United States Government Publishing Office publisher pbl distributor dst United States Government Accountability Office National Security and International Affairs Division author aut Government Organization text government publication eng GAOREPORTS Legislative Agency Publications gao legislative 2010-08-12 U.S. Government Printing Office 1999-02-22 monographic deposited born digital 40 p. GA 1.13:NSIAD-99-46 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/GAOREPORTS-NSIAD-99-46 P0b002ee1803a583f f:ns99046 DGPO 2010-08-12 2011-03-24 GAOREPORTS-NSIAD-99-46 machine generated eng fdlp REPORT GAOREPORTS-NSIAD-99-46 NSIAD-99-46 Privatization Military downsizing Military budgets Program evaluation Future budget projections Military cost control OMB Circular A-76 Program Letter Report NSIAD Pursuant to a congressional request, GAO reviewed the Department of Defense's (DOD) use Office of Management and Budget Circular A-76 as a means of realizing an estimated $6 billion savings in support costs between fiscal years (FY) 1997 and 2003, focusing on: (1) identifying the competition and savings goals; (2) assessing the accuracy of the savings estimates provided to Congress; and (3) evaluating the adequacy of planning to support the overall program.<p/>GAO noted that: (1) DOD has underway an unprecedented program to use competitions to gain economies and efficiencies in its operations and to reduce support costs; (2) while the numbers have evolved over time, as of now, DOD is planning to open over 229,000 government positions to competition within the public and private sectors over the next several years; (3) it estimates $6 billion cumulative savings between FY 1997 and FY 2003, and $2.3 billion in recurring savings each year thereafter, as a result of these efforts; (4) however, estimates of competitive savings provided to Congress in FY 1998 are overstated, and several issues are likely to reduce the estimated savings, at least in the short-term; (5) DOD has not fully calculated either the investment costs associated with undertaking these competitions or the personnel separation costs likely to be associated with implementing them; (6) further, there are numerous indications that DOD components have already begun to experience difficulties in launching and completing the competitions within the timeframes they initially projected; (7) as a result, the achievement of savings may be delayed; (8) various officials have expressed concern about the effects of not achieving the expected savings because reductions in future operating budgets have already been planned in anticipation of these savings; (9) comprehensive planning to identify specific functions and locations for competition among the services has been limited; (10) within individual military services, it has largely been up to individual installations or major commands to identify and prioritize specific activities and functions for study and to conduct competitions; and (11) the one service that has carried out a comprehensive assessment, the Air Force, has identified a potential shortfall in viable candidates for competition. https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/GAOREPORTS-NSIAD-99-46/html/GAOREPORTS-NSIAD-99-46.htm https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/GAOREPORTS-NSIAD-99-46/pdf/GAOREPORTS-NSIAD-99-46.pdf GAO/NSIAD-99-46 https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/GAOREPORTS-NSIAD-99-46 Letter Report GAO/NSIAD-99-46; DOD Competitive Sourcing: Questions About Goals, Pace, and Risks of Key Reform Initiative; Privatization Military downsizing Military budgets Program evaluation Future budget projections Military cost control OMB Circular A-76 Program Public Law 101-511 Public Law 105-270