<mods xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3" version="3.3" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3 http://www.loc.gov/standards/mods/v3/mods-3-3.xsd" ID="P0b002ee180374bdc">
<name type="corporate">
 <namePart>United States Government Publishing Office</namePart>
 <role>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">publisher</roleTerm>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="code">pbl</roleTerm>
</role>
 <role>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">distributor</roleTerm>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="code">dst</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="corporate">
 <namePart>United States</namePart>
 <namePart>Government Accountability Office</namePart>
 <namePart>National Security and International Affairs Division</namePart>
 <role>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">author</roleTerm>
  <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="code">aut</roleTerm>
</role>
 <description>Government Organization</description>
</name>
<typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource>
<genre authority="marcgt">government publication</genre>
<language>
 <languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm>
</language>
<extension>
 <collectionCode>GAOREPORTS</collectionCode>
 <category>Legislative Agency Publications</category>
 <waisDatabaseName>gao</waisDatabaseName>
 <branch>legislative</branch>
 <dateIngested>2010-08-12</dateIngested>
</extension>
<originInfo>
 <publisher>U.S. Government Printing Office</publisher>
 <dateIssued encoding="w3cdtf">1998-11-17</dateIssued>
 <issuance>monographic</issuance>
</originInfo>
<physicalDescription>
 <note type="source content type">deposited</note>
 <digitalOrigin>born digital</digitalOrigin>
 <extent>53 p.</extent>
</physicalDescription>
<classification authority="sudocs">GA 1.13:NSIAD-99-9</classification>
<identifier type="uri">https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/GAOREPORTS-NSIAD-99-9</identifier>
<identifier type="local">P0b002ee180374bdc</identifier>
<identifier type="former package identifier">f:ns99009</identifier>
<recordInfo>
 <recordContentSource authority="marcorg">DGPO</recordContentSource>
 <recordCreationDate encoding="w3cdtf">2010-08-12</recordCreationDate>
 <recordChangeDate encoding="w3cdtf">2011-03-24</recordChangeDate>
 <recordIdentifier source="DGPO">GAOREPORTS-NSIAD-99-9</recordIdentifier>
 <recordOrigin>machine generated</recordOrigin>
 <languageOfCataloging>
  <languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm>
</languageOfCataloging>
</recordInfo>
<accessCondition type="GPO scope determination">fdlp</accessCondition>
<extension>
 <docClass>REPORT</docClass>
 <accessId>GAOREPORTS-NSIAD-99-9</accessId>
 <reportNumber>NSIAD-99-9</reportNumber>
 <subject>Military training</subject>
 <subject>Women</subject>
 <subject>Military personnel</subject>
 <subject>Medical examinations</subject>
 <subject>Performance measures</subject>
 <subject>Standards evaluation</subject>
 <subject>Standards and standardization</subject>
 <subject>Military policies</subject>
 <type>Chapter Report</type>
 <seriesAbbrev>NSIAD</seriesAbbrev>
</extension>
<titleInfo>
 <title>Gender Issues: Improved Guidance and Oversight Are Needed To Ensure Validity and Equity of Fitness Standards</title>
</titleInfo>
<abstract>Pursuant to a congressional request, GAO reviewed the military services&apos;
physical fitness and body fat standards to determine if: (1) differences
exist among the military services in physical fitness standards and
tests and the basis for any difference; (2) the services have a sound
basis for adjusting the standards for gender and age; and (3) the
Department of Defense (DOD) exercises adequate oversight of the fitness
program.&lt;p/&gt;GAO noted that: (1) significant differences exist in the tests and
standards that the military services use to measure physical fitness;
(2) these differences reflect varying levels of difficulty in required
performance in all testing areas--cardiovascular endurance, muscular
strength and endurance, and percentage of allowable body fat--and
occurred for different reasons; (3) specifically, services did not
always adhere to DOD guidance for fitness testing or, in some cases,
interpreted the guidance differently; (4) service officials stated that
confusion over the program&apos;s objectives, stemming from conflicting
statements in DOD&apos;s guidance, contributed to differences among the
services; (5) adjustments to account for physiological differences by
age and gender are, according to experts, appropriate for general
fitness and health standards, and DOD guidance requires that
gender-based adjustments be made; (6) although each of the services
adjusts for gender, the degree of adjustment varies considerably; (7)
inconsistent and sometimes arbitrary approaches to adjusting the
standards have contributed to questions concerning the fairness of the
standards applied to military men and women; (8) body fat standards are
also questionable due to: (a) differences in each service&apos;s equations
for estimating body fat, resulting in estimates ranging between 27 and
42 percent for the same woman; (b) outdated measurement approaches that
did not account for racial differences in bone density; and (c) changes
in ethnicity and other population characteristics of the current
military that question whether the populations used to develop the
equations represent the populations in today&apos;s military; (9) despite a
clear requirement for all services to test all personnel regardless of
age, the Navy and, until recently the Marine Corps, have exempted older
personnel from fitness testing for years because of concerns about being
able to retain senior leaders; (10) DOD&apos;s guidance and oversight of the
service physical fitness programs are not adequate; (11) multiple
program objectives and lack of DOD monitoring of service compliance with
key policies, have persisted since at least the early 1980s without
resolution; (12) DOD has not enforced annual reporting requirements or
identified a common set of statistics to use in monitoring the services&apos;
fitness programs; (13) the statistics currently maintained by the
services lack standardization; and (14) the limited data available raise
questions about program effectiveness because failure rates appear to be
markedly different among the services and women appear to fail at
significantly higher rates than men.</abstract>
<location>
 <url displayLabel="HTML rendition" access="raw object">https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/GAOREPORTS-NSIAD-99-9/html/GAOREPORTS-NSIAD-99-9.htm</url>
 <url displayLabel="PDF rendition" access="raw object">https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/GAOREPORTS-NSIAD-99-9/pdf/GAOREPORTS-NSIAD-99-9.pdf</url>
</location>
<identifier type="preferred citation">GAO/NSIAD-99-9</identifier>
<location>
 <url displayLabel="Content Detail" access="object in context">https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/GAOREPORTS-NSIAD-99-9</url>
</location>
<note>Chapter Report</note>
<extension>
 <searchTitle>GAO/NSIAD-99-9; Gender Issues: Improved Guidance and Oversight Are Needed To Ensure Validity and Equity of Fitness Standards;
            </searchTitle>
</extension>
<subject>
 <topic>Military training</topic>
 <topic>Women</topic>
 <topic>Military personnel</topic>
 <topic>Medical examinations</topic>
 <topic>Performance measures</topic>
 <topic>Standards evaluation</topic>
 <topic>Standards and standardization</topic>
 <topic>Military policies</topic>
</subject>
</mods>