<mods xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3" version="3.3" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3 http://www.loc.gov/standards/mods/v3/mods-3-3.xsd" ID="P0b002ee180395937">
<name type="corporate">
 <namePart>United States Government Publishing Office</namePart>
 <role>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">publisher</roleTerm>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="code">pbl</roleTerm>
</role>
 <role>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">distributor</roleTerm>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="code">dst</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="corporate">
 <namePart>United States</namePart>
 <namePart>Government Accountability Office</namePart>
 <namePart>Resources, Community, and Economic Development Division</namePart>
 <role>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">author</roleTerm>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="code">aut</roleTerm>
</role>
 <description>Government Organization</description>
</name>
<typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource>
<genre authority="marcgt">government publication</genre>
<language>
 <languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm>
</language>
<extension>
 <collectionCode>GAOREPORTS</collectionCode>
 <category>Legislative Agency Publications</category>
 <waisDatabaseName>gao</waisDatabaseName>
 <branch>legislative</branch>
 <dateIngested>2010-08-12</dateIngested>
</extension>
<originInfo>
 <publisher>U.S. Government Printing Office</publisher>
 <dateIssued encoding="w3cdtf">2000-04-28</dateIssued>
 <issuance>monographic</issuance>
</originInfo>
<physicalDescription>
 <note type="source content type">deposited</note>
 <digitalOrigin>born digital</digitalOrigin>
 <extent>38 p.</extent>
</physicalDescription>
<classification authority="sudocs">GA 1.13:RCED-00-106</classification>
<identifier type="uri">https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/GAOREPORTS-RCED-00-106</identifier>
<identifier type="local">P0b002ee180395937</identifier>
<identifier type="former package identifier">f:rc00106</identifier>
<recordInfo>
 <recordContentSource authority="marcorg">DGPO</recordContentSource>
 <recordCreationDate encoding="w3cdtf">2010-08-12</recordCreationDate>
 <recordChangeDate encoding="w3cdtf">2011-03-24</recordChangeDate>
 <recordIdentifier source="DGPO">GAOREPORTS-RCED-00-106</recordIdentifier>
 <recordOrigin>machine generated</recordOrigin>
 <languageOfCataloging>
  <languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm>
</languageOfCataloging>
</recordInfo>
<accessCondition type="GPO scope determination">fdlp</accessCondition>
<extension>
 <docClass>REPORT</docClass>
 <accessId>GAOREPORTS-RCED-00-106</accessId>
 <reportNumber>RCED-00-106</reportNumber>
 <subject>Hazardous substances</subject>
 <subject>Nuclear facilities</subject>
 <subject>Environmental monitoring</subject>
 <subject>Schedule slippages</subject>
 <subject>Nuclear waste disposal</subject>
 <subject>Fixed price contracts</subject>
 <subject>Cost effectiveness analysis</subject>
 <subject>Cost control</subject>
 <subject>Privatization</subject>
 <subject>Atomic energy defense activities</subject>
 <identifier>DOE Advanced Mixed Waste Treatment Project</identifier>
 <identifier>DOE Environmental Management Program</identifier>
 <identifier>Idaho</identifier>
 <type>Letter Report</type>
 <seriesAbbrev>RCED</seriesAbbrev>
</extension>
<titleInfo>
 <title>Nuclear Waste: DOE&apos;s Advanced Mixed Waste Treatment</title>
</titleInfo>
<abstract>Pursuant to a congressional request, GAO assessed the Department of
Energy&apos;s (DOE) Advanced Mixed Waste Treatment Project&apos;s status and
potential uncertainties with regard to: (1) successfully treating mixed
waste; (2) meeting the project&apos;s deadlines; and (3) minimizing increases
in the contract price.&lt;p/&gt;GAO noted that: (1) changes in the technical approach have simplified
the treatment of most of the waste, but successful treatment of almost
one-fourth of the waste is less certain; (2) for the bulk of the waste,
these changes have brought less complexity to the treatment process; (3)
instead of incinerating about 75 percent of the waste and then putting
it into a glass-like or cement-like form, DOE&apos;s contractor, British
Nuclear Fuels Limited, Inc. (BNFL), determined that most of the waste
could simply be mechanically compressed and then packaged; (4) for the
remaining waste that was to be incinerated, however, recent events have
forced BNFL to reexamine its approach; (5) in March 2000, in order to
resolve a lawsuit over incinerating the waste and allow facility
construction to move forward, DOE agreed to appoint a special panel of
experts to identify possible alternatives to incineration; (6)
alternatives could include trying to obtain a waiver from current
regulations for transporting and disposing of organic substances or
identifying another technology to treat the waste; (7) BNFL&apos;s plan for
starting construction, originally set for May 1999, is now set for May
2000 at the earliest and will be postponed even longer; (8) this delay
is also likely to delay the start of the facility&apos;s operations, one of
the interim milestones in DOE&apos;s agreement with the state of Idaho,
scheduled for March 2003; (9) the main cause for the delay was BNFL&apos;s
overly optimistic assumption of the time needed for the state and the
Environmental Protection Agency to review and approve the construction
permits for the project; (10) changes in the requirements for permit
applications and the search for alternatives to incineration also
affected the permits; (11) as of April 2000, the permits still have not
been issued; (12) despite some opportunities to reduce the $876 million
contract price, including an $18 million reduction that occurred in
January 2000, other uncertainties make it likely that the contract price
will increase in the future; (13) the $18 million price reduction
occurred after BNFL simplified the technology for treating most of the
waste and, therefore, did not have to stabilize it before shipping it
out of state; and (14) regarding potential price increases, two main
uncertainties exist: (a) BNFL may be able to obtain additional payments
for the costs associated with the delays in starting construction of the
treatment facility; and (b) the costs associated with searching for an
alternative to incinerating about one-fourth of the waste may also
affect the contract price.</abstract>
<location>
 <url displayLabel="HTML rendition" access="raw object">https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/GAOREPORTS-RCED-00-106/html/GAOREPORTS-RCED-00-106.htm</url>
 <url displayLabel="PDF rendition" access="raw object">https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/GAOREPORTS-RCED-00-106/pdf/GAOREPORTS-RCED-00-106.pdf</url>
</location>
<identifier type="preferred citation">GAO/RCED-00-106</identifier>
<location>
 <url displayLabel="Content Detail" access="object in context">https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/GAOREPORTS-RCED-00-106</url>
</location>
<note>Letter Report</note>
<extension>
 <searchTitle>GAO/RCED-00-106; Nuclear Waste: DOE&apos;s Advanced Mixed Waste Treatment;
            </searchTitle>
</extension>
<subject>
 <topic>Hazardous substances</topic>
 <topic>Nuclear facilities</topic>
 <topic>Environmental monitoring</topic>
 <topic>Schedule slippages</topic>
 <topic>Nuclear waste disposal</topic>
 <topic>Fixed price contracts</topic>
 <topic>Cost effectiveness analysis</topic>
 <topic>Cost control</topic>
 <topic>Privatization</topic>
 <topic>Atomic energy defense activities</topic>
 <topic>DOE Advanced Mixed Waste Treatment Project</topic>
 <topic>DOE Environmental Management Program</topic>
 <topic>Idaho</topic>
</subject>
</mods>