<mods xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3" version="3.3" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3 http://www.loc.gov/standards/mods/v3/mods-3-3.xsd" ID="P0b002ee1803843b0">
<name type="corporate">
 <namePart>United States Government Publishing Office</namePart>
 <role>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">publisher</roleTerm>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="code">pbl</roleTerm>
</role>
 <role>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">distributor</roleTerm>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="code">dst</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="corporate">
 <namePart>United States</namePart>
 <namePart>Government Accountability Office</namePart>
 <namePart>Resources, Community, and Economic Development Division</namePart>
 <role>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">author</roleTerm>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="code">aut</roleTerm>
</role>
 <description>Government Organization</description>
</name>
<typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource>
<genre authority="marcgt">government publication</genre>
<language>
 <languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm>
</language>
<extension>
 <collectionCode>GAOREPORTS</collectionCode>
 <category>Legislative Agency Publications</category>
 <waisDatabaseName>gao</waisDatabaseName>
 <branch>legislative</branch>
 <dateIngested>2010-08-12</dateIngested>
</extension>
<originInfo>
 <publisher>U.S. Government Printing Office</publisher>
 <dateIssued encoding="w3cdtf">2000-06-01</dateIssued>
 <issuance>monographic</issuance>
</originInfo>
<physicalDescription>
 <note type="source content type">deposited</note>
 <digitalOrigin>born digital</digitalOrigin>
 <extent>76 p.</extent>
</physicalDescription>
<classification authority="sudocs">GA 1.13:RCED-00-108</classification>
<identifier type="uri">https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/GAOREPORTS-RCED-00-108</identifier>
<identifier type="local">P0b002ee1803843b0</identifier>
<identifier type="former package identifier">f:rc00108</identifier>
<recordInfo>
 <recordContentSource authority="marcorg">DGPO</recordContentSource>
 <recordCreationDate encoding="w3cdtf">2010-08-12</recordCreationDate>
 <recordChangeDate encoding="w3cdtf">2011-03-28</recordChangeDate>
 <recordIdentifier source="DGPO">GAOREPORTS-RCED-00-108</recordIdentifier>
 <recordOrigin>machine generated</recordOrigin>
 <languageOfCataloging>
  <languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm>
</languageOfCataloging>
</recordInfo>
<accessCondition type="GPO scope determination">fdlp</accessCondition>
<extension>
 <docClass>REPORT</docClass>
 <accessId>GAOREPORTS-RCED-00-108</accessId>
 <reportNumber>RCED-00-108</reportNumber>
 <subject>Environmental law</subject>
 <subject>Performance measures</subject>
 <subject>Pollution control</subject>
 <subject>Law enforcement</subject>
 <subject>State-administered programs</subject>
 <subject>Environmental policies</subject>
 <subject>Noncompliance</subject>
 <subject>Federal/state relations</subject>
 <subject>Industrial pollution</subject>
 <subject>Program evaluation</subject>
 <identifier>EPA Denver Regional Oversight System</identifier>
 <identifier>EPA National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System</identifier>
 <type>Chapter Report</type>
 <seriesAbbrev>RCED</seriesAbbrev>
</extension>
<titleInfo>
 <title>Environmental Protection: More Consistency Needed Among</title>
</titleInfo>
<abstract>Pursuant to a congressional request, GAO provided information on the
consistency of the Environmental Protection Agency&apos;s (EPA) regional
offices&apos; enforcement of environmental requirements, focusing on: (1) the
extent to which variations exist among EPA&apos;s regional offices in the
actions they take to enforce environmental requirements; (2) what
factors contribute to any variations; and (3) what EPA is doing to
achieve consistency in regional enforcement activities.&lt;p/&gt;GAO noted that: (1) variations exist among EPA&apos;s regional offices in the
actions they take to enforce environmental requirements, as illustrated
by a number of key indicators that EPA headquarters enforcement
officials have used to monitor regional performance; (2) GAO also found
variations in regions&apos; overall strategies in overseeing the states
within their jurisdiction, which may result in more in-depth reviews in
some regional programs than in others; (3) EPA headquarters enforcement
officials emphasize that the data, by themselves, do not offer the
appropriate context to help determine the extent to which the variations
pose problems; (4) the officials note, however, that the data are useful
for identifying general trends and possible strengths and weaknesses in
regional and state programs, along with potential issues to investigate
at greater length; (5) also corroborating the variation it identified
among regional enforcement activities, GAO found broad agreement in its
interviews with EPA and state enforcement officials on key factors that
contribute to such variations; (6) among the factors most commonly cited
by these officials are: (a) differences in the philosophical approaches
among enforcement staff about how to best achieve compliance with
environmental requirements; (b) differences in state laws and
enforcement authorities, and in the manner in which regions respond to
these differences; (c) variations in resources available to both state
and regional enforcement offices; (d) the flexibility afforded by EPA
policies and guidance that allow states a degree of latitude in their
enforcement programs; and (e) incomplete and inadequate enforcement data
which hamper EPA&apos;s ability to accurately characterize the extent of
variations; (7) EPA headquarters and regional enforcement officials have
a number of efforts underway to help achieve greater consistency in
regional enforcement activities; (8) at the headquarters level,
enforcement officials are developing performance information that will
allow for comparisons among both regions and states in their conduct of
key enforcement responsibilities; (9) a number of EPA regional offices
have also sought to ensure more consistency in their state oversight by
developing and applying new audit protocols in their state reviews and
by encouraging more effective communication between and among regional
and state enforcement staff; and (10) however, a number of factors will
continue to challenge EPA&apos;s ability to ensure consistent regional
enforcement, including the absence of reliable data on how both states
and regions are performing their enforcement responsibilities.</abstract>
<location>
 <url displayLabel="HTML rendition" access="raw object">https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/GAOREPORTS-RCED-00-108/html/GAOREPORTS-RCED-00-108.htm</url>
 <url displayLabel="PDF rendition" access="raw object">https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/GAOREPORTS-RCED-00-108/pdf/GAOREPORTS-RCED-00-108.pdf</url>
</location>
<identifier type="preferred citation">GAO/RCED-00-108</identifier>
<location>
 <url displayLabel="Content Detail" access="object in context">https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/GAOREPORTS-RCED-00-108</url>
</location>
<note>Chapter Report</note>
<extension>
 <searchTitle>GAO/RCED-00-108; Environmental Protection: More Consistency Needed Among;
            </searchTitle>
</extension>
<subject>
 <topic>Environmental law</topic>
 <topic>Performance measures</topic>
 <topic>Pollution control</topic>
 <topic>Law enforcement</topic>
 <topic>State-administered programs</topic>
 <topic>Environmental policies</topic>
 <topic>Noncompliance</topic>
 <topic>Federal/state relations</topic>
 <topic>Industrial pollution</topic>
 <topic>Program evaluation</topic>
 <topic>EPA Denver Regional Oversight System</topic>
 <topic>EPA National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System</topic>
</subject>
</mods>