<mods xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3" version="3.3" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3 http://www.loc.gov/standards/mods/v3/mods-3-3.xsd" ID="P0b002ee180371fe0">
<name type="corporate">
 <namePart>United States Government Publishing Office</namePart>
 <role>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">publisher</roleTerm>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="code">pbl</roleTerm>
</role>
 <role>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">distributor</roleTerm>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="code">dst</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="corporate">
 <namePart>United States</namePart>
 <namePart>Government Accountability Office</namePart>
 <namePart>Resources, Community, and Economic Development Division</namePart>
 <role>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">author</roleTerm>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="code">aut</roleTerm>
</role>
 <description>Government Organization</description>
</name>
<typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource>
<genre authority="marcgt">government publication</genre>
<language>
 <languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm>
</language>
<extension>
 <collectionCode>GAOREPORTS</collectionCode>
 <category>Legislative Agency Publications</category>
 <waisDatabaseName>gao</waisDatabaseName>
 <branch>legislative</branch>
 <dateIngested>2010-08-12</dateIngested>
</extension>
<originInfo>
 <publisher>U.S. Government Printing Office</publisher>
 <dateIssued encoding="w3cdtf">1999-12-14</dateIssued>
 <issuance>monographic</issuance>
</originInfo>
<physicalDescription>
 <note type="source content type">deposited</note>
 <digitalOrigin>born digital</digitalOrigin>
 <extent>51 p.</extent>
</physicalDescription>
<classification authority="sudocs">GA 1.13:RCED-00-18</classification>
<identifier type="uri">https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/GAOREPORTS-RCED-00-18</identifier>
<identifier type="local">P0b002ee180371fe0</identifier>
<identifier type="former package identifier">f:rc00018</identifier>
<recordInfo>
 <recordContentSource authority="marcorg">DGPO</recordContentSource>
 <recordCreationDate encoding="w3cdtf">2010-08-12</recordCreationDate>
 <recordChangeDate encoding="w3cdtf">2011-03-23</recordChangeDate>
 <recordIdentifier source="DGPO">GAOREPORTS-RCED-00-18</recordIdentifier>
 <recordOrigin>machine generated</recordOrigin>
 <languageOfCataloging>
  <languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm>
</languageOfCataloging>
</recordInfo>
<accessCondition type="GPO scope determination">fdlp</accessCondition>
<extension>
 <docClass>REPORT</docClass>
 <accessId>GAOREPORTS-RCED-00-18</accessId>
 <reportNumber>RCED-00-18</reportNumber>
 <subject>Cost analysis</subject>
 <subject>Transportation research</subject>
 <subject>Motor vehicle pollution control</subject>
 <subject>Environmental policies</subject>
 <subject>Mass transit operations</subject>
 <subject>Urban transportation operations</subject>
 <subject>Natural gas</subject>
 <subject>Air pollution control</subject>
 <subject>Equipment maintenance</subject>
 <identifier>DOE Alternative Fuels Program</identifier>
 <identifier>DOE Bus Alternative Fuel Transportation Program</identifier>
 <identifier>FTA Advanced Technology Transit Bus Program</identifier>
 <type>Letter Report</type>
 <seriesAbbrev>RCED</seriesAbbrev>
</extension>
<titleInfo>
 <title>Mass Transit: Use of Alternative Fuels in Transit Buses</title>
</titleInfo>
<abstract>Pursuant to a legislative requirement, GAO reported on the: (1) status
of the development and use of alternative fuel technologies in transit
buses, particularly the use of compressed natural gas (CNG) as a fuel;
(2) air quality benefits of such technologies; (3) costs incurred by
transit operators to use CNG buses, as well as other alternative fuels,
compared with the costs to use diesel buses; and (4) primary incentives
and disincentives for using these technologies.&lt;p/&gt;GAO noted that: (1) alternative fuel buses account for a very small, but
growing, portion of the nation&apos;s transit bus fleet; (2) in 1997, 5
percent of the nation&apos;s approximately 50,000 transit buses operated on
some alternative fuel system; (3) the most commonly used alternative to
diesel fuel is CNG accounting for an estimated 75 percent of the
full-sized alternative fuel transit buses in 1998; (4) transit operators
are also beginning to test and demonstrate new propulsion system
technologies in their transit buses; (5) hybrid electric transit buses
are available, and fuel cell buses will be commercially available by
2002; (6) data are limited on the extent to which alternative fuel
transit buses provide air quality benefits in urban areas; (7) on a
national scale, transit buses do not significantly affect air pollution
levels because, according to the Department of Transportation, they
constitute only about 0.02 percent of the approximately 208 million
automobiles, trucks, and other vehicles in the United States; (8)
however, because individual alternative fuel transit buses emit less
pollution than do individual diesel buses, alternative fuel buses have
some beneficial effect on the air quality of the urban areas in which
they operate; (9) transit operators pay more to buy, maintain, and
operate CNG buses than they pay for diesel buses; (10) operators that
buy CNG buses typically pay approximately 15 to 25 percent more for each
of these buses than they do for diesel buses; (11) the costs of
installing fueling facilities and upgrading maintenance garages for CNG
buses vary among transit operators; (12) however, constructing a
compressed natural gas fueling station typically costs about $1.7
million, and modifying a maintenance facility typically costs about
$600,000; (13) six of the eight transit providers GAO spoke with were
able to provide operating cost estimates reporting higher operating
costs, higher maintenance costs and higher fuel costs for their CGN
buses than for their diesel buses; (14) transit operators approach the
decision, of whether switch to alternative fuels by considering a range
of factors, such as adhering to more stringent emission standards and
the public&apos;s concerns about transit bus pollution; (15) factors such as
the increased costs and reduced reliability of alternative fuel buses
experienced to date discourage the use of fuels other than diesel; and
(16) diesel buses have become significantly cleaner over the past 11
years, thereby reducing the environmental advantages of shifting to
alternative fuel buses.</abstract>
<location>
 <url displayLabel="HTML rendition" access="raw object">https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/GAOREPORTS-RCED-00-18/html/GAOREPORTS-RCED-00-18.htm</url>
 <url displayLabel="PDF rendition" access="raw object">https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/GAOREPORTS-RCED-00-18/pdf/GAOREPORTS-RCED-00-18.pdf</url>
</location>
<identifier type="preferred citation">GAO/RCED-00-18</identifier>
<location>
 <url displayLabel="Content Detail" access="object in context">https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/GAOREPORTS-RCED-00-18</url>
</location>
<note>Letter Report</note>
<extension>
 <searchTitle>GAO/RCED-00-18; Mass Transit: Use of Alternative Fuels in Transit Buses;
            </searchTitle>
</extension>
<subject>
 <topic>Cost analysis</topic>
 <topic>Transportation research</topic>
 <topic>Motor vehicle pollution control</topic>
 <topic>Environmental policies</topic>
 <topic>Mass transit operations</topic>
 <topic>Urban transportation operations</topic>
 <topic>Natural gas</topic>
 <topic>Air pollution control</topic>
 <topic>Equipment maintenance</topic>
 <topic>DOE Alternative Fuels Program</topic>
 <topic>DOE Bus Alternative Fuel Transportation Program</topic>
 <topic>FTA Advanced Technology Transit Bus Program</topic>
</subject>
</mods>