<mods xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3" version="3.3" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3 http://www.loc.gov/standards/mods/v3/mods-3-3.xsd" ID="P0b002ee1803822eb">
<name type="corporate">
 <namePart>United States Government Publishing Office</namePart>
 <role>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">publisher</roleTerm>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="code">pbl</roleTerm>
</role>
 <role>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">distributor</roleTerm>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="code">dst</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="corporate">
 <namePart>United States</namePart>
 <namePart>Government Accountability Office</namePart>
 <namePart>Office of the Comptroller General</namePart>
 <role>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">author</roleTerm>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="code">aut</roleTerm>
</role>
 <description>Government Organization</description>
</name>
<typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource>
<genre authority="marcgt">government publication</genre>
<language>
 <languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm>
</language>
<extension>
 <collectionCode>GAOREPORTS</collectionCode>
 <category>Legislative Agency Publications</category>
 <waisDatabaseName>gao</waisDatabaseName>
 <branch>legislative</branch>
 <dateIngested>2010-08-12</dateIngested>
</extension>
<originInfo>
 <publisher>U.S. Government Printing Office</publisher>
 <dateIssued encoding="w3cdtf">1999-01-01</dateIssued>
 <issuance>monographic</issuance>
</originInfo>
<physicalDescription>
 <note type="source content type">deposited</note>
 <digitalOrigin>born digital</digitalOrigin>
 <extent>40 p.</extent>
</physicalDescription>
<classification authority="sudocs">GA 1.13:OCG-99-6</classification>
<identifier type="uri">https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/GAOREPORTS-OCG-99-6</identifier>
<identifier type="local">P0b002ee1803822eb</identifier>
<identifier type="former package identifier">f:cg99006</identifier>
<recordInfo>
 <recordContentSource authority="marcorg">DGPO</recordContentSource>
 <recordCreationDate encoding="w3cdtf">2010-08-12</recordCreationDate>
 <recordChangeDate encoding="w3cdtf">2011-03-28</recordChangeDate>
 <recordIdentifier source="DGPO">GAOREPORTS-OCG-99-6</recordIdentifier>
 <recordOrigin>machine generated</recordOrigin>
 <languageOfCataloging>
  <languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm>
</languageOfCataloging>
</recordInfo>
<accessCondition type="GPO scope determination">fdlp</accessCondition>
<extension>
 <docClass>REPORT</docClass>
 <accessId>GAOREPORTS-OCG-99-6</accessId>
 <reportNumber>OCG-99-6</reportNumber>
 <subject>Performance measures</subject>
 <subject>Accountability</subject>
 <subject>Risk management</subject>
 <subject>Internal controls</subject>
 <subject>Federal procurement</subject>
 <subject>Personnel recruiting</subject>
 <subject>Financial management</subject>
 <subject>Federal agency reorganization</subject>
 <subject>Contract administration</subject>
 <subject>Strategic planning</subject>
 <identifier>Performance and Accountability Series 1999</identifier>
 <identifier>Hanford (WA)</identifier>
 <identifier>National Performance Review</identifier>
 <identifier>Clinch River Breeder Reactor (TN)</identifier>
 <identifier>DOE Fermilab Main Injector Project (IL)</identifier>
 <identifier>DOE Superconducting Super Collider Project</identifier>
 <identifier>Rocky Flats Plant (CO)</identifier>
 <identifier>DOE Idaho Pit 9 Remediation Demonstration Project</identifier>
 <type>Letter Report</type>
 <seriesAbbrev>OCG</seriesAbbrev>
</extension>
<titleInfo>
 <title>Major Management Challenges and Program Risks: Department of Energy</title>
</titleInfo>
<abstract>As part of its Performance and Accountability Series, GAO provided
information on major management challenges and program risks facing the
Department of Energy (DOE).&lt;p/&gt;GAO noted that: (1) DOE has had difficulty completing large projects on
time and within budget; (2) from 1980 through 1996, DOE terminated 31 of
80 major system acquisitions (mission-critical projects costing over
$100 million) before completion, after expenditures of over $10 billion,
and completed only 15, most of which were behind schedule and over
budget; (3) with few exceptions, DOE&apos;s facilities are not licensed or
inspected by independent regulators to help ensure safe operations; (4)
the Department&apos;s own advisory committee concluded that widespread
environmental contamination at DOE facilities and the immense costs
associated with their cleanup provide clear evidence that
self-regulation has failed; (5) while DOE agreed to external regulation
in these areas, its commitment appears to be lagging; (6) DOE&apos;s
ineffective organizational structure blurs accountability, allowing
problems to go undetected and remain uncorrected; (7) DOE relies on
contractors to perform about 90 percent of its work; (8) recently, it
has significantly increased its use of competition in selecting
contractors to manage and operate its major facilities, but it should do
more; (9) however, it is still not competitively awarding contracts for
environmental restoration work at its national laboratories, even though
it does so at other facilities; (10) in addition, although DOE
originally planned to shift risk from the federal government to private
contractors as a means of enhancing their performance, it now considers
risk-sharing more appropriate; (11) DOE&apos;s staff lack technical and
management skills needed to oversee complex operations; (12) finding
enough staff with the necessary skills presents a serious challenge to
DOE, particularly in light of recent downsizing initiatives; (13) to
correct performance and management challenges, DOE developed a strategic
plan for contract reform in 1994; (14) in addition, during the early
1990s, DOE conducted or commissioned several studies of the missions and
organization of its national laboratories; (15) DOE completed strategic
and annual performance plans under the Results Act; and (16) these plans
responded to reported criticisms of DOE&apos;s operations and established
goals and measures for improved performance.</abstract>
<location>
 <url displayLabel="HTML rendition" access="raw object">https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/GAOREPORTS-OCG-99-6/html/GAOREPORTS-OCG-99-6.htm</url>
 <url displayLabel="PDF rendition" access="raw object">https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/GAOREPORTS-OCG-99-6/pdf/GAOREPORTS-OCG-99-6.pdf</url>
</location>
<identifier type="preferred citation">GAO/OCG-99-6</identifier>
<location>
 <url displayLabel="Content Detail" access="object in context">https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/GAOREPORTS-OCG-99-6</url>
</location>
<note>Letter Report</note>
<extension>
 <searchTitle>GAO/OCG-99-6; Major Management Challenges and Program Risks: Department of Energy;
            </searchTitle>
</extension>
<subject>
 <topic>Performance measures</topic>
 <topic>Accountability</topic>
 <topic>Risk management</topic>
 <topic>Internal controls</topic>
 <topic>Federal procurement</topic>
 <topic>Personnel recruiting</topic>
 <topic>Financial management</topic>
 <topic>Federal agency reorganization</topic>
 <topic>Contract administration</topic>
 <topic>Strategic planning</topic>
 <topic>Performance and Accountability Series 1999</topic>
 <topic>Hanford (WA)</topic>
 <topic>National Performance Review</topic>
 <topic>Clinch River Breeder Reactor (TN)</topic>
 <topic>DOE Fermilab Main Injector Project (IL)</topic>
 <topic>DOE Superconducting Super Collider Project</topic>
 <topic>Rocky Flats Plant (CO)</topic>
 <topic>DOE Idaho Pit 9 Remediation Demonstration Project</topic>
</subject>
</mods>