010-08-12</recordCreationDate>
 <recordChangeDate encoding="w3cdtf">2011-03-23</recordChangeDate>
 <recordIdentifier source="DGPO">GAOREPORTS-RCED-00-192</recordIdentifier>
 <recordOrigin>machine generated</recordOrigin>
 <languageOfCataloging>
  <languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm>
</languageOfCataloging>
</recordInfo>
<accessCondition type="GPO scope determination">fdlp</accessCondition>
<extension>
 <docClass>REPORT</docClass>
 <accessId>GAOREPORTS-RCED-00-192</accessId>
 <reportNumber>RCED-00-192</reportNumber>
 <subject>Investigations by federal agencies</subject>
 <subject>Safety standards</subject>
 <subject>Hazardous substances</subject>
 <subject>Procurement regulations</subject>
 <subject>Industrial accidents</subject>
 <subject>Accident prevention</subject>
 <subject>Contract oversight</subject>
 <subject>Public administration</subject>
 <subject>Strategic planning</subject>
 <subject>Agency missions</subject>
 <type>Letter Report</type>
 <seriesAbbrev>RCED</seriesAbbrev>
 <USCode title="42">
                      <section detail="(r)(6)" number="7412"></section>
                </USCode>
</extension>
<titleInfo>
 <title>Chemical Safety Board: Improved Policies and Additional</title>
</titleInfo>
<abstract>Pursuant to a congressional request, GAO reviewed the Chemical Safety
and Hazard Investigation Board&apos;s management problems, focusing on: (1)
the status of the Board&apos;s organization and operations; (2) the Board&apos;s
efforts to update and develop plans, policies, and procedures for
accomplishing the Board&apos;s mission, including those aimed at ensuring the
objectivity of its investigative activities; and (3) whether the Board
would benefit from the independent oversight of an inspector general.&lt;p/&gt;GAO noted that: (1) since January 2000, the Board has been operating
under a new organizational structure based on shared decision-making,
which was not in effect during most of its first 2 years of operation;
(2) continuing disagreements between three of the Board members and the
former Chairman raise questions concerning the Board&apos;s future
productivity and effectiveness; (3) in terms of operations, the Board
has made only limited progress in addressing the investigative backlog
that developed after its first year, and it has not initiated a new
investigation since March 1999; (4) however, the realigned Board
established eight priorities for the balance of fiscal year 2000 that
support its primary investigative mission, including the completion of
three investigative reports; (5) the Board has made some progress in
developing needed plans, policies, and procedures to guide its
activities; (6) for example, the Board issued formal written procedures
for awarding and managing contracts in December 1999; (7) however, these
policies were not in place when most of the Board&apos;s larger contracts
($100,000 or more) were executed, and Board officials have identified a
number of contracting activities that appear to have provided limited
benefit to the agency; (8) furthermore, the Board is revising its
interim criteria for selecting incidents to investigate as well as its
investigative protocol and is developing a strategic plan to both meet
statutory requirements and update its business plan; (9) the Board plans
to have these plans and guides completed by September 2000; (10) the
Board&apos;s interim investigative protocol does not include needed policies
and procedures that would help ensure objectivity and balance in its
investigative work, such as those covering conflicts of interest; (11)
the operational problems that the Board has experienced in its 2-1/2
years of existence--including governance and management conflicts,
contracting expenditures of limited value, and the lack of basic
operating policies and procedures--suggest that ongoing institutional
oversight would be beneficial; and (12) while the Board could develop an
in-house audit function or contract out for evaluations, GAO believes an
option that offers the best potential for effective oversight would be
for the Board to obtain the services of an existing office of inspector
general.</abstract>
<location>
 <url displayLabel="HTML rendition" access="raw object">https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/GAOREPORTS-RCED-00-192/html/GAOREPORTS-RCED-00-192.htm</url>
 <url displayLabel="PDF rendition" access="raw object">https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/GAOREPORTS-RCED-00-192/pdf/GAOREPORTS-RCED-00-192.pdf</url>
</location>
<identifier type="preferred citation">GAO/RCED-00-192</identifier>
<location>
 <url displayLabel="Content Detail" access="object in context">https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/GAOREPORTS-RCED-00-192</url>
</location>
<note>Letter Report</note>
<extension>
 <searchTitle>GAO/RCED-00-192; Chemical Safety Board: Improved Policies and Additional;
            </searchTitle>
</extension>
<subject>
 <topic>Investigations by federal agencies</topic>
 <topic>Safety standards</topic>
 <topic>Hazardous substances</topic>
 <topic>Procurement regulations</topic>
 <topic>Industrial accidents</topic>
 <topic>Accident prevention</topic>
 <topic>Contract oversight</topic>
 <topic>Public administration</topic>
 <topic>Strategic planning</topic>
 <topic>Agency missions</topic>
</subject>
<relatedItem type="isReferencedBy">
 <titleInfo>
  <title>United States Code</title>
  <partNumber>Title 42 Section 7412(r)(6)</partNumber>
</titleInfo>
 <identifier type="USC citation">42 U.S.C. 7412(r)(6)</identifier>
</relatedItem>
</mods>